Dataset Information

Happiness in marginalized populations: a community-based study in South Central Iran.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Happiness has multiple levels and determinants in different communities, cultures, and social groups. The current study aimed to investigate happiness and its main determinants in slums in south central Iran.

Methods

This community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of adults at least 18 years of age living in the biggest slum area in Shiraz, south central Iran. To determine levels of happiness, participants were asked to complete the Persian version of the GHQ28 questionnaire and a checklist based on the 2017 World Happiness Report. Data was analyzed using SPSS software version 19. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 42.06 ± 16.34 years. Overall, 542 participants (45 %) were females, 257 (21.3 %) were illiterate, 678 (56.3 %) were married, and 495 (41.1 %) were unemployed and lived with their household. The happiness score, according to the Cantril ladder score, was 6.41 ± 2 (out of a total score of 10). Happiness was not correlated with gender (p = 0.37) or immigration (p = 0.06). Lower levels of happiness were seen in older adults (r=- 0.12, p < 0.001), illiterates (p = 0.03), the unemployed (p < 0.001), and people separated from their spouses (p < 0.001). Job satisfaction (p < 0.001, r = 0.47), total general health (p < 0.001, r=-0.36) and hope (p < 0.001, r = 0.41) were significantly correlated with happiness. Social support (< 0.001) and sufficient income and satisfaction (p < 0.001) were related with a higher score of happiness.

Conclusions

Marital status, smoking, employment and job satisfaction, social support and trust, feelings of insecurity in the neighborhood, hope for the future, facing violence, and income satisfaction were the main determinants of happiness in the Sang Siah slum area.

SUBMITTER: Kazemi M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8063348 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceDisparities persist in testing and treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), leaving socially marginalized populations less likely to benefit from curative treatment. Linkage services are often insufficient to overcome barriers to navigating the medical system and contextual factors.ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of HCV treatment at the point of HCV infection diagnosis disclosure in a nonclinical community setting.Design, setting, and participantsIn this single-arm nonrandomized controlled trial conducted between July 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021, street-outreach recruitment targeted people experiencing homelessness and injecting drugs in an urban US community who were eligible for simplified HCV treatment.InterventionsStudy procedures were designed to reflect the community environment and services needed to provide HCV testing, disclosure, and treatment in a nonclinical site. The test-and-treat No One Waits (NOW) model of care provided a 2-week starter pack of 400 mg of sofosbuvir and 100 mg of velpatasvir at time of HCV RNA results disclosure. Participants were transitioned to insurance-provided sofosbuvir-velpatasvir when feasible to complete a 12-week treatment course.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was sustained virologic response at posttreatment week 12 or later (SVR12). Acceptability end points were treatment initiation and completion. Safety end points were treatment discontinuation because of a late exclusion criterion and adverse events.ResultsOf the 492 people (median [IQR] age, 48 [37-58] years; 62 [71%] male) who underwent anti-HCV testing, 246 (50%) tested anti-HCV positive, and 111 (23%) tested HCV RNA positive and were eligible for simplified HCV treatment. Eighty-nine of the 111 eligible participants (80%) returned for confirmatory RNA results, and 87 (98%) accepted and initiated HCV treatment. Seventy (80%) were currently injecting drugs, 83 (97%) had an income below the poverty line, and 53 (61%) were currently unsheltered. Most had HCV genotype 1a (45 [52%]) or 3 (20 [23%]). Sixty-nine (79%) completed 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment, 2 stopped treatment because of low adherence, and 16 were lost to follow-up. Of the 66 participants who completed treatment and had a successful blood draw, 61 (92%) had undetectable HCV RNA at treatment completion. Of the 87 treated patients, 58 achieved SVR12, leading to a treatment response of 67% (95% CI, 56%-76%) among the intention-to-treat group and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) among the per-protocol group. There were no adverse events, late exclusions, or deaths.Conclusions and relevanceIn this nonrandomized controlled trial of HCV treatment at the point of diagnosis, the NOW model of care reduced steps between HCV testing and treatment initiation and resulted in high levels of treatment initiation, completion, and cure. The NOW model of care can expand the current HCV test-and-treat toolkit by reaching a broader population of marginalized communities and expediting curative therapy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03987503.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:A decline in malaria morbidity and mortality has been documented in Ethiopia since 2005 following a scale-up of the distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs). However, universal access to LLINs ownership and use has not yet been achieved. This study aimed to determine ownership and use of LLINs over time in south-central Ethiopia. METHODS:A cohort of 17,142 individuals residing in 3,006 households was followed-up from October 2014 to January 2017 (121 weeks). New PermaNet2.0 LLINs were given to households in October 2014. Once per week, the LLIN use status was documented for each individual. A survey was conducted after 110 weeks of LLIN distribution to determine LLIN ownership. A multilevel negative binomial regression model was fitted to identify significant predictors of LLIN use. RESULTS:At baseline, the LLIN ownership was 100%. After 110 weeks only 233 (8%) of the households owned at least one LLIN. The median proportion of LLIN use per individuals during the study period was only 14%. During the first year (week 1-52) the average LLIN use per individuals was 36% and during the second year (week 53-104) it was 4.6%. More frequent LLIN use was reported among age group [5-14 years (adjusted IRR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.22), 15-24 years (adjusted IRR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.23-1.45), ?25 years (adjusted IRR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.83-2.17)] compared to <5 years, and household head educational status [read and write (adjusted IRR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26), primary (adjusted IRR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.27), secondary or above (adjusted IRR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.11-1.30)] compared to illiterate. Having a family size of over five persons (adjusted IRR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.84) was associated with less frequent use of LLINs compared to a family size of ?5 persons. CONCLUSIONS:The study showed a low LLIN ownership after 110 weeks and a low LLIN use during 121 weeks of follow-up, despite 100% LLIN coverage at baseline. The study highlights the need to design strategies to increase LLIN ownership and use for setting similar to those studied here.

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative evaluation of a behavioral intervention to prevent and treat childhood obesity in minority children. Using qualitative methods to augment understanding of intervention success may be one way to gain insight into the types of behavior change strategies that are most effective in childhood obesity interventions.MethodsCOACH was a randomized controlled trial of 117 Latino parent-child (ages 3-5) pairs in Nashville, TN that resulted in improved child BMI in intervention vs. control families at 1-year follow-up. All participant parents were invited to focus groups after the trial. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and translated into English. A hierarchical coding scheme was generated, and qualitative analysis done using an inductive/deductive approach. Both theme saturation and consensus between the coders were achieved. Responses were compared between intervention and control groups.ResultsWe conducted seven focus groups with 43 participants. 4 themes emerged from the intervention group: 1) perceived barriers to health behavior change; 2) strategies learned to overcome perceived barriers; 3) behavioral changes made in response to the program; and 4) knowledge, skills, and agency for family health behaviors. 4 themes emerged from the control group: 1) a desire to engage in health behaviors without specific strategies; 2) common set of barriers to health behavior change; 3) engagement in literacy activities, including creative problem-solving strategies; and 4) changes made in response to study visits. Analysis of coded data showed the intervention increased healthy behaviors (e.g., fruit/vegetable consumption) despite barriers (e.g., time, cost, culture, family dynamics). Intervention participants described using specific behavior change strategies promoted by the intervention including: substituting ingredients in culturally-normative recipes; avoiding grocery shopping when hungry; and coping with inability to meet goals with acceptance and problem-solving. Control participants reported little success in achieving healthy changes for their family. Intervention participants described successful health behavior changes that were shared across generations and were maintained after the program. Intervention participants reported increased awareness of their own agency in promoting their health.ConclusionsQualitative evaluation of COACH provides a more detailed understanding of the intervention's quantitative effectiveness: child and adult health behaviors and personal agency were improved.

Project description:BackgroundSoil-transmitted helminths (STH) remain a major public health problem, particularly in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. Though infections are prevalent among all age groups, the world health organization (WHO) considers Pre-school age children (PSAC), school-aged children, and pregnant women as segments of population at high risk of STH morbidities.ObjectiveThis study aimed at determining the prevalence and infection intensity of STH and associated factors among PSAC in Butajira Town, south-central Ethiopia.MethodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May to June, 2014 in Butajira Town. The PSAC were selected by systematic sampling technique and invited to participate in the present study. McMaster technique was employed for parasitological analysis of stool samples. Pearson's Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed where appropriate to identify any association between STH infection and independent factors. Multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to identify independent predictors of STH among the PSAC. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsA total of 377 (with 96% compliance rate) PSAC were able to provide complete data (socio-demographic information and stool sample). The study showed that 23.3% (88/377) PSAC were infected with one or more species of STH. Ascaris lumbricoides was the most prevalent STH (14.9%) followed by Trichuris trichiura (6.4%). The overall infection intensity, expressed as geometric mean for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworms were 229, 178, and 154 eggs per gram of stool, respectively. The multivariate logistic regression model estimated that being in the age group of 36-47 months (AOR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2-5.3, P = 0.016), untrimmed finger nail (AOR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8-5.5, P < 0.001), and not washing hands before a meal (AOR: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.4, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of STH infections among the children.ConclusionThe present study showed that STH was a public health problem among PSAC in the study area necessitating annual deworming to control morbidities associated with STH. Besides, the existing health education program should also be strengthened to prevent re-infection.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Understanding the spatiotemporal clustering of malaria transmission would help target interventions in settings of low malaria transmission. The aim of this study was to assess whether malaria infections were clustered in areas with long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) alone, indoor residual spraying (IRS) alone, or a combination of LLINs and IRS interventions, and to determine the risk factors for the observed malaria clustering in southern-central Ethiopia. METHODS:A cohort of 34,548 individuals residing in 6,071 households was followed for 121 weeks, from October 2014 to January 2017. Both active and passive case detection mechanisms were used to identify clinical malaria episodes, and there were no geographic heterogeneity in data collection methods. Using SaTScan software v 9.4.4, a discrete Poisson model was used to identify high rates of spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal malaria clustering. A multilevel logistic regression model was fitted to identify predictors of spatial malaria clustering. RESULTS:The overall incidence of malaria was 16.5 per 1,000 person-year observations. Spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal clustering of malaria was detected in all types of malaria infection (P. falciparum, P. vivax, or mixed). Spatial clustering was identified in all study arms: for LLIN + IRS arm, a most likely cluster size of 169 cases in 305 households [relative risk (RR) = 4.54, P<0.001]; for LLIN alone arm a cluster size of 88 cases in 103 households (RR = 5.58, P<0.001); for IRS alone arm a cluster size of 58 cases in 50 households (RR = 7.15, P<0.001), and for control arm a cluster size of 147 cases in 377 households (RR = 2.78, P<0.001). Living 1 km closer to potential vector breeding sites increased the odds of being in spatial clusters by 41.32 fold (adjusted OR = 41.32, 95% CI = 3.79-138.89). CONCLUSIONS:The risk of malaria infection varied significantly between kebeles, within kebeles, and even among households in areas targeted for different types of malaria control interventions in low malaria transmission setting. The results of this study can be used in planning and implementation of malaria control strategies at micro-geographic scale. TRIAL REGISTRATION:PACT R2014 11000 882128 (8 September 2014).

Project description:BackgroundEmpowered women have improved decision-making capacity and can demand equal access to health services. Community-based interventions based on building women's groups for awareness generation on maternal and child health (MCH) are the best and cost-effective approaches in improving their access to health services. The present study evaluated a community-based intervention aimed at improving marginalized women's awareness and utilization of MCH services, and access to livelihood and savings using the peer-led approach from two districts of India.MethodsWe used peer educators as mediators of knowledge transfer among women and for creating a supportive environment at the household and community levels. The intervention was implemented in two marginalized districts of Uttar Pradesh, namely Banda and Kaushambi. Two development blocks in each of the two districts were selected randomly, and 24 villages in each of the four blocks were selected based on the high percentage of a marginalized population. The evaluation of the intervention involved a non-experimental, 'post-test analysis of the project group' research design, in a mixed-method approach. Data were collected at two points in time, including qualitative interviews at the end line and tracking data of the intervention population (n = 37,324) through an online management information system.ResultsMost of the women in Banda (90%) and Kaushambi (85%) attended at least 60% of the education sessions. Around 39% of women in Banda and 35% of women in Kaushambi registered for the livelihood scheme, and 94 and 80% of them had worked under the scheme in these two places, respectively. Women's awareness about MCH seemed to have increased post-intervention. The money earned after getting work under the livelihood scheme or from daily savings was deposited in the bank account by the women. These savings helped the women investing money at times of need, such as starting their work, in emergencies for the medical treatment of their family members, education of their children, etc. CONCLUSION: Peer-led model of intervention can be explored to improve the combined health and economic outcomes of marginalized women.