Application of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Tsai HR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8067719 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundCurrent therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may be viable alternatives.ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for AD treatment.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Web of Science, Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 1, 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing JAK inhibitors with placebo/vehicle treatment for AD patients were included. The primary study outcomes included (1) the change (%) from the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) baseline expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and (2) the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response and safety outcomes expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.ResultsWe included 14 RCTs published in 13 studies (3,822 patients). Treatment with JAK inhibitors significantly improved IGA response (RR 2.83, 95% CI 2.25-3.56, p < 0.001) and EASI score (WMD -28.82, 95% CI -34.48 to -23.16, p < 0.001). JAK inhibitor treatment achieved the largest improvement in both IGA response (RR 3.59, 95% CI 2.66-4.84, p < 0.001) and EASI score (WMD -42.00, 95% CI -48.64 to -35.36, p < 0.001) by week 4 of treatment. Topical JAK inhibitors were significantly more efficacious than oral inhibitors. Upadacitinib treatment for 4 weeks was most effective in reducing EASI score (WMD -53.92, 95% CI -69.26 to -38.58, p < 0.001), while abrocitinib for 4 weeks led to the most effective IGA response (RR 5.47, 95% CI 2.74-10.93, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation; however, JAK inhibitors use, especially abrocitinib, led to a higher incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.42, p = 0.001).ConclusionOur results imply that JAK inhibitors are an effective and safe AD treatment. Nevertheless, further trials with longer duration and head-to-head comparisons of different JAK inhibitors are needed.
| S-EPMC9393843 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceThe risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), especially when receiving treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the association of AD with incident VTE and evaluate the risk of incident VTE among patients with AD who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors.Data sourcesThe MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched with no restrictions on language nor geographic locations from their respective inception to February 5, 2022.Study selectionCohort studies examining the association of AD with incident VTE and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting VTE events in participants with AD receiving JAK inhibitors were included. Around 0.7% of initially identified articles met the selection criteria.Data extraction and synthesisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. The risk of bias of included cohort studies and RCTs was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, respectively. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and risk difference for incident VTE.Main outcomes and measuresThe HRs for incident VTE associated with AD and risk difference for incident VTE between participants with AD who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors and controls receiving placebo or dupilumab.ResultsTwo cohort studies and 15 RCTs with a total of 466 993 participants were included. The meta-analysis found no significant association of AD with incident VTE (HR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.62-1.45; incidence rate of VTE, 0.23 events/100 patient-years). Overall, 3 of 5722 patients with AD (0.05%) who were receiving treatment with JAK inhibitors experienced VTE compared with 1 of 3065 patients with AD (0.03%) receiving placebo or dupilumab (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 0; 95% CI, 0-0). The incidence rate of VTE was 0.15 and 0.12 events per 100 patient-years in participants with AD receiving JAK inhibitors and placebo, respectively. The findings were similar in 4 unique JAK inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and SHR0302).Conclusions and relevanceThe results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the currently available evidence does not detect an increased risk of VTE associated with AD or treatment with JAK inhibitors. These findings may provide a reference for clinicians in prescribing JAK inhibitors for patients with AD.
| S-EPMC9403856 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, relapsing and remitting disease that can be difficult to treat despite a recently approved biologic therapy targeting IL-4/IL-13 receptor. Oral janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) represent a novel therapeutic class of targeted therapy to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral JAKi in the treatment of AD. Methods: A PRISMA systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE (Ovid), and PubMed databases for studies assessing the efficacy, safety, and/or pharmacokinetic properties of oral forms of JAKi in the treatment of AD in pediatric or adult populations from inception to June 2021. Results: 496 papers were reviewed. Of 28 articles that underwent full text screening, 11 met our inclusion criteria for final qualitative review. Four studies examined abrocitinib; three studies examined baricitinib; three examined upadacitinib and one examined gusacitinib (ASN002). Significant clinical efficacy and a reassuring safety profile was reported for all JAKi agents reviewed. Rapid symptom control was reported for abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib. Limitations: Given the relatively limited evidence for each JAKi and the differences in patient eligibility criteria between studies, the data was not deemed suitable for a meta-analysis at this time. Conclusion: Given their ability to achieve rapid symptom control with a reassuring safety profile, we recommend considering the use of JAKi as a reliable systemic treatment option for adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, who are unresponsive to topical or skin directed treatments.
| S-EPMC8440866 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a clinically heterogenous, inflammatory skin condition with a high impact on patients' daily activities that remains difficult to treat. The knowledge acquired over the last decade on AD pathophysiology and disease burden led to the development of new targeted therapeutic options that enable clinicians to better manage AD patients. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway modulates several immune pathways (T helper (Th)1, Th2, Th17, and Th22 cells) that have been found to be involved in AD pathogenesis. For this reason, JAK inhibitors emerged as a possible therapy for AD. Baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib are the three oral JAK inhibitors already approved or in advanced clinical development for this purpose. The results showed that this drug class is highly effective achieving symptomatic relief (itch control) in the short term, as well as improving disease severity in the short and medium term. However, their efficacy should be balanced with possible side effects, that have been reported in clinical trials. More data on the long-term efficacy and safety, as well as from head-to-head comparisons and from real-world setting will be crucial to position oral JAK inhibitors in the AD therapeutic armamentarium.
| S-EPMC8648435 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThis study investigated the clinical efficacy and safety of oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) in the treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant articles written before January 29, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of oral JAKis in patients with COVID-19 were included.ResultsIn the pooled analysis of the 7 RCTs, the all-cause 28-day mortality rate in the study group receiving JAKis was significantly lower than that in the control group (9.4% [183/1941] vs. 10.9% [184/1687], risk ratio [RR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.81, I2 = 0%). In addition, the risk of 14-day mortality was in the study group was lower than that in the control group (RR = 0.65, 95% CI, 0.46-0.92, I2 = 0%). Finally, the study group and the control group exhibited similar risks of any adverse events (RR = 0.96, 95% CI, 0.89-1.04, I2 = 0%).ConclusionsOral JAKis can significantly reduce the risk of death among patients with COVID-19. In addition, JAKis are tolerable for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
| S-EPMC9381941 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Importance:Topical medication is the central treatment for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but the options are limited. Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors are a new candidate for AD therapy. Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical PDE4 inhibitors in mild to moderate AD. Data Sources:Clinical trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Chinese medical databases (Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and other trial registries from inception to August 15, 2018. No restrictions on languages were placed. Study Selection:Only double-blind randomized clinical trials with topical PDE4 inhibitors vs topical vehicle treatment for patients with mild to moderate AD were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis:Two reviewers independently extracted study features, intervention details, and outcomes. A meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Funnel plots and Egger tests were used to assess the publication bias. Main Outcomes and Measures:Changes from baseline in target lesion score were expressed in terms of standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. Outcomes of investigators' assessment and safety were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% CIs. Results:Seven studies were identified, which included 1869 patients with mild to moderate AD. Overall, compared with the topical vehicle control, topical application of PDE4 inhibitors was associated with a significant decrease in target lesion score (SMD -0.40; 95% CI, -0.61 to -0.18; P < .001) and a higher response rate in investigators' assessment of clear or almost clear skin (relative risk, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33-1.70; P < .001). There was no difference in treatment-related adverse events or in adverse events that required discontinuation of therapy. Subgroup analyses indicated that after 14 and 28 days of therapy with PDE4 inhibitors, target lesion score was significantly decreased. However, these beneficial effects were displayed only for the PDE4 inhibitors crisaborole and AN2898 (crisaborole at day 14: SMD, -0.59; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.02; P = .04; AN2898 at day 14: SMD, -0.76; 95% CI, -1.38 to -0.13; P = .02; crisaborole at day 28: SMD, -0.86; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.28; P = .004; AN2898 at day 28: SMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -1.30 to -0.05; P = .03). Heterogeneity was not significant across studies. Conclusions and Relevance:This meta-analysis suggests that topical PDE4 inhibitors are a safe and effective treatment for mild to moderate AD. Current evidence supports the use of crisaborole or AN2898 as the choice of maintenance or sequential therapy for mild to moderate AD.
| S-EPMC6507295 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAtopic dermatitis is a common inflammatory skin disorder that affects up to 15-20% of the population and is characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions with intense itching. As a heterogeneous disease, multiple factors have been suggested to explain the nature of atopic dermatitis (AD), and its high prevalence makes it necessary to periodically compile and update the new information available. In this systematic review, the focus is set at the genetic and epigenetic studies carried out in the last years.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted in three scientific publication databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus). The search was restricted to publications indexed from July 2016 to December 2019, and keywords related to atopic dermatitis genetics and epigenetics were used.ResultsA total of 73 original papers met the inclusion criteria established, including 9 epigenetic studies. A total of 62 genes and 5 intergenic regions were described as associated with AD.ConclusionFilaggrin (FLG) polymorphisms are confirmed as key genetic determinants for AD development, but also epigenetic regulation and other genes with functions mainly related to the immune system and extracellular matrix, reinforcing the notion of skin homeostasis breakage in AD.
| S-EPMC7231115 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The lack of standardized nomenclature for atopic dermatitis (AD) creates unnecessary confusion for patients, healthcare providers, and researchers. It also negatively impacts accurate communication of research in the scientific literature. We sought to determine the most commonly used terms for AD.A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (1945-2016) for the terms AD, atopic eczema (AE), and multiple other eczematous disorders.In MEDLINE, 33 060 were identified, of which 21 299 (64.4%) publications used the term 'AD', 15 510 (46.9%) 'eczema', and only 2471 (7.5%) AE. Most of these publications used the term AD (82.0%) or eczema (70.8%) without additional nomenclature; only 1.2% used AE alone. Few publications used the terminology 'childhood eczema', 'flexural eczema', 'infantile eczema', 'atopic neurodermatitis', or 'Besnier's prurigo'. AD was rarely used until the late 1970s, after which it became the most commonly used of the three terms and continuously increased until 2015. Atopic eczema decreased between 2008 and 2015. Atopic dermatitis was the most commonly used term in studies across almost all publication types, languages, and journals.Atopic dermatitis is the most commonly used term and appears to be increasing in popularity. Given that eczema is a nonspecific term that describes the morphological appearance of several forms of dermatitis, we strongly suggest the use of a more specific term, AD, in publications, healthcare clinician training, and patient education. Support from researchers, reviewers, and editors is key to success.
| S-EPMC5228598 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPatient education is crucial for improving disease outcomes in atopic dermatitis (AD). This review aims to summarize evidence about the effectiveness of educational programs for parents of pediatric AD patients.MethodsPubMed and Embase (inception to Feb 2020) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English were included. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools and quality of evidence was assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the disease severity instrument (Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis, SCORAD) and quality of life (QoL) instruments using the random-effects model.ResultsA total of 13 RCTs were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis of SCORAD contained seven studies with a total of 1853 patients. The reduction in disease severity (SCORAD) was larger in the treatment group (SMD = - 8.22, 95% CI = - 11.29, - 5.15; P < 0.001; I2 = 78.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed that the association was modified by the frequency of sessions (P for Cochran Q < 0.01) and the duration of follow-up (P for Cochran Q < 0.01). No significant effect-modification was observed for disease severity and borderline significance was observed for session delivery (individual vs group session). The pooled effect sizes for QoL measures including Dermatitis Family Index (SMD = - 0.65, 95% CI = - 1.49, 0.18), Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (SMD = - 1.61, 95% CI = - 3.76, 0.55; I2= 89.0%) and Infants' Dermatology Quality of Life Index (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI = - 1.04, 1.63; I2= 63.1%) were not significant.ConclusionsStructured patient education is beneficial and should be implemented for the management of AD patients. However, an optimal delivery mode needs to be determined.
| S-EPMC7211777 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCalcineurin inhibitors, novel topical immunomodulators, may constitute a superior alternative for glucocorticosteroids in atopic dermatitis (AD) topical treatment.AimDetermination of efficacy and safety of each topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) formulation, 0.3% or 0.1% tacrolimus and 1% pimecrolimus, for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in comparison with glucocorticosteroids.Material and methodsCochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, GREAT database, trials registers and reference lists were searched up to February 2018. Randomised controlled trials of TCI, compared to corticosteroids (TCS), reporting efficacy or safety outcomes were selected. Quality of trials and evidence of each outcome were evaluated according to Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and tools. The primary outcomes were physician's global assessment of improvement and occurrence of adverse events (AEs).ResultsFourteen trials involving 7376 children and adults with AD were included. Calcineurin inhibitors were significantly more effective than various potency TCS, neither least potent to lower mid-strength nor mid-strength to potent TCS (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44). The major AEs were skin burning and pruritus, their incidence was higher in TCI treatment (RR = 3.32, 95% CI: 2.90-3.80; RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.34-1.80).ConclusionsCalcineurin inhibitors seem to be more effective and contrarily they elicit more AEs than TCS.
| S-EPMC6986278 | biostudies-literature