Dataset Information

Patterns of pathologic lymph nodes in anal cancer: a PET-CT-based analysis with implications for radiotherapy treatment volumes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This study investigates the patterns of PET-positive lymph nodes (LNs) in anal cancer. The aim was to provide information that could inform future anal cancer radiotherapy contouring guidelines.

Methods

The baseline [18F]-FDG PET-CTs of 190 consecutive anal cancer patients were retrospectively assessed. LNs with a Deauville score (DS) of ≥3 were defined as PET-positive. Each PET-positive LN was allocated to a LN region and a LN sub-region; they were then mapped on a standard anatomy reference CT. The association between primary tumor localization and PET-positive LNs in different regions were analyzed.

Results

PET-positive LNs (n = 412) were identified in 103 of 190 patients (54%). Compared to anal canal tumors with extension into the rectum, anal canal tumors with perianal extension more often had inguinal (P < 0.001) and less often perirectal (P < 0.001) and internal iliac (P < 0.001) PET-positive LNs. Forty-two patients had PET-positive LNs confined to a solitary region, corresponding to first echelon nodes. The most common solitary LN region was inguinal (25 of 42; 60%) followed by perirectal (26%), internal iliac (10%), and external iliac (2%). No PET-positive LNs were identified in the ischiorectal fossa or in the inguinal area located posterolateral to deep vessels. Skip metastases above the bottom of the sacroiliac joint were quite rare. Most external iliac PET-positive LNs were located posterior to the external iliac vein; only one was located in the lateral external iliac sub-region.

Conclusions

The results support some specific modifications to the elective clinical target volume (CTV) in anal cancer. These changes would lead to reduced volumes of normal tissue being irradiated, which could contribute to a reduction in radiation side-effects.

SUBMITTER: Frennered A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8063376 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Clinical trials evaluating the benefit of pelvic radiotherapy (PRT) in the radiotherapeutic management of patients with higher-risk prostate cancer have limited the superior field border to the S1/S2 or L5/S1 interspace. However, imaging and surgical series have demonstrated a high frequency of prostatic lymph node (LN) drainage beyond these landmarks.To determine the patterns of radiographically defined abdominopelvic LN failures and their potential implications for PRT field design.During 1992-2008, 2694 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with prostate/seminal vesicle-only radiotherapy without PRT. Some 156 patients had their first failure within the abdominopelvic LNs, of whom 60 had isolated failures within the pelvic LNs.A radiologist reviewed all imaging and mapped each LN failure to a template consisting of 34 abdominopelvic LN stations.The median follow-up was 8.9 yr. Of patients who experienced first recurrence in the pelvic LNs (n=60), the common iliac station was involved in 55% (n=33) of patients, including 10% (n=6) who had isolated common iliac failures. Use of a PRT field superior border of L5/S1 would fully cover only 42% of the first recurrences among these patients. Extending the field to cover the common iliac stations would increase coverage to 93% of recurrences. The presence of T3/T4 disease and omission of androgen-deprivation therapy both independently conferred an approximate fivefold increase in the likelihood of having a common iliac LN failure. Use of imaging as a surrogate for LN involvement is the primary study limitation.Pelvic LN failures frequently occur superior to the commonly used L5/S1 landmark for PRT coverage, and use of ADT may be protective of more superior LN failures. The current RTOG 0924 trial is evaluating the benefit of PRT with extended superior coverage to L4/5 when possible, which, according to our data, should significantly improve the coverage of potential sites of failure.We looked at lymph node recurrence patterns after external beam radiotherapy of the prostate in men who did not have their lymph nodes treated. We found that there was a high incidence of pelvic lymph node recurrences above the internal and external iliac lymph node regions. Therefore, the current field recommendation for pelvic lymph nodes that stops at the superior border of the internal and external iliac vessels provides inadequate coverage of common sites of cancer recurrence, namely the common iliac lymph nodes.

Project description:Accurate detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastases (LNM) through PET/CT before lymphadenectomy is crucial for successful therapy. PET/CT with choline derivatives used to be the standard tool for imaging metastases, whereas 68Ga-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) PET/CT was introduced recently. Both PET techniques were investigated with respect to what extent the detection rate of LNM depends on the size of tumor deposits (TDs) within LNM. Methods: Documenting the switch from the use of 18F-choline to 68Ga-PSMA in 2014, we used 2 patient cohorts undergoing a template lymphadenectomy because of a PET/CT indicating LNM. Forty-four and 40 patients underwent PET/CT with 18F-choline or 68Ga-PSMA ligand, respectively. In total, 226 LNM (125 18F-choline, 101 68Ga-PSMA) originated from 73 salvage lymphadenectomies at biochemical recurrence and from 11 primary lymphadenectomies at radical prostatectomy. LNM eligible for direct correlation of PET/CT to histopathology were identified from lymphadenectomies conducted in small anatomic subregions, with 1 LNM (condition 1) or 1-2 LNM (condition 2). Longitudinal and short diameters of TD within LNM were determined by histopathology, allowing linking of the size of TD in LNM to the detection threshold of PET/CT. Diameters associated with a detection rate of 50% and 90% (d50%, d90%) were calculated on the basis of logistic growth curve models fitted. Results: Gleason score, number of removed LNs, and subregions for lymphadenectomy per patient did not differ significantly between the 18F-choline and 68Ga-PSMA groups. The median prostate-specific antigen level at imaging and number of LNM per patient were significantly higher in the 18F-choline group (3.4 ng/mL, n = 34) than in the 68Ga-PSMA group (2.2 ng/mL, n = 28; both P < 0.05). Longitudinal and short diameters of TD in LNM to reach d90% were 11.2 and 7.4 mm, respectively, for 18F-choline PET/CT and 6.3 and 4.9 mm, respectively, for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Corresponding diameters to reach d50% were 5.5 and 3.3 mm, respectively, for 18F-choline PET/CT and 3.7 and 2.3 mm, respectively, for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Detection rates were significantly higher under 68Ga-PSMA (P = 0.005 and 0.04 for longitudinal and short diameter). Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is superior to 18F-choline PET/CT in the detection of LNM. Whether those results will lead to an improved patient outcome after 68Ga-PSMA PET-guided therapy needs to be investigated by further studies.