Dataset Information

Development of Innovative Neurosurgical Operation Support Method Using Mixed-Reality Computer Graphics.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In neurosurgery, it is important to inspect the spatial correspondence between the preoperative medical image (virtual space), and the intraoperative findings (real space) to improve the safety of the surgery. Navigation systems and related modalities have been reported as methods for matching this correspondence. However, because of the influence of the brain shift accompanying craniotomy, registration accuracy is reduced. In the present study, to overcome these issues, we developed a spatially accurate registration method of medical fusion 3-dimensional computer graphics and the intraoperative brain surface photograph, and its registration accuracy was measured.

Methods

The subjects included 16 patients with glioma. Nonrigid registration using the landmarks and thin-plate spline methods was performed for the fusion 3-dimensional computer graphics and the intraoperative brain surface photograph, termed mixed-reality computer graphics. Regarding the registration accuracy measurement, the target registration error was measured by two neurosurgeons, with 10 points for each case at the midpoint of the landmarks.

Results

The number of target registration error measurement points was 160 in the 16 cases. The target registration error was 0.72 ± 0.04 mm. Aligning the intraoperative brain surface photograph and the fusion 3-dimensional computer graphics required ∼10 minutes on average. The average number of landmarks used for alignment was 24.6.

Conclusions

Mixed-reality computer graphics enabled highly precise spatial alignment between the real space and virtual space. Mixed-reality computer graphics have the potential to improve the safety of the surgery by allowing complementary observation of brain surface photographs and fusion 3-dimensional computer graphics.

SUBMITTER: Koike T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8059082 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOver the past 20 years Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has grown in clinical use to support walking in people with lower limb weakness or paralysis due to upper motor neuron lesions. Despite growing consensus regarding its benefits, provision across the UK and internationally is variable. This study aimed to explore stakeholder views relating to the value of a clinical guideline focusing on service provision of FES to support walking, how people might use it and what should be included.MethodsA mixed methods exploration sought the views of key stakeholders. A pragmatic online survey (n = 223) focusing on the study aim was developed and distributed to the email distribution list of the UK Association for Chartered Physiotherapists Interested in Neurology (ACPIN). In parallel, a qualitative service evaluation and patient public involvement consultation was conducted. Two group, and seven individual interviews were conducted with: FES-users (n = 6), their family and carers (n = 3), physiotherapists (n = 4), service providers/developers (n = 2), researchers (n = 1) and distributors of FES (n = 1). Descriptive analysis of quantitative data and framework analysis of qualitative data were conducted.ResultsSupport for clinical guideline development was clear in the qualitative interviews and the survey results. Survey respondents most strongly endorsed possible uses of the clinical guideline as ensuring best practice and supporting people seeking access to a FES service. Data analysis and synthesis provided clear areas for inclusion in the clinical guidelines, including current research evidence and consensus relating to who is most likely to benefit and optimal service provision as well as pathways to access this. Specific areas for further investigation were summarised for inclusion in the first stage of a Delphi consensus study.ConclusionsKey stakeholders believe in the value of a clinical guideline that focuses on the different stages of service provision for FES to support walking. A Delphi consensus study is being planned based on the findings.

Project description:BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, disabling, and prevalent disorder. As there is no cure for OA, long-term self-management is paramount. Support groups (SGs) can facilitate self-management among people living with OA. Understanding preferences in design and features of SGs, including online SGs (OSGs), among people with OA can inform future development of SG interventions for this condition.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate health care- and health information-seeking behavior, digital literacy, and preferences for the design of SGs in people with OA. The study also explored the perceived barriers and enablers to being involved in OSGs.MethodsAn online survey study was conducted with a mixed method design (quantitative and qualitative). Individuals aged ≥45 years with knee, hip, or back pain for ≥3 months were recruited from an extant patient database of the Institute of Bone and Joint Research via email invitations. Quantitative elements of the survey included questions about sociodemographic background; health care- and health information-seeking behavior; digital literacy; and previous participation in, and preferences for, SGs and OSGs. Respondents were classified into 2 groups (Yes-SG and No-SG) based on previous participation or interest in an SG. Group differences were assessed with Chi-square tests (significance level set at 5%). Responses to free-text questions relating to preferences regarding OSG engagement were analyzed qualitatively using an inductive thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 415 people with OA completed the survey (300/415, 72.3% females; 252/415, 61.0% lived in a major city). The Yes-SG group included 307 (307/415, 73.9%) participants. Between the Yes-SG and No-SG groups, there were no differences in sociodemographic characteristics, health care- and health information-seeking behavior, and digital literacy. An online format was preferred by 126/259 (48.7%) of the Yes-SG group. Trained peer facilitators were preferred, and trustworthiness of advice and information were highly prioritized by the respondents. Qualitative analysis for OSG participation revealed 5 main themes. Lack of time and motivation were the main barriers identified. The main enablers were related to accessibility, enjoyment of the experience, and the content of the discussed information.ConclusionsThese findings highlight the preferences in design features and content of SGs and OSGs and may assist in the further development of such groups.