Dataset Information

Intraoperative Radiographic Detection of Intrapelvic Acetabular Screw Penetration: Lessons Learned From Our Trauma Colleagues.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Intraoperative vascular injury during total hip arthroplasty represents a catastrophic complication. Acetabular screw placement represents one possible mode of injury. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of various fluoroscopic views in the detection of intrapelvic screw penetration.

Methods

A radiopaque pelvis Sawbones model was instrumented with a hemispherical acetabular component. Four intrapelvic quadrants were defined. Screws were placed, 3 in each quadrant, and imaged sequentially at 3 depths: 0 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm penetrated. Eight fluoroscopic images were used: anteroposterior, inlet, outlet, iliac oblique, obturator oblique, "down the wing," obturator outlet, and a "quad" view. Three blinded, independent surgeons evaluated the images for intrapelvic screw penetration. Images were analyzed in isolation and as a "triple-shot series" consisting of the "quad," obturator outlet, and iliac oblique views. Sensitivity and specificity values were then calculated.

Results

In isolation, the "quad" view had the highest sensitivity for screw penetration (62%). The triple-shot series was found to be 100% sensitive in all 4 quadrants for detecting 10 mm of screw penetration. The specificity of the series was found to be 100% in all quadrants except for the posterior superior quadrant where it was 67%. Interobserver agreement approached perfection (Kappa ≥0.947) between all surgeons (P < .001) when using the 3-view series.

Conclusions

This study is the first to assess the use of fluoroscopy in the detection of intrapelvic penetration of transacetabular screws. We found that a 3-radiograph series provided a sensitive and specific metric for the detection of intrapelvic screw penetration.

SUBMITTER: Wilson JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8079330 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTrauma related deaths remain a relevant public health problem, in particular in the younger male population. A significant number of these deaths occur prehospitally without transfer to a hospital. These patients, sometimes termed "the forgotten cohort", are usually not included in clinical registries, resulting in a lack of information about prehospitally trauma deaths. The aim of the present study was to compare patients who died prehospital with those who sustained life-threatening injuries in order to analyze and potentially improve prehospital strategies.MethodsThis cohort study included all primary operations carried out by Switzerland's largest helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. We included all adult trauma patients with life-threatening or fatal conditions. The outcome of this study is the vital status of the patient at the end of mission, i.e. fatal or life-threatening. Injury, rescue characteristics, and interventions of the forgotten trauma cohort, defined as patients with a fatal injury (NACA score of VII), were compared with life-threatening injuries (NACA score V and VI).ResultsOf 110,331 HEMS missions, 5534 primary operations were finally analyzed, including 5191 (93.8%) life-threatening and 343 (6.2%) fatal injuries. More than two-thirds of patients (n = 3772, 68.2%) had a traumatic brain injury without a significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Thoracic trauma (44.6% vs. 28.7%, p < 0.001) and abdominal trauma (22.2% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.004) were more frequent in fatal missions whereas pelvic trauma was similar between the two groups (13.4% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.788). Pneumothorax decompression rate (17.2% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001) was higher in the forgotten cohort group and measures for bleeding control (15.2% vs. 42.7%, p < 0.001) and pelvic belt application (2.9% vs. 13.1% p < 0.001) were more common in the life-threating injury group.ConclusionChest decompression rates and measures for early hemorrhage control are areas for potential improvement in prehospital care.

Project description:INTRODUCTION: Extensor tendon irritation and attritional tendon ruptures are potentially serious complications after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures. These complications are well recognized after dorsal plating of distal radii; and these are now being reported after errant screw placement during volar fixed-angle plating. Intraoperative detection of improper screw placement is critical, as corrective action can be taken before completion of the operative procedure. The purpose of this study was to define the extensor tendon compartments at risk secondary to dorsal screw penetration and to compare pronation and supination fluoroscopic images with standard lateral images in demonstrating dorsal screw prominence during volar locked plating. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric upper extremities underwent fixation with a volar, fixed-angle distal radius locked plate (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN). Three fluoroscopic views (lateral, supinated, and pronated) followed by dorsal wrist dissections were compared to determine accuracy in detecting dorsal screw prominence and extensor tendon compartment violation. Subsequently, screws measuring 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10(mm longer than the measured depths were sequentially inserted into each distal locking screw, with each image deemed either "in" (completely inside the bone) or "out" (prominent screw tip dorsally-would typically be exchanged for a shorter screw intraoperatively). RESULTS: The radial most distal locking screw (position 1) violated either the first (25%) or second (75%) extensor tendon compartments. The average screw prominence required for radiographic detection was: 6.5(mm for lateral views and 2(mm for supinated views. Pronated views did not identify prominent screws. Screws occupying plate position 2 consistently entered Lister's tubercle, with 5/8 exiting the apex and 3/8 exiting the radial base. The average screw prominences for radiographic detection were: 2.75(mm-lateral views and 3.0(mm-supinated views. Although the screws entered the second dorsal compartment, they did not encroach upon either of the tendons. Screws occupying plate position 3 violated the third extensor tendon compartment in 7/8 specimens with 1/8 exiting the Ulan base of Lister's tubercle. The average screw prominences for radiographic detection were: 3.5(mm-lateral views and 2.5(mm-pronated views. Supinated views did not identify prominent hardware. Screws occupying plate position 4 all violated the IV dorsal extensor compartment-2/8 screws were noted to tent the posterior interosseous nerve. The average screw prominences required for radiographic detection were: 4.0(mm-lateral views and 2.5(mm-pronated views. The supinated views did not identify prominent screws. CONCLUSIONS: Volar fixed-angle plating has shown great promise in the advancement of distal radius fracture management. We have seen in our referral practices and in the literature an increase in the number of extensor tendon complications arising from unrecognized dorsally prominent screws, pegs, or tines. Standard PA and lateral radiographs cannot adequately visualize screw position and length secondary to the complex geometry of the dorsal cortex. We believe this study supports the routine application of intraoperative, oblique pronosupination fluoroscopic imaging for enhanced confirmation of distal locking screw position and length.

Project description:IntroductionFor children who present to emergency departments (EDs) due to blunt head trauma, ED clinicians must decide who requires computed tomography (CT) scanning to evaluate for traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) derived and validated two age-based prediction rules to identify children at very low risk of clinically-important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBIs) who do not typically require CT scans. In this case report, we describe the strategy used to implement the PECARN TBI prediction rules via electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support (CDS) as the intervention in a multicenter clinical trial.MethodsThirteen EDs participated in this trial. The 10 sites receiving the CDS intervention used the Epic(®) EHR. All sites implementing EHR-based CDS built the rules by using the vendor's CDS engine. Based on a sociotechnical analysis, we designed the CDS so that recommendations could be displayed immediately after any provider entered prediction rule data. One central site developed and tested the intervention package to be exported to other sites. The intervention package included a clinical trial alert, an electronic data collection form, the CDS rules and the format for recommendations.ResultsThe original PECARN head trauma prediction rules were derived from physician documentation while this pragmatic trial led each site to customize their workflows and allow multiple different providers to complete the head trauma assessments. These differences in workflows led to varying completion rates across sites as well as differences in the types of providers completing the electronic data form. Site variation in internal change management processes made it challenging to maintain the same rigor across all sites. This led to downstream effects when data reports were developed.ConclusionsThe process of a centralized build and export of a CDS system in one commercial EHR system successfully supported a multicenter clinical trial.