Dataset Information

Analysis of antihypertensive treatment using real-world Japanese data-the retrospective study of antihypertensives for lowering blood pressure (REAL) study.

ABSTRACT: Hypertension requires strict treatment because it causes diseases that can lead to death. Although various classes of antihypertensive drugs are available, the actual status of antihypertensive drug selection and the transition in prescription patterns over time have not been fully examined. Therefore, we conducted a claims-based study using two claims databases (2008-16) to determine this status in Japan. We examined the prescription rate for each class of antihypertensive drugs in hypertensive patients and compared the patients' ages and the sizes of the medical institutions treating these patients. Among the 1 560 865 and 302 433 hypertensive patients in each database, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (>60%) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (>55%) were the most frequently prescribed classes. The prescription rate of CCBs increased and ARBs decreased with the patients' ages. Although the Japanese guidelines for management of hypertension in 2014 changed the recommendation and indicated that β-blockers should not be used as first-line drugs, their prescription status did not change during this study period up to 2016. Use of CCBs and ARBs as first-line drugs differed by the types of patient comorbidities. Although ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were recommended for patients with some comorbidities, CCBs were used relatively frequently. In conclusion, the patients' ages and comorbidities and the sizes of the medical institutions affect the selection of antihypertensive drugs. Selection and use of drugs may not always follow the guidelines.

SUBMITTER: Ohishi M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8075880 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRemote data capture for blood glucose (BG) or blood pressure (BP) monitoring and the use of a supportive digital app are becoming the model in diabetes and hypertension chronic care. One of the goals in chronic condition management is to increase awareness and generate behavioral change in order to improve outcomes in diabetes and related comorbidities, such as hypertension. In addition, there is a lack of understanding of the association between BG and BP levels when using digital health tools.ObjectiveBy applying a rigorous study framework to digital health data, this study investigated the relationship between BP monitoring and BG and BP levels, as well as a lagged association between BP and BG. We hypothesized that during the first 6 months of BP monitoring, BG and BP levels would decrease. Finally, we suggested a positive association between BP levels and the following month's BG levels.MethodsIn this retrospective, real-world case-control study, we extracted the data of 269 people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who tracked their BG levels using the Dario digital platform for a chronic condition. We analyzed the digital data of the users who, in addition to BG, monitored their BP using the same app (BP-monitoring [BPM] group, n=137) 6 months before and after starting their BP monitoring. Propensity score matching established a control group, no blood pressure monitoring (NBPM, n=132), matched on demographic and baseline clinical measures to the BPM group. A piecewise mixed model was used for analyzing the time trajectories of BG, BP, and their lagged association.ResultsAnalysis revealed a significant difference in BG time trajectories associated with BP monitoring in BPM and NBPM groups (t=-2.12, P=.03). The BPM group demonstrated BG reduction improvement in the monthly average BG levels during the first 6 months (t=-3.57, P<.001), while BG did not change for the NBPM group (t=0.39, P=.70). Both groups showed similarly stable BG time trajectories (B=0.98, t=1.16, P=.25) before starting the use of the BP-monitoring system. In addition, the BPM group showed a significant reduction in systolic (t=-6.42, P<.001) and diastolic (t=-4.80, P<.001) BP during the first 6 months of BP monitoring. Finally, BG levels were positively associated with systolic (B=0.24, t=2.77, P=.001) and diastolic (B=0.30, t=2.41, P=.02) BP.ConclusionsThe results of this study shed light on the association between BG and BP levels and on the role of BP self-monitoring in diabetes management. Our findings also underscore the need and provide a basis for a comprehensive approach to understanding the mechanism of BP regulation associated with BG.

Project description:IntroductionCigarette smoking affects blood pressure and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The role of smoking cessation programs with respect to blood pressure remains inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the effects of a smoking cessation program on blood pressure.MethodsParticipants who attended the smoking cessation program in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary medical center in Taiwan from 2017 to 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Their smoking cessation status was traced via phone calls during the third month, and the researchers collected participant characteristics and blood pressure before and after the program. Differences in the participants' blood pressure, based on those with and those without hypertension, were compared using analysis of covariance. Univariable logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with success in smoking cessation. In total, there were 721 participants. The participants had a mean age of 55.8±11.4 years and 68.1% of the participants were hypertensive.ResultsDuring the program, the overall systolic blood pressure decreased by 4.0±17.9 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 2.5±12.0 mmHg, from the baseline. Hypertensive participants showed a more prominent blood pressure lowering effect compared to non-hypertensive participants in terms of the subtraction difference of systolic blood pressure (-5.0±19.0 vs -1.9±15.2 mmHg, p=0.018) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.1±12.9 vs -1.1±9.6 mmHg, p=0.016). After multivariate control, the results showed that the adjusted subtraction difference of diastolic blood pressure was still more significant in the hypertensive group than in the non-hypertensive group.ConclusionsThe smoking cessation program significantly reduced both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in the entire cohort. The results were more significant in the hypertensive group compared to the non-hypertensive group.

Project description:BackgroundGeneric drugs are bioequivalent to their brand-name counterparts; however, concerns still exist regarding the effectiveness and safety of generic drugs because of small sample sizes and short follow-up time in most studies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term antihypertensive efficacy, cost-effectiveness and cardiovascular outcomes of generic drugs compared with brand-name drugs.MethodsIn a multicenter, community-based study including 7955 hypertensive patients who were prospectively followed up for an average of 2.5 years, we used the propensity-score-matching method to match the patients using brand-name drugs to those using generic drugs in a ratio of 1:2, 2176 patients using brand-name drugs and 4352 patients using generic drugs.ResultsThere were no significant differences between generic drugs and brand-name drugs in blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy, BP control rate, and cardiovascular outcomes including coronary heart disease and stroke. The adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) of systolic BP (SBP)-lowering was -7.9 mmHg (95% CI, -9.9 to -5.9) in the brand-name drug group and -7.1 mmHg (95% CI, -9.1 to -5.1) in the generic drug group after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, number of antihypertensive drugs and traditionally cardiovascular risk factors. Among patients aged <60 years, brand-name drugs had a higher BP control rate (47% vs. 41%; P = 0.02) and a greater effect in lowering SBP compared with generic drugs, with the between-group difference of 1.5 mmHg (95% CI, 0.2-2.8; P = 0.03). BP control rate was higher in male patients using brand-name drugs compared with those using generic drugs (46% vs. 40%; P = 0.01). Generic drugs treatment yielded an average annual incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $315.4 per patient per mmHg decrease in SBP compared with brand-name drugs treatment.ConclusionsOur data suggested that generic drugs are suitable and cost-effective in improving hypertension management and facilitating public health benefits, especially in low- and middle-income areas.

Project description:IntroductionThe effectiveness of telmisartan has been reported in Indian clinical trials; however, real-world data are limited. We aimed to provide real-world evidence regarding the effectiveness of telmisartan as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) in Indian patients with essential hypertension.MethodsElectronic medical record data of adult patients diagnosed with essential hypertension (≥ 140/90 mmHg) and who were prescribed telmisartan as mono- or add-on therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the number of AHD classes prescribed on initiating telmisartan. Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) after a month of treatment and the proportion of patients who achieved treatment goals according to the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension guidelines were evaluated.ResultsA majority (90.6%) of the 1304 patients included in the study were on telmisartan monotherapy or telmisartan + 1 AHD. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) change in the telmisartan monotherapy group was SBP (-13.3 [-14.6, -12.0] mmHg) and DBP (-7.2 [-7.9, -6.5] mmHg), and the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan + 1 AHD group was SBP (-10.8 [-13.1, -8.5] mmHg) and DBP (-6.5 [-7.7, -5.3] mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 35.9% and 47.3% of patients on telmisartan monotherapy and by 35.9% and 46.8% of patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD. Among patients with comorbid diabetes, the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan monotherapy group was SBP (-13.3 [-15.0, -11.6] mmHg) and DBP (-7.3 [-8.2, -6.5] mmHg), and the mean (95% CI) change in the telmisartan + 1 AHD group was SBP (-13.0 [-16.5, -9.5] mmHg) and DBP (-6.9 [-8.7, -5.1] mmHg) (P < 0.001 for all). SBP and DBP goals were achieved by 31.7% and 39.7% of patients on telmisartan monotherapy and by 31.9% and 41.8% of patients on telmisartan + 1 AHD.ConclusionTelmisartan may be a good candidate for blood pressure control in Indian patients with essential hypertension and comorbidities.

Dataset Information

Analysis of antihypertensive treatment using real-world Japanese data-the retrospective study of antihypertensives for lowering blood pressure (REAL) study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets