Dataset Information

Metaplastic breast cancer: Treatment and prognosis by molecular subtype.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of breast. However, the effect of molecular subtype on treatment and prognosis of MBC remains unclear.

Patients and methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to analyze patients with MBC between 2010 and 2016. Molecular subtype was stratified to TN group (ER and PR-/HER2-), HER2 group (ER and PR-/HER2+, ER/PR+ and HER2+), and HR group (ER/PR+ and HER2-). The breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) differences were estimated using multivariate Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

We included 1665 patients with median follow-up time of 27 months (range 0-83 months). 1154 (69.3%), 65 (3.9%), and 446 (26.8%) patients presented in TN group, HER2 group, and HR group, respectively. On multivariate Cox analysis, the prognosis was related to age, tumor size, regional node metastasis, and surgery. Molecular subtype remained no impact on BCSS. Radiotherapy (RT) was associated with better prognosis. Patients cannot benefit from chemotherapy. In Kaplan-Meier curve, triple-negative (P = 0.047) and HR-positive (P = 0.006) patients receiving RT had a superior BCSS than that not RT. HER2-positive patients cannot benefit from RT. However, adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival model showed that triple-negative (P = 0.019) but not HER2-positive (P = 0.575) or HR-positive (P = 0.574) patients receiving RT had a superior BCSS than that not RT.

Conclusions

Molecular subtype is not associated with the better prognosis of MBC. Patients could benefit from RT. However, triple-negative but not HR-positive or HER2-positive patients have superior survival after receiving RT.

SUBMITTER: Hu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8079171 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: Metaplastic breast cancer (BC) is an uncommon yet aggressive histologic subtype of BC. We sought to identify factors associated with its diagnosis and compare the management and outcomes of metaplastic BC with those of other BCs and triple negative invasive ductal carcinoma in particular given how often it has a triple negative phenotype. Patients and Methods: We identified women diagnosed with invasive BC in 2010-2014 in the National Cancer Data Base, and used univariate analysis to compare baseline patient and tumor characteristics by BC subtype. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of OS. Results: Of 247,355 cases, 2,084 (0.8%) were metaplastic BC, 55,998 (23%) triple negative BC, and 77% other BC. Relative to non-metaplastic BC, women with metaplastic BC were more likely to be older at diagnosis (median age, 62 vs. 59 years), have ?1 comorbid conditions (22% vs. 18%), and be on Medicare (41% vs. 33%; P<0.001). Metaplastic BCs tended to be basal-like (77%), and relative to triple-negative or other BC, metaplastic BC was associated with higher clinical T status (cT3-4, 18% vs. 11%, 8%), no clinical nodal involvement (cN0, 86%, 77%, 80%), no lymphovascular invasion (72%, 65%, 62%), and high-grade tumors (71%, 77%, 35%) (P<0.001). Most metaplastic BCs were treated with mastectomy (58%), sentinel lymph node dissection (65%), chest wall or breast irradiation (74%), and chemotherapy (75%) as adjuvant therapy (60%). At a median follow-up time of 44.5 months, OS rates were lower for metaplastic BC than for triple-negative or other BC across all clinical stages at 5 years (stage I, 85%, 87%, 91%; II, 73%, 77%, 87%; III, 43%, 53%, 75%) and at 3 years (Stage IV, 15%, 22%, 64%; P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, advanced clinical stage, lymphovascular invasion, axillary (vs. sentinel) node dissection, and no radiation or chemotherapy were associated with worse outcomes in metaplastic BC. Extent of surgery affected survival for triple-negative and other BC but not for metaplastic BC. Conclusion: Outcomes for metaplastic BC continue to be worse than those for other BC subtypes despite modern treatments. Optimizing systemic therapy options, which was a significant predictor of survival, should be a priority in managing metaplastic BC.