Dataset Information

Bioinformatics analysis of mRNA and miRNA microarray to identify the key miRNA-mRNA pairs in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a gynecological malignancy with the highest mortality rate. Cisplatin (DDP) based chemotherapy is a standard strategy for ovarian cancer. Despite good response rates for initial chemotherapy, almost 80% of the patients treated with DDP based chemotherapy will experience recurrence due to drug-resistant, which will ultimately result in fatality. The aim of the present study was to examine the pathogenesis and potential molecular markers of cisplatin-resistant OC by studying the differential expression of mRNAs and miRNAs between cisplatin resistant OC cell lines and normal cell lines.

Methods

Two mRNA datasets (GSE58470 and GSE45553) and two miRNA sequence datasets (GSE58469 and GSE148251) were downloaded from the Gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) were screened by the NetworkAnalyst. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis were conducted to analyze the biological functions of DEGs. The protein-protein interaction network was constructed using STRING and Cytoscape software to identify the molecular mechanisms of key signaling pathways and cellular activities. FunRich and MiRNATip databases were used to identify the target genes of the DEMs.

Results

A total of 380 DEGs, and 5 DEMs were identified. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs containing 379 nodes and 1049 edges was constructed, and 4 key modules and 24 hub genes related to cisplatin-resistant OC were screened. Two hundred ninety-nine target genes of the 5 DEMs were found out. Subsequently, one of these 299 target genes (UBB) belonging to the hub genes of GSE58470 and GSE45553 was identified by MCODE and CytoHubba,which was regulated by one miRNA (mir-454).

Conclusions

One miRNA-mRNA regulatory pairs (mir-454-UBB) was established. Taken together, our study provided evidence concerning the alteration genes involved in cisplatin-resistant OC, which will help to unravel the mechanisms underlying drug resistant.

SUBMITTER: Xue B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8063430 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Nowadays, the current bioinformatic methods have been increasingly applied in the field of oncological research. In this study, we expect a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of gastric cancer from the bioinformatic methods. By systematically addressing the differential expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) and mRNAs between gastric cancer specimens and normal gastric specimens with the application of bioinformatics tools, A total of 206 DEGs and 38 DEMs were identified. The Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) database revealed that the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were significantly enriched in biological process, molecular function and cellular component, while Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database showed DEGs were significantly enriched in 8 signal pathways. The miRNA-gene regulatory network was constructed based on 385 miRNA-gene (DEM-DEG) pairs, consisting of 35 miRNAs and 107 target genes. In the regulatory network, the top 5 up-regulated genes were Transmembrane Protease, Serine 11B (TMPRSS11B), regulator of G protein signaling 1 (RGS1), cysteine rich angiogenic inducer 61 (CYR61), inhibin subunit beta A (INHBA), syntrophin gamma 1 (SNTG1), and the top 5 down-regulated genes were tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 19 (TNFRSF19), pleckstrin homology domain containing B2 (PLEKHB2), Tax1 binding protein 3 (TAX1BP3), presenilin enhancer, gamma-secretase subunit (PSENEN), NME/NM23 nucleoside diphosphate kinase 3 (NME3). Based on the gastric cancer patient database from Kaplan-Meier Plotter tools, we found that 8 of 10 genes with most significant changes in the miRNA-gene regulatory network possessed a prognostic value for survival time of gastric cancer patients. Patients with higher level of RGS1, PLEKHB2, TAX1BP3 and PSENEN in gastric cancer had a longer survival time compared with the patients with lower level of these genes. On the contrary, patients with higher level of INHBA, SNTG1, TNFRSF19 and NME3 were found associated with a shorter survival time. In conclusion, our findings provided several potential targets regarding gastric cancer, which may result in a new strategy to treat gastric cancer from a system rather than a single-gene perspective.

Project description:PurposeMicroRNA (miRNA) function via base-pairing with complementary sequences within mRNA molecules. This study aims to identify critical miRNA-mRNA regulation pairs contributing to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) pathogenesis.Patients and methodsMiRNA and mRNA microarray and RNA-sequencing datasets were downloaded from gene expression omnibus (GEO) and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) databases. Differential miRNAs (DE-miRNAs) and mRNAs (DE-mRNAs) were screened by the GEO2R tool and R packages. DAVID, DIANA, and Hiplot tools were used to perform gene enrichment analysis. The pairs of miRNA-mRNA were screened from the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions databases (miRTarBase and TarBase). External validation was carried out in 30 pairs of LUAD tissues by quantitative reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The diagnostic value of the miRNA-mRNA regulation pairs was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Biological function assay was were also performed to confirm the function of miRNA-mRNA axis in LUAD progression. The study also performed the clinical, survival and tumor-associated phenotypic analysis of miRNA-mRNA pairs.ResultsA total of 7 miRNA and 13 mRNA expression datasets from GEO were analyzed, and 11 DE-miRNAs (5 down-regulated and 6 up-regulated in LUAD tissues) and 128 DE-mRNAs (30 up-regulated and 98 down-regulated in LUAD tissues) were identified. The pairs of miR-1-3p(down) and CENPF(up) and miR-126-5p(down) and UGT8(up) were verified in the external validation cohort (30 LUAD vs. 30 NC) using qRT-PCR. Areas under the ROC curve of the two miRNA-mRNA regulation pairs panel were 0.973 in TCGA-LUAD and 0.771 in the external validation. The DCA also showed that the miRNA-mRNA regulation pairs had an excellent diagnostic performance distinguishing LUAD from normal controls. The expression of the regulation pairs is different in different ages, TNM stages, and gender. The overexpression of miR-1-3p and miR-126-5p significantly inhibited the proliferation and migration of LUAD cells. Correlation analysis showed that CENPF correlated with prognosis and tumor immunity.ConclusionsThe research identified potential miRNA-mRNA regulation pairs, providing a new idea for exploring the genesis and development of LUAD.

Project description:Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies in the world, with morbidity and mortality ranking second among all cancers. Accumulating evidences indicate that circular RNAs (circRNAs) are closely correlated with tumorigenesis. However, the mechanisms of circRNAs still remain unclear. This study is aimed at determining hub genes and circRNAs and analyzing their potential biological functions in GC. Expression profiles of mRNAs and circRNAs were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data sets of GC and paracancer tissues. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed circRNAs (DE-circRNAs) were identified. The target miRNAs of DE-circRNAs and the bidirectional interaction between target miRNAs and DEGs were predicted. Functional analysis was performed, and the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network were established. A total of 456 DEGs and 2 DE-circRNAs were identified with 3 mRNA expression profiles and 2 circRNA expression profiles. GO analysis indicated that DEGs were mainly enriched in extracellular matrix and cell adhesion, and KEGG confirmed that DEGs were mainly associated with focal adhesion, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, extracellular matrix- (ECM)- receptor interaction, and gastric acid secretion. 15 hub DEGs (BGN, COL1A1, COL1A2, FBN1, FN1, SPARC, SPP1, TIMP1, UBE2C, CCNB1, CD44, CXCL8, COL3A1, COL5A2, and THBS1) were identified from the PPI network. Furthermore, the survival analysis indicate that GC patients with a high expression of the following 9 hub DEGs, namely, BGN, COL1A1, COL1A2, FBN1, FN1, SPARC, SPP1, TIMP1, and UBE2C, had significantly worse overall survival. The circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network was constructed based on 1 circRNA, 15 miRNAs, and 45 DEGs. In addition, the 45 DEGs included 5 hub DEGs. These results suggested that hub DEGs and circRNAs could be implicated in the pathogenesis and development of GC. Our findings provide novel evidence on the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network and lay the foundation for future research of circRNAs in GC.