Dataset Information

Omental metastasis as a predictive risk factor for unfavorable prognosis in patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer has a clear predilection for the omentum as the site of metastasis; however, its contribution to clinical outcomes remains unresolved. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance and efficacy of chemotherapy in the presence of omental metastasis.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 56 patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer who underwent primary debulking surgery between 2004 and 2018 at Kumamoto University Hospital.

Results

Thirty-six (64.3%) patients were categorized into the omental metastasis-positive group, whereas 20 (35.7%) patients were in the omental metastasis-negative group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 43.4% in the omental metastasis-positive group and 93.8% in the omental metastasis-negative group. Statistically significant differences were observed in overall survival (p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (p = 0.036) between the omental metastasis-positive and metastasis-negative groups. Notably, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the existence of omental metastasis is an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer (hazard ratio 8.90, 95% confidence interval 1.16-69.77; p = 0.038). Furthermore, the omental metastasis-positive group had significantly lower overall response rates to chemotherapy for recurrent disease, compared to the omental metastasis-negative group (31.6% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.026).

Conclusion

Our present data demonstrated that omental metastasis is closely associated with an unfavorable prognosis due to increased chemoresistance in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Elucidating the biological mechanism of omental metastasis will shed light on novel therapeutic approaches for the management of advanced ovarian cancer patients.

SUBMITTER: Iwagoi Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8055622 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChemotherapy resistance remains a major obstacle in the treatment of women with ovarian cancer. Establishing predictive markers of chemoresponse would help to individualize therapy and improve survival of ovarian cancer patients. Chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer has been studied thoroughly and several non-overlapping single genes, gene profiles and copy number alterations have been suggested as potential markers. The objective of this study was to explore genetic alterations behind chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer with the ultimate aim to find potential predictive markers.MethodsTo create the best opportunities for identifying genetic alterations of importance for resistance, we selected a homogenous tumor material concerning histology, stage and chemotherapy. Using high-resolution whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), we analyzed the tumor genomes of 40 fresh-frozen stage III ovarian serous carcinomas, all uniformly treated with combination therapy paclitaxel/carboplatin. Fisher's exact test was used to identify significant differences. Subsequently, we examined four genes in the significant regions (EVI1, MDS1, SH3GL2, SH3KBP1) plus the ABCB1 gene with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) to evaluate the impact of DNA alterations on the transcriptional level.ResultsWe identified gain in 3q26.2, and losses in 6q11.2-12, 9p22.3, 9p22.2-22.1, 9p22.1-21.3, Xp22.2-22.12, Xp22.11-11.3, and Xp11.23-11.1 to be significantly associated with chemotherapy resistance. In the gene expression analysis, EVI1 expression differed between samples with gain versus without gain, exhibiting higher expression in the gain group.ConclusionIn conclusion, we detected specific genetic alterations associated with resistance, of which some might be potential predictive markers of chemotherapy resistance in advanced ovarian serous carcinomas. Thus, further studies are required to validate these findings in an independent ovarian tumor series.

Project description:Objective: to analyze the evolution of surgical techniques and strategies, and to determine their influence on the survival of patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: a retrospective data analysis was performed in two French tertiary cancer institutes. The analysis included clinical information, cytoreductive outcome (complete, optimal and suboptimal), definitive pathology, Overall Survival (OS), and Progression-Free Survival (PFS). Three surgical strategies were compared: Primary Cytoreductive Surgery (PCS), Interval Cytoreductive Surgery (ICS) after three cycles of Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC), and Final Cytoreductive Surgery (FCS) after at least six cycles of NAC. We analyzed four distinct time intervals: prior to 2000, between 2000 and 2004, between 2005 and 2009, and after 2009. Results: data from 1474 patients managed for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III (80%) or IV (20%) EOC were analyzed. Throughout the four time intervals, the rate of patients who were treated only medically increased significantly (10.1% vs. 22.6% p < 0.001). NAC treatment increased from 20.1% to 52.2% (p < 0.001). Complete resection rate increased from 37% to 66.2% (p < 0.001). Of our study population, 1260 patients (85.5%) underwent surgery. OS was longer in cases of complete cytoreduction (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.123 CI 95% [1.816-2.481] p < 0.001) but the surgical strategy itself did not affect median OS. OS was 44.9 months, 50.3 months, and 42 months for PCS, ICS, and FCS, respectively (p = 0.410). After adjusting for surgical strategies (PCS, ICS, and FCS), all patients with complete cytoreduction presented similar OS with no significant difference. However, PFS was three months shorter when FCS was compared to PCS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In our 30 years' experience of EOC management, complete resection rate was the only independent factor that significantly improved OS and PFS, regardless of the surgical strategy.