Dataset Information

Non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing renal replacement therapy or comprehensive conservative management to end-stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Large international differences exist in access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities and comprehensive conservative management (CCM) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), suggesting that some patients are not receiving the most appropriate treatment. Previous studies mainly focused on barriers reported by patients or medical barriers (e.g. comorbidities) reported by nephrologists. An overview of the non-medical barriers reported by nephrologists when providing the most appropriate form of RRT (other than conventional in-centre haemodialysis) or CCM is lacking.

Methods

We searched in EMBASE and PubMed for original articles with a cross-sectional design (surveys, interviews or focus groups) published between January 2010 and September 2018. We included studies in which nephrologists reported barriers when providing RRT or CCM to adult patients with ESKD. We used the barriers and facilitators survey by Peters et al. [Ruimte Voor Verandering? Knelpunten en Mogelijkheden Voor Verbeteringen in de Patiëntenzorg. Nijmegen: Afdeling Kwaliteit van zorg (WOK), 2003] as preliminary framework to create our own model and performed meta-ethnographic analysis of non-medical barriers in text, tables and figures.

Results

Of the 5973 articles screened, 16 articles were included using surveys (n = 10), interviews (n = 5) and focus groups (n = 1). We categorized the barriers into three levels: patient level (e.g. attitude, role perception, motivation, knowledge and socio-cultural background), level of the healthcare professional (e.g. fears and concerns, working style, communication skills) and level of the healthcare system (e.g. financial barriers, supportive staff and practice organization).

Conclusions

Our systematic review has identified a number of modifiable, non-medical barriers that could be targeted by, for example, education and optimizing financing structure to improve access to RRT modalities and CCM.

SUBMITTER: de Jong RW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8075372 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:To measure health-related and care-related quality of life among informal caregivers of older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and to determine the association between caregiver quality of life and care recipient's treatment type. METHODS:A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Three renal units in the UK and Australia were included. Informal caregivers of people aged ?75?years with ESKD managed with dialysis or comprehensive conservative non-dialytic care (estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) ?10?mL/min/1.73m2) participated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using Short-Form six dimensions (SF-6D, 0-1 scale) and care-related quality of life was assessed using the Carer Experience Scale (CES, 0-100 scale). Linear regression assessed associations between care-recipient treatment type, caregiver characteristics and the SF-6D utility index and CES scores. RESULTS:Of 63 caregivers, 49 (78%) were from Australia, 26 (41%) cared for an older person managed with dialysis, and 37 (59%) cared for an older person managed with comprehensive conservative care. Overall, 73% were females, and the median age of the entire cohort was 76?years [IQR 68-81]. When adjusted for caregiver sociodemographic characteristics, caregivers reported significantly worse carer experience (CES score 15.73, 95% CI 5.78 to 25.68) for those managing an older person on dialysis compared with conservative care. However, no significant difference observed for carer HRQoL (SF-6D utility index -?0.08, 95% CI -?0.18 to 0.01) for those managing an older person on dialysis compared with conservative care. CONCLUSIONS:Our data suggest informal caregivers of older people on dialysis have significantly worse care-related quality of life (and therefore greater need for support) than those managed with comprehensive conservative care. It is important to consider the impact on caregivers' quality of life when considering treatment choices for their care recipients.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Renal replacement therapy was a lifesaving yet high-cost treatment for people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study aimed to estimate the direct medical costs per capita of ESKD by different treatment strategies: haemodialysis (HD); peritoneal dialysis (PD); kidney transplantation (KT) (in the first year); KT (in the second year), and by two urban health insurance schemes. METHODS:This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Data were obtained from outpatient and inpatient claims database of two urban health insurance from Guangzhou City, Southern China. Adult patients with HD (n?=?3765; mean age 58?years), PD (n?=?1237; 51?years), KT (first year) (n?=?117; 37?years) and KT (second?year) (n?=?41; 39?years) were identified between 2010 and 2012. The primary outcome was the annual per patient medical costs in 2013 Chinese Yuan (CNY) incurred in the outpatient and inpatient sectors. Secondary outcomes were annual outpatient visits and inpatient admissions, length of stay per admission. Generalized linear regression and bootstrapping statistical methods were used for analysis. RESULTS:The estimated average annual medical costs for patients on HD were CNY 94,760.5 (US$15,066.0), 95% Confidence Interval (CI): CNY85,166.6-106,972.2, which was higher than those for patients on PD [CNY80,762.9 (US$12,840.5), 95% CI: CNY 76,249.8-85,498.9]. The estimated annual cost ratio of HD versus PD was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.12-1.25). Among the transplanted patients, the estimated average annual medical costs in the first year were CNY132,253.0 (US$21,026.9), 95%CI: CNY114,009.9-153,858.6, and in the second year were CNY93,155.3 (US$14,810.8), 95%CI: CNY61,120.6-101,989.1. The mean annual medical costs for dialysis patients under Urban Employee-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme were significantly higher than those for patients under Urban Resident-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme (P?<?0.001). CONCLUSIONS:The direct medical costs of ESKD patients were high and different by types of renal replacement therapy and insurance. The findings can be used to conduct cost-effectiveness research on different types of RRT for ESKD patients that provides economic evidence for health policy design in China.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Although dialysis may not provide a large survival benefit for older patients with kidney failure, few are informed about conservative management. Barriers and facilitators to discussions about conservative management and nephrologists' decisions to present the option of conservative management may vary within the nephrology provider community. STUDY DESIGN:Interview study of nephrologists. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS:National sample of US nephrologists sampled based on sex, years in practice, practice type, and region. METHODOLOGY:Qualitative semistructured interviews continued until thematic saturation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH:Thematic and narrative analysis of recorded and transcribed interviews. RESULTS:Among 35 semistructured interviews with nephrologists from 18 practices, 37% described routinely discussing conservative management ("early adopters"). 5 themes and related subthemes reflected issues that influence nephrologists' decisions to discuss conservative management and their approaches to these discussions: struggling to define nephrologists' roles (determining treatment, instilling hope, and improving patient symptoms), circumventing end-of-life conversations (contending with prognostic uncertainty, fearing emotional backlash, jeopardizing relationships, and tailoring information), confronting institutional barriers (time constraints, care coordination, incentives for dialysis, and discomfort with varied conservative management approaches), conservative management as "no care," and moral distress. Nephrologists' approaches to conservative management discussions were shaped by perceptions of their roles and by a common view of conservative management as no care. Their willingness to pursue conservative management was influenced by provider- and institutional-level barriers and experiences with older patients who regretted or had been harmed by dialysis (moral distress). Early adopters routinely discussed conservative management as a way of relieving moral distress, whereas others who were more selective in discussing conservative management experienced greater distress. LIMITATIONS:Participants' views are likely most transferable to large academic medical centers, due to oversampling of academic clinicians. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings clarify how moral distress serves as a catalyst for conservative management discussion and highlight points of intervention and mechanisms potentially underlying low conservative management use in the United States.

Project description:BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated that early pre-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) nephrology care could improve postdialysis prognosis. However, less is known about the specific types of interventions responsible for the improved outcomes. We hypothesized that more frequent predialysis laboratory testing is associated with better postdialysis outcomes in incident ESRD patients.MethodsIn all, 23?089 patients with available outpatient laboratory tests performed during the 2-year predialysis (i.e. prelude) period were identified from a total of 52?172 American veterans with chronic kidney disease (CKD) transitioning to dialysis between October 2007 and September 2011. The associations between the frequency of combined laboratory tests, including serum creatinine, serum potassium and hemoglobin (test trio), with postdialysis mortality and hospitalization were examined in multivariable adjusted Cox and logistic regression models.ResultsWhen entering the 2-year prelude period, the mean age (Standard Deviation) of the patients was 66.2 (SD 11.3)?years and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 46.8 (SD 23.9)?mL/min/1.73 m2. In all, 14% of patients had the test trio performed less than twice in 24?months and 8.9% had the trio measured more often than every other month. Over a 2.5-year median postdialysis follow-up period, 15?303 (66.3%) patients died (mortality rate 260/1000 patient-years). The adjusted hazard ratio of all-cause mortality and adjusted odds ratio of the composite of hospitalization or death associated with lab testing done >12/24?months compared with 2-?4/24 months were 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.73] and 0.70 (95% CI 0.62-0.79), respectively.ConclusionsMore frequent laboratory testing in patients with advanced CKD is associated with better clinical outcomes after dialysis. Further examination in clinical trials is needed before the implementation of more frequent laboratory testing in clinical practice.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveThe identification of pathogenic variants in genes associated with chronic kidney disease can provide patients and nephrologists with actionable information to guide diagnoses and therapeutic plans. However, many nephrologists do not use genetic testing despite costs decreasing over time and more widespread availability.Study designWe conducted a survey to uncover the perceptions of general adult nephrologists about the utility of and barriers to genetic testing in clinical practice.Setting & participantsThe online survey was administered to board-certified nephrologists (n = 10,054) in the United States.Analytical approachWe analyzed demographic characteristics of the survey respondents and their responses in the context of their use of genetic testing in routine clinical practice.ResultsA total of 149 nephrologists completed the survey, with 72% (107 of 149) reporting genetic test use in their practice. On average, tests were ordered for 3.8% of their patient population. Thirty-five percent of responses from nephrologists without a history of genetic test use ranked perceived barriers as "extremely significant" compared with 23% of responses from those who had previously used genetic tests. However, both users and nonusers of genetic tests indicated high cost (users: 46%, 49 of 107; nonusers 69%, 29 of 42) and poor availability or lack of ease (users: 33%, 35 of 107; nonusers: 57%; 24 of 42) of genetic testing as the most significant perceived barriers to implementation.LimitationsThe survey used in this study was not previously validated; additionally, because of the relatively small number of responses, there might have been a selection bias among the responders.ConclusionsAlthough most nephrologists reported using genetic tests in clinical practice, high costs and poor availability or the lack of ease of use were perceived as the most important barriers to routine adoption. These observations indicate that educational programs that cover a range of topics, from genetics of chronic kidney disease to selection of the test, may help mitigate these barriers and enhance the use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Project description:ImportanceMedicare beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are a medically complex group accounting for less than 1% of the Medicare population but more than 7% of Medicare fee-for-service payments.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care (CEC) model with Medicare payments, health care use, and quality of care.Design, setting, and participantsIn this economic evaluation, a difference-in-differences design estimated the change in outcomes for 73 094 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aligned to CEC dialysis facilities between the baseline (from January 2014 to March 2015) and intervention periods (from October 2015 to December 2017) relative to 60 464 beneficiaries at matched dialysis facilities. In the CEC model, dialysis facilities, nephrologists, and other providers partner to form ESRD Seamless Care Organizations (ESCOs), specialty-oriented accountable care organizations that coordinate care for beneficiaries with ESRD. ESCOs with expenditures below a benchmark set by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are eligible to share in savings if they meet quality thresholds. A total of 685 dialysis facilities affiliated with 37 ESCOs participated in the CEC model as of January 2017. Thirteen ESCOs joined the CEC model on October 1, 2015 (wave 1), and 24 ESCOs joined on January 1, 2017 (wave 2). Patients with ESRD who were aligned with CEC dialysis facilities were compared with patients at matched dialysis facilities.Main outcomes and measuresMedicare total and service-specific payments per beneficiary per month; hospitalizations, readmissions, and emergency department visits; and select quality measures.ResultsRelative to the comparison group (n = 60 464; 55% men; mean [SD] age, 63.5 [14.4] years), total Medicare payments for CEC beneficiaries (n = 73 094; 56% men; mean [SD] age, 63.0 [14.4] years) decreased by $114 in payments per beneficiary per month (95% CI, -$202 to -$26; P = .01), associated primarily with decreases in payments for hospitalizations and readmissions. Payment reductions were offset by shared savings payments to ESCOs, resulting in net losses of $78 in payments per beneficiary per month (95% CI, -$8 to $164; P = .07). Relative to the comparison group, CEC beneficiaries had 5.01 fewer hospitalizations per 1000 beneficiaries per month (95% CI, -8.45 to -1.56; P = .004), as well as fewer catheter placements (CEC beneficiaries with catheter as vascular access for periods longer than 90 days decreased by 0.78 percentage points [95% CI, -1.36 to -0.19; P = .01]) and fewer hospitalizations for ESRD complications (CEC beneficiaries were 0.11 percentage points less likely [95% CI, -0.20 to -0.02; P = .01] to be hospitalized in a given month). Total dialysis sessions and payments increased, suggesting improved adherence to dialysis treatments.Conclusions and relevanceEarly findings from the CEC model demonstrate that a specialty accountable care organization model focused on a particular population was associated with reduced payments and improved quality of care. Future research can assess the longer-term outcomes of the CEC model and its applicability to populations with other complex chronic conditions.