Osimertinib as neoadjuvant therapy in a patient with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are approved for use in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Case presentation
Here we present a case of a African American patient with stage IIIA NSCLC treated with osimertinib in the neoadjuvant setting with concurrent radiation, followed by resection. The patient remains disease-free 4 months after surgery.Conclusion
This case report suggests that osimertinib may be effective as neoadjuvant therapy in resectable stage III disease. Additionally, we provide a summary of previous case reports and ongoing clinical trials for neoadjuvant EGFR inhibition in stage III NSCLC patients.
SUBMITTER: Chen CY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8066434 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been frequently detected in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. EGFR Exon 19Del and 21L858R mutations are the two most common EGFR mutations. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely employed to treat patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. Recently, there has been rapid growth in clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant targeted therapy, indicating good application prospects owing to high efficiency and low toxicity. Herein, we discuss the case of a 56-year-old male patient who was initially diagnosed with stage IIIA pulmonary adenocarcinoma (AJCC,8th edition) of the left lower lung with an EGFR Exon 19Del mutation. The patient was treated with osimertinib but failed to undergo timely review and surgery. Subsequently, the patient underwent two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with neoadjuvant targeted therapy. After the tumor load and size had significantly decreased, radical surgery was successfully performed under thoracoscopy. However, postoperative pathology revealed carcinosarcoma, pT2aN0M0, stage IB, and the pathological response was 50%. The present case report provides practical clinical evidence for the application of neoadjuvant targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced primary pulmonary carcinosarcoma with EGFR mutation.
| S-EPMC10036817 | biostudies-literature
Project description:MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14m) is rare and occurs in approximately 1-4% of all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and approximately 2.8% of resected stage I-III NSCLC patients. Savolitinib is an oral, potent and highly selective type Ib MET inhibitor, which has been shown to be promising activity and acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring METex14m. Most recently, many studies have been probing into the feasibility and efficacy of target therapy for perioperative application in NSCLC. Interestingly, there are very few recorded cases of such treatments. Here, we presented that systemic treatment with the MET inhibitor savolitinib before surgery could provide the potential to prolong overall survival (OS) of patients with locally advanced potentially resectable NSCLC. A 49-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IIIA (T2bN2M0) primary lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting a METex14m by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Given that the tumor load and the size of lymph nodes experienced a significant downstaging after the neoadjuvant treatment of savolitinib with 600mg once a day for 5 weeks, left lower lobectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy were successfully performed. The pathological response was 50% and the final postoperative pathological staging was pT1cN0M0, IA3 (AJCC, 8th edition). The case provides empirical basis for the neoadjuvant treatment with savolitinib in METex14m-positive locally advanced primary lung adenocarcinoma, which will offer some innovative insights and clinical evidence for more effective clinical treatment of neoadjuvant targeted therapy for METex14m-positive NSCLC.
| S-EPMC9424904 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA small proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience objective clinical benefit after neoadjuvant programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade. A neoadjuvant therapeutic regimen combining immune checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy might improve the treatment effect, but such a regimen has not been tested in patients with resectable stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC.MethodsA retrospective study of 35 patients with resectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIO) was performed. Patients were evaluated for pathological complete response (pCR), major pathologic response (MPR), safety, and feasibility. The correlations of pathologic response with various clinical factors were studied to identify predictors of pathological response.ResultsNCIO was associated with few immediate adverse events. NCIO did not delay planned surgery and led to a pCR rate of 51.43% and an MPR rate of 74.29% for the primary tumor. No association was observed between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression before NCIO and the pathologic response (Pearson's r=-0.071; P=0.685). However, a significant difference was observed in pathological response in patients with intracavitary and extracavitary tumors (P<0.05). Patients with intracavitary type had a higher pCR (76.47% vs. 31.58%) and MPR (100% vs. 50.00%) rate than patients with extracavitary type (Pearson's r=0.7280; P=0.0009).ConclusionsNCIO was associated with few side effects, did not delay surgery, and achieved a pCR in 51.43% and MPR in 74.29% of resected tumors. No significant correlation was found between pathologic response and PD-L1 expression. While the intracavitary and extracavitary tumors type T was predictive of the pathological response to NCIO.
| S-EPMC8182703 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to determine whether adjuvant therapy improves survival in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 467 consecutive patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery between 2004 and 2013. From these, we identified 398 eligible patients and their clinical outcomes were compared according to whether adjuvant therapy was provided.ResultsIn total, 296 patients (74%) received adjuvant therapy consisting of chemotherapy alone (n=71) radiotherapy alone (n=118) and both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n=107). Adjuvant therapy was not given to remaining 102 patients. Patients who receiving adjuvant therapy were significantly younger (P=0.001), and predominantly male (P=0.014) compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy. Regarding to the pathologic response, the adjuvant therapy group had a significantly poor pathologic response. However, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate did not significantly differ between the groups (adjuvant therapy group, 52.9%; no adjuvant therapy group, 54.9%; P=0.369). After adjusting for age, sex, type of operation, cell type and yp stage, adjuvant therapy was significantly associated with better OS (hazard ratio =0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92; P=0.019) and disease free survival (hazard ratio =0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P=0.006).ConclusionsOur data indicate that adjuvant therapy is more often given to patients with poor pathologic findings. Adjuvant treatment after trimodal therapy is a significant predictor of survival after adjustment of clinical variables.
| S-EPMC7330356 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has demonstrated significant benefit for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) excluding known EGFR/ALK genetic alterations. Recent evidence has shown that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could be clinically valuable in resectable localized driver gene-mutant NSCLC, though the data still lack robust support, especially for rare oncogenic mutations. Here, we report a patient with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma with a RET fusion gene and high expression of PD-L1 who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and successfully attained a pathologic complete response. The patient has survived for 12 months with no recurrence or metastases after surgery. Our case suggests that this treatment strategy may be an alternative therapeutic option for resectable RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients.
| S-EPMC10791793 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Targeted therapy has achieved great success in advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver genes, and neoadjuvant-targeted therapy is increasingly being investigated. Although neoadjuvant-targeted therapy with EGFR-TKI and ALK-TKI showed good efficacy, there is no report of neoadjuvant-targeted therapy to BRAF V600E mutation on NSCLC so far. Here, we report the first case of a successful neoadjuvant-targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors followed by radical surgical excision with major pathologic response (MPR) in a patient with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) harboring BRAF V600E mutation. The case informs us that targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors could be administrated as a neoadjuvant strategy for selected cases of NSCLC harboring BRAF V600E mutation.
| S-EPMC9393753 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Crizotinib showed significant antitumor effect in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Most recently, many studies have explored the feasibility and efficacy of target therapy for perioperative application in NSCLC. Here, we describe a female patient who was diagnosed with stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting a CCDC6-ROS1 rearrangement by high-throughput sequencing. The tumor and lymph nodes showed durable response after the treatment of crizotinib. Given that a radiological downstaging was indicated, a right lower lobectomy and systemic lymphadenectomy were successfully performed. The pathological response was 60% and the tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM) stage was ypT2bN0M0. The PD-L1 expression and activity of immunological cells were also investigated.
| S-EPMC8520795 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osimertinib (AZD9291) is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for EGFR-T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer. A high incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) during combination treatment with osimertinib and anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor has been reported. The current study presents a case of ILD development during osimertinib treatment following nivolumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) treatment. The 59-year-old female was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring a deletion in exon 19 of the EGFR gene. Following nivolumab as a sixth-line treatment, an EGFR-T790M-encoding mutation in EGFR exon 20 was identified by re-biopsy. Osimertinib was therefore initiated as a seventh-line treatment. A partial response was subsequently noted; however, 63 days after initiation of the treatment the patient presented with dyspnea with decreased oxygenation in the absence of fever and sputum. A computed tomography scan revealed the emergence of ground-glass opacities with bronchiectasis in both lungs, and a diagnosis of ILD due to osimertinib was made. Following steroid pulse therapy with discontinuation of osimertinib, the patient's chest findings and respiratory condition improved. Therefore, it is considered that anti-PD-1 therapies may be associated with a risk of ILD during subsequent osimertinib treatment.
| S-EPMC5543261 | biostudies-other
Project description:Purpose: The role of targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant field of stage IIIA epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) used as a benchmark comparator. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI) for eligible studies on NTT published before October 2020. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). Statistical analysis and bias assessment were performed by RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of 319 patients, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 2 non-randomized controlled trials, were included in the meta-analysis. Perform the second subgroup analysis after excluding 2 non-randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis reveals that, for EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIA NSCLC patients, compared with NCT, NTT can significantly increase ORR (relative risk [RR]:1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.35-2.15; subgroup-RR:1.56, 95% CI 1.23-2.0) and significantly reduce grade 3/4 AEs (RR:0.5, 95% CI 0.34-0.75; subgroup-RR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.08). The OS of the NTT arm is slightly higher, but the difference is not significant (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43-1.27; subgroup-HR: 0.64 95% CI 0.40-1.03). No difference in PFS was found (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.27-2.44). Conclusion: In neoadjuvant setting, targeted therapy has a definitive effect on patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIA NSCLC and is even better than chemotherapy in terms of toxicity and tumor response rate. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021221136.
| S-EPMC8417411 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining Endostar antiangiogenic therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC, we conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label clinical study of 30 NSCLC patients. Patients were randomly assigned to the test or control groups, which received either two cycles of an NP neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen combined with Endostar or the NP regimen alone, respectively, at a 2:1 ratio. Efficacy was assessed after 3 weeks, and surgical resection occurred within 4 weeks, in the 26 patients who successfully completed treatment. While total response rates (RR) and clinical benefit rates (CBR) did not differ between the experimental groups, total tumor regression rates (TRR) were higher in the test group than in the control group. Median DFS and OS also did not differ between the test and control groups. Clinical perioperative indicators, including intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph node groups, duration of postoperative indwelling catheter use, and time to postoperative discharge, were comparable in the test and control groups. Finally, hematological and non-hematological toxicities and postoperative pathological indicators, including down-staging ratio, complete resection ratio, and metastatic lymph node ratio, also did not differ between the groups. Overall, combining Endostar with NP neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased therapeutic efficacy without increasing adverse effects in stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02497118).
| S-EPMC5308751 | biostudies-literature