Dataset Information

Performance Evaluation of BD Phoenix NMIC-413 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Panel for Imipenem, Meropenem, and Ertapenem Against Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant and Carbapenem-Susceptible Enterobacterales.

ABSTRACT: Purpose: The infection of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) has become a major clinical and healthcare problem worldwide. The screening methods of CRE have been extensively developed but still need improving [e.g., tests with accurate and simple minimum inhibitory (MICs)]. In this study, the performance of the BD Phoenix NMIC-413 AST panel was evaluated against clinical CRE and carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) in China. The panel was first evaluated in the Chinese clinical lab. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 303 clinical Enterobacterales isolates were conducted by broth microdilution (BMD), Phoenix NMIC-413 AST panel, and disk diffusion method for imipenem, ertapenem, and meropenem. Considering BMD is a gold standard, essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor error (MIE), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were determined according to CLSI guidelines. CA and EA > 90%, ME <3%, and VME <1.5% were considered as acceptable criteria. Polymerase chain reaction and sanger sequencing were performed to determine the β-lactamase genotypes of CRE isolates. Results: Three hundred and three isolates included 195 CREs and 108 CSEs were enrolled according to the BMD-MIC values of three carbapenems. Tested CREs showing 100 bla _KPC-2-positive organisms, 31 bla _IMP-positive organisms, 28 bla _NDM-positive organisms, 5 bla _VIM-positive organisms, 2 both bla _IMP and bla _VIM-positive organisms, 2 bla _OXA-48-positive organisms, and 27 isolates without carbapenemase genes. For the Phoenix NMIC-413 method, CA and EA rates >93%, MIE rates <5%, ME rates <1.75%, and VME rates were 0%, across the three drugs. For the disk diffusion method, the CA rates for three drugs were all >93%, while the MIE and ME rates were all <5 and <3%, respectively. VME rate was 3.28% for imipenem, exceeded the cut-off value specified by CLSI M52, 0 and 0.56% for ertapenem and meropenem, separately. Conclusion: Based on the genomic data, the detection of CRE and CSE was more reliable using the BD Phoenix NMIC-413 panel compared to the BMD and disk approaches. Therefore, our study supports the use of BD Phoenix NMIC-413 panel as a suitable alternative to BMD for the detection of carbapenem resistant isolates in a clinical setting.

SUBMITTER: Zhang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8079628 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), specifically those resistant to only ertapenem among carbapenems (ETP-mono-resistant), are increasingly reported, while the optimal therapy options remain uncertain. To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of ETP-mono-resistant CRE, CRE strains were systematically collected from 102 hospitals across China between 2018 and 2021. A 1:1 randomized matching study was conducted with ETP-mono-resistant strains to meropenem- and/or imipenem-resistant (MEM/IPM-resistant) strains. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, carbapenem-hydrolysing activity and the expression of carbapenemase genes were determined. In total, 18.8% of CRE strains were ETP-mono-resistant, with relatively low ertapenem MIC values. ETP-mono-resistant strains exhibited enhanced susceptibility to β-lactams, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, amikacin and polymyxin than MEM/IPM-resistant strains (P < 0.05). Phylogenetic analysis revealed high genetic diversity among ETP-mono-resistant strains. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or AmpC, as well as porin mutations, were identified as potential major mechanisms mediating ETP-mono-resistance, while the presence of carbapenemases was found to be the key factor distinguishing the carbapenem-resistant phenotypes between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the MEM/IPM-resistant group, limited carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) strains in the ETP-mono-resistant group showed a significantly lower prevalence of ESBLs and porin mutations, along with reduced expression of carbapenemase. Remarkably, spot assays combined with modified carbapenem inactivation method indicated that ETP-mono-resistant CP-CRE isolates grew at meropenem concentrations eightfold above their corresponding MIC values, accompanied by rapidly enhanced carbapenem-hydrolysing ability. These findings illustrate that ETP-mono-resistant CRE strains are relatively prevalent and that caution should be exercised when using meropenem alone for treatment. The detection of carbapenemase should be prioritized.

Project description:BackgroundIn Japan, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections were incorporated into the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID) in 2014, necessitating mandatory reporting of all CRE infections cases. Subsequently, pathogen surveillance was initiated in 2017, which involved the collection and analysis of CRE isolates from reported cases to assess carbapenemase gene possession. In this surveillance, CRE is defined as (i) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of meropenem ≥2 mg/L (MEPM criteria) or (ii) MIC of imipenem ≥2 mg/L and MIC of cefmetazole ≥64 mg/L (IPM criteria). This study examined whether the current definition of CRE surveillance captures cases with a clinical and public health burden.MethodsCRE isolates from reported cases were collected from the public health laboratories of local governments, which are responsible for pathogen surveillance. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were conducted on these isolates to assess compliance with the NESID CRE definition. The NESID data between April 2017 and March 2018 were obtained and analyzed using antimicrobial susceptibility test results.ResultsIn total, 1681 CRE cases were identified during the study period, and pathogen surveillance data were available for 740 (44.0%) cases. Klebsiella aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae complex were the dominant species, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The rate of carbapenemase gene positivity was 26.5% (196/740), and 93.4% (183/196) of these isolates were of the IMP type. Meanwhile, 315 isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Among them, 169 (53.7%) fulfilled only the IPM criteria (IPM criteria-only group) which were susceptible to meropenem, while 146 (46.3%) fulfilled the MEPM criteria (MEPM criteria group). The IPM criteria-only group and MEPM criteria group significantly differed in terms of carbapenemase gene positivity (0% vs. 67.8%), multidrug resistance rates (1.2% vs. 65.8%), and mortality rates (1.8% vs 6.9%).ConclusionThe identification of CRE cases based solely on imipenem resistance has had a limited impact on clinical management. Emphasizing resistance to meropenem is crucial in defining CRE, which pose both clinical and public health burden. This emphasis will enable the efficient allocation of limited health and public health resources and preservation of newly developed antimicrobials.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Increasing prevalence of ertapenem-resistant, carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae (ERE) in Singapore presents a major therapeutic problem. Our objective was to determine risk factors associated with the acquisition of ERE in hospitalized patients; to assess associated patient outcomes; and to describe the molecular characteristics of ERE. METHODS: A retrospective case-case-control study was conducted in 2009 at a tertiary care hospital. Hospitalized patients with ERE and those with ertapenem-sensitive Enterobacteriaceae (ESE) were compared with a common control group consisting of patients with no prior gram-negative infections. Risk factors analyzed included demographics; co-morbidities; instrumentation and antibiotic exposures. Two parallel multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify independent variables associated with ERE and ESE acquisition respectively. Clinical outcomes were compared between ERE and ESE patients. RESULTS: Twenty-nine ERE cases, 29 ESE cases and 87 controls were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression showed that previous hospitalization (Odds ratio [OR], 10.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-49.20) and duration of fluoroquinolones exposure (OR, 1.18 per day increase; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34) were unique independent predictors for acquiring ERE. Duration of 4(th)-generation cephalosporin exposure was found to predict for ESE acquisition (OR, 1.63 per day increase; 95% CI, 1.05-2.54). In-hospital mortality rates and clinical response rates were significantly different between ERE and ESE groups, however ERE infection was not a predictor of mortality. ERE isolates were clonally distinct. Ertapenem resistance was likely to be mediated by the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases or plasmid-borne AmpC in combination with impermeability due to porin loss and/or efflux pumps. CONCLUSION: Prior hospitalization and duration of fluoroquinolone treatment were predictors of ERE acquisition. ERE infections were associated with higher mortality rates and poorer clinical response rates when compared to ESE infections.

Project description:The activities of meropenem-vaborbactam and comparators against 152 (1.1%) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates identified among 13,929 Enterobacterales isolates collected from U.S. hospitals during 2016 to 2018 were evaluated. CRE rates were higher in the Middle Atlantic census division (3.5%) than in the other divisions (range, 0.0% for the West North Central division to 1.4% for the West South Central division). Among the CRE isolates, 134 carried carbapenemase genes, and these included 72 isolates carrying blaKPC-3, 51 isolates carrying blaKPC-2, 4 isolates carrying blaNDM-1, 3 isolates carrying blaSME-4, 2 isolates carrying blaVIM-1, 1 isolate carrying blaOXA-232, and 1 isolate carrying blaKPC-4 Meropenem-vaborbactam was active against 95.4% of the CRE isolates and 94.8% of the carbapenem-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolates when applying the CLSI breakpoints. All isolates producing serine carbapenemases were inhibited by meropenem-vaborbactam at ≤8 mg/liter. One Citrobacter freundii isolate carrying blaKPC-3 had a meropenem-vaborbactam MIC of 8 mg/liter and was resistant according to CLSI breakpoints (the isolate was susceptible when the EUCAST criterion of an MIC of ≤8 mg/liter for susceptible was applied), had disrupted OmpC and OmpF sequences, and overexpressed AcrAB-TolC. All carbapenemase-negative CRE isolates (n = 18) were inhibited by meropenem-vaborbactam at ≤4 mg/liter, and the MIC values of this combination ranged from 0.25 to 4 mg/liter. Among 7 isolates carrying metallo-β-lactamases and/or oxacillinases with carbapenemase activity, meropenem-vaborbactam susceptibility was 14.3% and 57.1% when applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. CRE isolates were resistant to many comparator agents, and the most active agents were tigecycline, colistin, and amikacin (to which 63.2% to 96.7% of the isolates were susceptible). Understanding the epidemiology of CRE isolates in U.S. hospitals and the resistance mechanisms among these isolates is important to form guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms, which have high mortality rates.

Dataset Information

Performance Evaluation of BD Phoenix NMIC-413 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Panel for Imipenem, Meropenem, and Ertapenem Against Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant and Carbapenem-Susceptible Enterobacterales.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets