Switch from intravenous to subcutaneous immunoglobulin IgPro20 in CIDP patients: a prospective observational study under real-world conditions.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
IgPro20 is the first approved subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) preparation for the treatment of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Two different doses of the SCIg preparation were investigated in the pivotal PATH study. Real-world data, and particularly the efficacy of an equivalent dose switch from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) to SCIg, are still not available.Methods
In this prospective observational study, 41 patients with CIDP treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) were changed to an equivalent (1:1) dose of IgPro20 1 week after last IVIg treatment. Patients were examined at the time of switch from IVIg to SCIg, after 3 and after 6 months and efficacy, treatment preferences and systemic and local reactions were assessed.Results
Various clinical outcome parameters demonstrated overall stability regarding disability, general activity and social participation, grip and muscle strength, as well as gait impairment. Treatment satisfaction remained unchanged between IVIg and SCIg therapy. However, 88% of patients favoured treatment with subcutaneous IgPro20 over IVIg 6 months after switch to IgPro20.Conclusion
Results demonstrate that the switch of IVIg to an equivalent dose of SCIg represents an effective and preferred treatment option for CIDP patients.
SUBMITTER: Gingele S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8053839 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of weekly subcutaneous IgPro20 (Hizentra, CSL Behring) in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP).MethodsIn a 48-week open-label prospective extension study to the PATH study, patients were initially started on 0.2 g/kg or on 0.4 g/kg weekly and-if clinically stable-switched to 0.2 g/kg weekly after 24 weeks. Upon CIDP relapse on the 0.2 g/kg dose, 0.4 g/kg was (re)initiated. CIDP relapse was defined as a deterioration by at least 1 point in the total adjusted Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment score.ResultsEighty-two patients were enrolled. Sixty-two patients initially received 0.4 g/kg, 20 patients 0.2 g/kg weekly. Seventy-two received both doses during the study. Sixty-six patients (81%) completed the 48-week study duration. Overall relapse rates were 10% in 0.4 g/kg-treated patients and 48% in 0.2 g/kg-treated patients. After dose reduction from 0.4 to 0.2 g/kg, 51% (27/53) of patients relapsed, of whom 92% (24 of 26) improved after reinitiation of the 0.4 g/kg dose. Two-thirds of patients (19/28) who completed the PATH study without relapse remained relapse-free on the 0.2 g/kg dose after dose reduction in the extension study. Sixty-two patients had adverse events (AEs) (76%), of which most were mild or moderate with no related serious AEs.ConclusionsSubcutaneous treatment with IgPro20 provided long-term benefit at both 0.4 and 0.2 g/kg weekly doses with lower relapse rates on the higher dose. Long-term dosing should be individualized to find the most appropriate dose in a given patient.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with CIDP, long-term treatment with SCIG beyond 24 weeks is safe and efficacious.
| S-EPMC6624149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe safety and efficacy of subcutaneous immune globulin 20% (human) solution (Ig20Gly) were demonstrated in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence of the tolerability of self-administered Ig20Gly in elderly patients is lacking. We describe real-world patterns of Ig20Gly usage for 12 months in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD) in the USA.MethodsThis retrospective chart review of longitudinal data from 2 centers included patients aged ≥ 2 years with PIDD. Ig20Gly administration parameters, tolerability, and usage patterns were assessed at initial and subsequent 6- and 12-month infusions.ResultsOf 47 enrolled patients, 30 (63.8%) received immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) within 12 months before starting Ig20Gly, and 17 (36.2%) started IGRT de novo. Patients were predominantly White (89.1%), female (85.1%), and elderly (aged > 65 years, 68.1%; median age = 71.0 years). Most adults received at-home treatment during the study, and most self-administered at 6 months (90.0%) and 12 months (88.2%). Across all time points, infusions were administered at a mean rate of 60-90 mL/h/infusion, using a mean of 2 sites per infusion, on a weekly or biweekly frequency. No emergency department visits occurred, and hospital visits were rare (n = 1). Forty-six adverse drug reactions occurred in 36.4% of adults, mostly localized site reactions; none of these or any adverse events led to treatment discontinuation.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate tolerability and successful self-administration of Ig20Gly in PIDD, including elderly patients and patients starting IGRT de novo.
| S-EPMC10275800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeIntravenous (IVIG) and subcutaneous (SCIG) immunoglobulin infusions are widely used for the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) worldwide. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase III study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of IgPro20 (Hizentra®; L-proline-stabilized 20 % human SCIG) in adult and pediatric Japanese patients with PID.MethodsPatients received three IVIG infusions at 3-4-week intervals followed by a dose-equivalent switch to weekly SCIG infusions. A 12-week wash-in/wash-out period was followed by a 12-week SCIG efficacy period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of total serum IgG trough levels during the IVIG and SCIG efficacy periods by calculating the geometric mean ratio (GMR).ResultsThe GMR of IgG trough levels on SCIG versus IVIG was 1.09 (2-sided 90% confidence interval: 1.06-1.13). No serious bacterial infections were reported. Eleven patients (52.4%) had infectious episodes with an overall rate of 2.98 infections/patient/year; 7 patients (33.3%) missed school/work/daycare due to infection (3.48 days/patient/year). Sixteen patients (76.2%) were treated with antibiotics for an adverse event (AE; 47.6%) or prophylaxis (23.8%), resulting in 167.42 days/patient/year of antibiotic use. During SCIG treatment, 24 patients (96.0%) had 269 AEs (0.461 AEs per/infusion) including local reactions as the most common AE (20 patients, 80.0%). Local tolerability of IgPro20 was assessed as "very good" or "good" after 85.4% of SCIG infusions. One patient (4.0%) experienced a serious AE of moderate severity (bacterial infection) that was considered unrelated to study medication.ConclusionIgPro20 was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with PID.
| S-EPMC3937544 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSubcutaneous immunoglobulin is one of the standard treatments for hypogammaglobulinemia in primary immunodeficiencies (PID) worldwide. In Japan, IgPro20 (Hizentra® ; l-proline-stabilized 20% human subcutaneous immunoglobulin) is approved for agammaglobulinemia or hypogammaglobulinemia due to PID or secondary immunodeficiency (SID); however, its safety and effectiveness has not previously been assessed in a real-world setting.MethodsThis multicenter, open label post-marketing surveillance study was conducted between January 2014 and March 2019. Patients who received IgPro20 due to PID or SID were included after informed consent. Physicians completed a case report form for each patient. Safety was determined from reported adverse events (AEs), adverse drug reactions, and serious AEs (SAEs); effectiveness was assessed by infection rates after the first IgPro20 dose.ResultsOf 85 patients receiving IgPro20 in the safety analysis, 39 developed AEs (45.9%; PID n = 28, SID n = 11). At least one adverse drug reaction was observed in 27 patients (31.8%; PID n = 21, SID n = 6), and the most common were injection site reactions (n = 17, 20.0%). Four patients (PID n = 3, SID n = 1) reported SAEs but two were unrelated to IgPro20 administration. The infection rate decreased from 0.54 per patient during the 6 months before IgPro20 to 0.39 per patient during IgPro20 treatment. Serious bacterial infections occurred in six patients before IgPro20 (7.9%; PID n = 2; SID n = 4) but in only one patient with SID during IgPro20 treatment (1.2%).ConclusionsIn Japan, IgPro20 was considered safe and effective among patients with agammaglobulinemia or hypogammaglobulinemia due to PID or SID.
| S-EPMC10099597 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSubcutaneous (SC) vedolizumab is effective in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) when administered after induction with two infusions.AimTo assess the effectiveness, safety and pharmacokinetics of a switch from intravenous (IV) to SC maintenance vedolizumab in patients with IBD METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients with IBD who had ≥4 months IV vedolizumab were switched to SC vedolizumab. We studied the time to discontinuation of SC vedolizumab, adverse events (AEs), changes in clinical and biochemical outcomes and vedolizumab concentrations at baseline, and weeks 12 and 24.ResultsWe included 82 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 53 with ulcerative colitis (UC). Eleven (13.4%) patients with CD and five (9.4%) with UC discontinued SC vedolizumab after a median of 18 (IQR 8-22) and 6 weeks (IQR 5-10), respectively. Four patients with CD switched to a different drug due to loss of response, nine switched back to IV vedolizumab due to adverse events, and three due to needle fear. Common AEs were injection site reactions (n = 15) and headache (n = 6). Median clinical and biochemical disease activity remained stable after the switch. Median serum vedolizumab concentrations increased from 19 μg/ml at the time of the switch to 31 μg/ml 12 weeks after the switch (p < 0.005).ConclusionsSwitching from IV to SC vedolizumab maintenance treatment is effective in patients with CD or UC. However, 9% of patients were switched back to IV vedolizumab due to adverse events or fear of needles.
| S-EPMC9540102 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immunoglobulin replacement therapy with facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIg) can be self-administrated at home and given at longer intervals compared to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) therapy, but real-word experience of home-based fSCIg therapy is limited. Herein we present our real-word clinical experiences with home-based fSCIg therapy using a three-step ramp-up schedule. We registered data from all patients with immunodeficiency starting fSCIg from 01.01.2017 to 31.12.2019. For comparison we also included patients starting conventional SCIg training. Fifty-four patients followed for a median of 18 months (IQR 12, range 0-40), received fSCIg training, and 84 patients received conventional SCIg training. Out of 54 patients starting with fSCIg, 41 patients had previous experience with conventional SCIg therapy, and the main reason for starting fSCIg was 'longer intervals between therapies' (n=48). We found an increase in training requirement for fSCIg (3 ± 1 [2-9] days) compared to conventional SCIg (2 ± 0 [1-7] days), P< 0.001 (median ± IQR, [range]). For fSCIg training, IgG levels were stable from baseline (8.9 ± 2.3 g/L), 3-6 months (10.2 ± 2.2 g/L) and 9-12 months (9.9 ± 2.3 g/L), P= 0.11 (mean ± SD). The most common side-effect was: 'rubor around injection site' (n=48, 89%). No patients experienced severe adverse events (grade 3-4). Thirteen patients (24%) discontinued fSCIg therapy due to local adverse events (n=9), cognitive/psychological difficulties (n=6) and/or systemic adverse events (n=3). In conclusion, fSCIg training using a three-step ramp-up schedule is safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients, but requires longer training time compared to conventional SCIg.
| S-EPMC8127781 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSevere hemolysis rarely occurs in patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. A systematic review was performed to assess the incidence of IVIG-related hemolysis and the impact of patient and product risk factors.Study design and methodsA systematic literature search for terms related to "IVIG products", "hemolysis," and "adverse events" was conducted in Embase for articles published between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021. Studies with no clinical datasets, no IVIG treatment, or where IVIG was used to treat hemolytic conditions were excluded. Of the 430 articles retrieved, 383 were excluded based on titles/abstracts and 14 were excluded after in-depth review.ResultsIn total, 33 articles were analyzed and separated into observational studies (n = 16), clinical trials (n = 8), and case reports (n = 9). The incidence proportion for IVIG-related hemolysis ranged from 0% to 19% in observational studies and 0%-21% in clinical trials. A higher incidence of IVIG-related hemolysis was consistently reported in patients with blood groups A and AB. Hemolysis occurred more frequently in patients treated with IVIG for some conditions such as Kawasaki disease; however, this may be confounded by the high dose of IVIG therapy. IVIG-related hemolysis incidence was lower in studies using IVIG products citing manufacturing processes to reduce isoagglutinin levels than products that did not.ConclusionThis analysis identified patient and product risk factors including blood group, IVIG dose, and IVIG manufacturing processes associated with elevated IVIG-related hemolysis incidence.
| S-EPMC9545798 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundVedolizumab has since 2021 been available as a subcutaneous formulation. We aimed to assess 18-month drug persistence and possible predictive factors associated with discontinuation, safety, serum drug profile, drug dosing, and disease activity in a real-world cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease switched from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance treatment.MethodsEligible patients were switched to subcutaneous vedolizumab and followed for 18 months or until discontinuation of subcutaneous treatment. Data on preferred route of administration, adverse events, drug dosing, serum-vedolizumab, disease activity, fecal calprotectin, and C-reactive protein were collected. Persistence was described using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The impact of clinical and biochemical variables on persistence was analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsWe included 108 patients, and the estimated 18-month drug persistence was 73.6% (95% CI [64.2-80.1]). Patients in clinical remission at switch were less likely to discontinue SC treatment (HR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.73], P = .006), and patients favoring intravenous treatment at switch were almost 3 times more likely to discontinue (HR = 2.78, 95% CI [1.31-5.90], P = .008). Four patients discontinued subcutaneous vedolizumab due to injection site reactions. At 18 months, 88% of patients administered subcutaneous vedolizumab with an interval of ≥ 14 days, and serum-vedolizumab was 39.1 mg/L. Disease activity was stable during follow-up.ConclusionsThree of the four patients remained on subcutaneous vedolizumab after 18 months, a large proportion received treatment at standard dosing intervals, and disease activity remained stable. This indicates that switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment is convenient and safe.
| S-EPMC10972549 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundChronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare, progressive autoimmune disease causing peripheral nervous system dysfunction. Guidelines recommend immunoglobulin (IG) therapy as an immunomodulatory agent in CIDP. Drawbacks and unmet needs with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) include adverse effects and wear-off effects, along with the burden of administration based on site of care. Subcutaneous administration of Hizentra, a subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) reduces patient burden by allowing self-administration outside the hospital setting and has fewer adverse events (AEs).ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the expected cost of treatment and the budget impact of Hizentra compared with IVIG for maintenance treatment of CIDP in the United States.MethodsA decision tree model was developed to estimate the expected budget impact of maintenance treatment with Hizentra for US stakeholders. The model adopts primarily a US integrated delivery network perspective and, secondarily, a commercial perspective over a 1-year time horizon. Pharmacy costs were based on a payment mix of average sales price (73%), wholesale acquisition cost (2%), and average wholesale price (25%). Costs in the model reflect 2022 US dollars. In accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines and recommendations for budget impact modeling, no discounting was performed. The PATH clinical study of Hizentra maintenance in CIDP was used to determine clinical inputs for relapse rates at initial assessment (24 weeks) and at 52 weeks for Hizentra. The ICE clinical study of Gamunex maintenance in CIDP was the basis of relapse rates for Gamunex (and other IVIGs). Literature-based estimates were obtained for infusion costs by site of care, costs of IVIG infusion-related complications, and significant IVIG AE rates. Hizentra AE rates from the US Hizentra prescribing information were assessed but were not included in the model as the AEs in CIDP were mild, easily treated, and self-limited. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate variations from the base case.ResultsThe model showed that a Hizentra starting dose of 0.2 g/kg is expected to result in annual cost savings of US$32,447 per patient compared with IVIG. For a hypothetical 25-million-member plan, the budget impact of a 10% market share shift from IVIG to Hizentra is expected to result in savings of US$2,296,235.ConclusionThis analysis projects that Hizentra is likely associated with favorable economic benefit compared with IVIG in managing CIDP.
| S-EPMC9910243 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsEarly detection and treatment of neurodegenerative Langerhans cell histiocytosis (ND-LCH) have been suggested to prevent neurodegenerative progression. The aim of the study is to validate a standardized multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up to monitor the intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) treatment response and the natural course of the disease in untreated patients.MethodsPatients with abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) received monthly 0.5 g/kg IVIG. The diagnostic protocol included structural 3T MRI, neurological examination, brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) and SEPs.ResultsTwenty-two patients were followed for 5.2 years (median) from the first MRI evidence of ND-LCH. Eleven patients received IVIG for 1.7 years (median). At treatment start neurological examination was abnormal in 10 patients, of whom two had severe clinical impairment and four had abnormal BAEPs. At last follow-up, 1/11 remained stable and 7/11 improved, while worsening of neurological or neurophysiological findings, or both, occurred in 3/11. Risk factors for worsening were a severe clinical or MRI ND-LCH at treatment initiation and prolonged exposure to LCH. Of the 11 untreated patients, none improved and three worsened.ConclusionsUsing a standardized diagnostic protocol, we demonstrated that IVIG treatment can lead to clinical stabilization or improvement in all pauci-symptomatic patients with an MRI grading of less than 4.
| S-EPMC11361919 | biostudies-literature