Dataset Information

Treatment Outcomes Among Pediatric Patients With Highly Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: The Role of New and Repurposed Second-Line Tuberculosis Drugs.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Among pediatric patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), limited data exist regarding treatment outcomes in the context of the new and repurposed second-line TB drugs (SLDs). We aimed to describe the treatment outcomes among pediatric MDR-TB patients receiving new and repurposed SLDs including the proportion who achieved favorable outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) treated for MDR-TB in the country of Georgia from 2009 to 2016. A "new and repurposed" SLD regimen was defined as a regimen that included linezolid, bedaquiline, and/or delamanid. Favorable treatment outcome was defined by treatment completion or documented microbial "cure" status at the end of treatment. We assessed the association between the use of the new and repurposed SLDs with MDR-TB treatment outcomes using bivariate analyses and log-binomial regression.

Results

There were 124 pediatric MDR-TB patients (median age: 13.7; interquartile range: 4.6-16.0) initiating treatment; 119 (96.0%) had a treatment outcome recorded and were included in our analyses. Eighteen (15.1%) patients received new and repurposed SLDs from 2015 or later. After adjusting for potential confounders, the proportion achieving favorable MDR-TB treatment outcomes was higher among patients treated with SLD regimens that included new and/or repurposed drugs when compared with those treated without (adjusted risk ratio: 1.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.51-2.72).

Conclusions

We observed a high proportion of favorable treatment outcomes among pediatric patients with MDR-TB receiving the new and repurposed SLDs. Further studies to evaluate the efficacy and children's tolerability of the new and repurposed SLDs are still warranted.

SUBMITTER: Madzgharashvili T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8087132 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Resistance to second-line drugs develops during treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, but the impact on treatment outcome has not been determined.Patients with MDR tuberculosis starting second-line drug treatment were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Sputum cultures were analyzed at a central reference laboratory. We compared subjects with successful and poor treatment outcomes in terms of (1) initial and acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs (SLIs) and (2) treatment regimens.Of 1244 patients with MDR tuberculosis, 973 (78.2%) had known outcomes and 232 (18.6%) were lost to follow-up. Among those with known outcomes, treatment succeeded in 85.8% with plain MDR tuberculosis, 69.7% with initial resistance to either a fluoroquinolone or an SLI, 37.5% with acquired resistance to a fluoroquinolone or SLI, 29.3% with initial and 13.0% with acquired extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (P < .001 for trend). In contrast, among those with known outcomes, treatment success increased stepwise from 41.6% to 92.3% as the number of drugs proven effective increased from ?1 to ?5 (P < .001 for trend), while acquired drug resistance decreased from 12% to 16% range, depending on the drug, down to 0%-2% (P < .001 for trend). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds of treatment success decreased 0.62-fold (95% confidence interval, .56-.69) for each increment in drug resistance and increased 2.1-fold (1.40-3.18) for each additional effective drug, controlling for differences between programs and patients. Specific treatment, patient, and program variables were also associated with treatment outcome.Increasing drug resistance was associated in a logical stepwise manner with poor treatment outcomes. Acquired resistance was worse than initial resistance to the same drugs. Increasing numbers of effective drugs, specific drugs, and specific program characteristics were associated with better outcomes and less acquired resistance.

Project description:Lopinavir-ritonavir forms the backbone of current first-line antiretroviral regimens in young HIV-infected children. As multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB) frequently occurs in young children in high-burden TB settings, it is important to identify potential interactions between MDR-TB treatment and lopinavir-ritonavir. We describe the pharmacokinetics of and potential drug-drug interactions between lopinavir-ritonavir and drugs routinely used for MDR-TB treatment in HIV-infected children. A combined population pharmacokinetic model was developed to jointly describe the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and ritonavir in 32 HIV-infected children (16 with MDR-TB receiving treatment with combinations of high-dose isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, ethionamide, terizidone, a fluoroquinolone, and amikacin and 16 without TB) who were established on a lopinavir-ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimen. One-compartment models with first-order absorption and elimination for both lopinavir and ritonavir were combined into an integrated model. The dynamic inhibitory effect of the ritonavir concentration on lopinavir clearance was described using a maximum inhibition model. Even after adjustment for the effect of body weight with allometric scaling, a large variability in lopinavir and ritonavir exposure, together with strong correlations between the pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir and ritonavir, was detected. MDR-TB treatment did not have a significant effect on the bioavailability, clearance, or absorption rate constants of lopinavir or ritonavir. Most children (81% of children with MDR-TB, 88% of controls) achieved therapeutic lopinavir trough concentrations (>1 mg/liter). The coadministration of lopinavir-ritonavir with drugs routinely used for the treatment of MDR-TB was found to have no significant effect on the key pharmacokinetic parameters of lopinavir or ritonavir. These findings should be considered in the context of the large interpatient variability found in the present study and the study's modest sample size.