Dataset Information

Pathological complete response of adding targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The current use of targeted therapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is based on data extrapolated from studies in non-IBC. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy results in a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with IBC.

Method and findings

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO register with registration number CRD42018089465. We searched MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO from December 1998 through July 2020. All English-language clinical studies, both randomized and non-randomized, that evaluated neoadjuvant systemic treatment with or without targeted therapy before definitive surgery and reported the pCR results of IBC patients. First reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Second reviewer confirmed the accuracy. Studies were divided into 3 groups according to systemic treatment: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy alone, and high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support (HSCS). Of 995 screened studies, 23 with 1,269 IBC patients met the inclusion criteria. For each of the 3 groups of studies, we computed a weighted average of the pCR rates across all studies with confidence interval (CI). The weighted averages (95% CIs) were as follows: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, 31.6% (26.4%-37.3%), chemotherapy alone, 13.0% (10.3%-16.2%), and high-dose chemotherapy with HSCS, 23.0% (18.7%-27.7%). The high pCR by targeted therapy group came from anti-HER2 therapy, 54.4% (44.3%-64.0%). Key limitations of this study included no randomized clinical studies that included only IBC patients.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is more effective than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for IBC patients. These findings support current IBC standard practice in particular the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

SUBMITTER: Chainitikun S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8051801 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer with pathological non-complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has a worse prognosis. Despite Neo-Bioscore has been validated as an independent prognostic model for breast cancer submitted to NAC, non-pCR carcinoma was not assessed in this setting.MethodsThis is a retrospective trial that included women with localized breast cancer who underwent NAC and had non-pCR carcinoma in surgical specimen between 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2015 with a three-year follow-up. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier estimator and hazard ratio (HR) set by log-rank test for the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). According to Neo-Bioscore, the proposed prognostic model named Clustered Neo-Bioscore was classified into low (0-3), low-intermediate (4-5), high-intermediate (6) and high (7) risk. The prognostic accuracy for recurrence risk was assessed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) methodology. Multivariate Cox regression assessed the menopausal status, histological grade, Ki-67, estrogen receptor, HER2, tumor subtype, pathological and clinical stages. Confidence interval at 95% (CI95%) and statistical significance at set 2-sided p-value less than 0.05 were adopted.ResultsAmong the 310 women enrolled, 267 patients (86.2%) had non-pCR carcinoma presenting size T3/T4 (63.3%), node-positive axilla (74.9%), stage III (62.9%), Ki-67???20% (71.9%) and non-luminal A (78.3%). Non-pCR carcinoma presented worse DFS-3y (HR?=?3.88, CI95%?=?1.18-11.95) but not OS-3y (HR?=?2.73, CI95%?=?0.66-11.40). Clustered Neo-Bioscore discerned the recurrence risk for non-pCR carcinoma: low (DFS-3y?=?0.86; baseline), low-intermediate (DFS-3y?=?0.70; HR?=?2.61), high-intermediate (DFS-3y?=?0.13, HR?=?14.05), and high (DFS-3y?=?not achieved; HR?=?22.19). The prognostic accuracy was similar between Clustered Neo-Bioscore and Neo-Bioscore (0.76 vs 0.78, p?>?0.05). Triple-negative subtype (HR?=?3.6, CI95%?=?1.19-10.92) and pathological stages II (HR?=?5.35, CI95%?=?1.19-24.01) and III (HR?=?6.56, CI95%?=?1.29-33.32) were prognoses for low-intermediate risk, whereas pathological stage III (HR?=?13.0, CI95%?=?1.60-106.10) was prognosis for low risk.ConclusionsClustered Neo-Bioscore represents a novel prognostic model of non-pCR carcinoma undergoing NAC with a more simplified and appropriate score pattern in the assessment of prognostic factors.

Project description:PurposeWe aimed to determine the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), clinicopathological factors associated with pCR, and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.MethodsMedical records of patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer between January 2007 and September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and the pCR rates were calculated according to three sets of criteria: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), and the German Breast Group (GBG). Tumors were classified as luminal A like, luminal B like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), or triple-negative. pCR and clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed at the median follow-up of 54.2 months.ResultsOf a total of 179 patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 167 patients (93.3%) had locally advanced breast cancer and 12 patients (6.7%) had early-stage breast cancer. The majority of patients (152 patients, 89.4%) received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective clinical response rate was 61.5%, comprising clinical partial response in 5.5% and clinical complete response in 3.9% of patients. Twenty-one (11.7%), 20 (11.2%), and 17 patients (9.5%) achieved pCR according to NSABP, MDACC, and GBG definitions, respectively. pCR rates, as defined by NSABP, according to breast cancer subtype were 4.4%, 9.7%, 24.2%, and 19.2% in luminal A like, luminal B like, HER2, and triple-negative subtypes, respectively. Patients who achieved pCR had significantly better DFS (5-year DFS rates, 80% vs. 53%, p=0.030) and OS (5-year OS rates, 86% vs. 54%, p=0.042) than those who did not.ConclusionThe pCR rate following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Thai women attending our institution was 11.7%; pCR was more frequently observed in HER2 and triple-negative breast tumor subtypes. Patients who achieved pCR had significantly improved survival.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The main purpose was to investigate the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based response patterns halfway through neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy (NAC) and pathological tumor response in patients with breast cancer. Secondary purposes were to compare the predictive value of MRI-based response patterns measured halfway through NAC and after NAC and to measure interobserver variability. METHODS:All consecutive patients treated with NAC for primary invasive breast cancer from 2012 to 2015 and who underwent breast MRI before, halfway through (and after) NAC were included. All breast tumors were reassessed on MRI by two experienced breast radiologists and classified into six patterns: type 0 (complete radiologic response); type 1 (concentric shrinkage); type 2 (crumbling); type 3 (diffuse enhancement); type 4 (stable disease); type 5 (progressive disease). Percentages of tumors showing pathological complete response (pCR), > 50% tumor reduction and > 50% tumor diameter reduction per MRI-based response pattern were calculated. Correlation between MRI-based response patterns and pathological tumor reduction was studied with Pearson's correlation coefficient, and interobserver agreement was tested with Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS:Patients (n = 76; mean age 53, range 29-72 years) with 80 tumors (4 bilateral) were included. There was significant correlation between these MRI-based response patterns halfway through NAC and tumor reduction on pathology assessment (reader 1 r = 0.33; p = 0.003 and reader 2 r = 0.45; p < 0.001). Type-0, type-1 or type-2 patterns halfway through NAC showed highest tumor reduction rates on pathology assessment, with > 50% tumor reduction in 90%, 78% and 65% of cases, respectively. In 83% of tumors with type 0 halfway through NAC, pathology assessment showed pCR. There was no significant correlation between MRI-based response patterns after NAC and tumor reduction rates on pathology assessment (reader 1 r = - 0.17; p = 0.145 and reader 2 r = - 0.17; p = 0.146). In 41% of tumors with type 0 after NAC, pathology assessment showed pCR. CONCLUSION:MRI-based response patterns halfway through NAC can predict pathologic response more accurately than MRI-based response patterns after NAC. Complete radiological response halfway NAC is associated with 83% pCR, while complete radiological response after NAC seems to be correct in only 41% of cases.