Dataset Information

Measuring Processes of Integrated Care for Hospital to Home Transitions.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Integrated care is a promising approach to improve transitions from hospital for older adults. Measures of integrated care tend to be survey-based or outcomes focused. This study determined the feasibility of using hospital chart data to measure integrated processes of care.

Methods

This paper reports on two objectives: 1) the development of an integrated care transition framework and associated features of care; 2) a pilot study to test if the features could be applied to 214 hospital patient charts.

Results

Twenty-four features were tested, and fifteen features could be reliably measured using chart review. Of these, the percent of patients classified as receiving integrated care varied widely across the items, from 0.05% to 84.1%.

Discussion

The framework presented in this paper can guide measurement of system and clinical delivery of integrated care transitions. In combination with other tools, chart review can provide perspective on day-to-day care delivery not otherwise accessible, and highlight areas requiring practice change.

Conclusion

Multiple measurement perspectives are needed to improve our understanding of how integrated care is being implemented. While chart review cannot address the full breadth of integrated care, it can help understand how processes of care are being implemented in routine daily care.

SUBMITTER: Brown CL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8086722 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceUnderstanding the patient's perspective of their care transition process from hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) to home may highlight gaps in care and inform system improvements.ObjectiveTo gather data about patients' care transition experiences and factors associated with follow-up appointment completion.Design, setting, and participantsA survey tool was developed with input from patient advisors and organizations participating in a collaborative quality initiative. Seventeen hospitals, 12 practitioner organizations, and 6 SNFs in Michigan collaborated to identify shared patients who were aged 18 years and older, had a working telephone number, recently returned home or to an assisted living facility with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or after an SNF stay. Using consecutive sampling, interviewers collected 5 telephone surveys per month. From October 2018 to December 2019, patients or caregivers were surveyed via telephone 8 to 12 days after discharge from a hospital or SNF. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to January 2022.ExposureCare transition experiences.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was to identify patient-perceived gaps during care transition experiences, including postdischarge follow-up.ResultsOn the basis of pilot data, the response rate was estimated at 34%, yielding 1257 surveys. Of 1257 survey respondents (mean [SD] age, 70 [12.94] years for 968 patients for whom age data was available), 654 (52%) were female; 829 (74%) were White, 250 (22%) were Black or African American, and 40 (4%) were another race. Eleven percent of patients reported not receiving a telephone number to call for postdischarge questions. Nearly 80% of patients (977 patients) received a follow-up telephone call, and most found it valuable. Twenty percent of patients (255 patients) reported at least 1 social determinant of health issue. Lack of transportation was associated with reduced likelihood of completing a follow-up visit, decreasing the odds of completing a follow-up by nearly 70% (odds ratio [OR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18-0.53; P < .001). Compared with other patient groups, Black patients were less likely to report completing a postdischarge follow-up visit (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67; P < .001) or to receive prescribed medical equipment (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 1.30-13.83; P = .02).Conclusions and relevanceAn examination of patient discharge experiences from a hospital or SNF identified inconsistencies in care transition processes, social determinants of health issues needing to be addressed after discharge, and racial disparities between patients who attend follow-up appointments. Physicians should be aware of these findings and their consequences for patient experiences.

Project description:BackgroundThe policy in a number of countries is to provide people with a terminal illness the choice of dying at home. This policy is supported by surveys indicating that the general public and people with a terminal illness would prefer to receive end-of-life care at home. This is the fourth update of the original review.ObjectivesTo determine if providing home-based end-of-life care reduces the likelihood of dying in hospital and what effect this has on patients' symptoms, quality of life, health service costs, and caregivers, compared with inpatient hospital or hospice care.Search methodsWe searched the following databases until April 2015: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE(R) (from 1950), EMBASE (from 1980), CINAHL (from 1982), and EconLit (from 1969). We checked the reference lists of potentially relevant articles identified and handsearched palliative care publications, clinical trials registries, and a database of systematic reviews for related trials (PDQ-Evidence 2015).Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials, interrupted time series, or controlled before and after studies evaluating the effectiveness of home-based end-of-life care with inpatient hospital or hospice care for people aged 18 years and older.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We combined the published data for dichotomous outcomes using fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis. When combining outcome data was not possible, we reported the results from individual studies.Main resultsWe included four trials in this review and did not identify new studies from the search in April 2015. Home-based end-of-life care increased the likelihood of dying at home compared with usual care (risk ratio (RR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 1.55, P = 0.0002; Chi(2) = 1.72, df = 2, P = 0.42, I(2) = 0%; 3 trials; N = 652; high quality evidence). Admission to hospital while receiving home-based end-of-life care varied between trials, and this was reflected by a high level of statistical heterogeneity in this analysis (range RR 0.62 to RR 2.61; 4 trials; N = 823; moderate quality evidence). Home-based end-of-life care may slightly improve patient satisfaction at one-month follow-up and reduce it at six-month follow-up (2 trials; low quality evidence). The effect on caregivers is uncertain (2 trials; low quality evidence). The intervention may slightly reduce healthcare costs (2 trials, low quality evidence). No trial reported costs to patients and caregivers.Authors' conclusionsThe evidence included in this review supports the use of home-based end-of-life care programmes for increasing the number of people who will die at home, although the numbers of people admitted to hospital while receiving end-of-life care should be monitored. Future research should systematically assess the impact of home-based end-of-life care on caregivers.