Dataset Information

Different sterilization and disinfection methods used for human tendons - a systematic review using mechanical properties to evaluate tendon allografts.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It is important to know the biomechanical properties of an allograft. This is because when looking to do a transplant of a tendon, the tendon must have very similar biomechanical properties to the original tendon. To use tendon allografts, it is critical to properly sterilize the tendon before implantation. In past decades, several sterilization procedures have been used. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the existing literature to compare the values of failure load/ultimate strength and Young's modulus of elasticity of different sterilization methods on commonly used tendon allografts. Five major scientific literature databases (Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, PLOS ONE, Hindawi) and additional sources were used.

Results

Studies used had to show a particular sterilization method. Studies were identified to meet the following inclusion criteria: is a controlled laboratory study, gamma irradiation (dose reported), and other sterilization methods. Search for publications dated between 1991 and March 31st, 2020. The database search and additional sources resulted in 284 records. Two hundred thirty records eliminated during the screening for various reasons. The number of articles used in the final synthesis was 54.

Conclusions

Identified sterilization methods (gamma irradiation, ethylene oxid, supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2), BioCleanse, Electron Beam) are offered as a catalog of potential methods. As a result of the broadness of the present research, it provides an overview of sterilization methods and their effect on the mechanical properties (failure load and Young's modulus of elasticity) of tendons. It does not stand for the state-of-the-art of any single process. Based on a systematic literature review, we recommend freezing and gamma irradiation or electron beam at 14.8-28.5 kGy. These methods are effective at keeping or improving the mechanical properties, while fully sterilizing the inside and the outside of the tendon. Other sterilization method (ethylene oxide, supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2), BioCleanse) deteriorated the mechanical properties. These methods are not recommended.

SUBMITTER: Farago D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8091719 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMany studies have shown that mucosa-treated tracheas can be used for allotransplantation without the use of immunosuppressants. However, no literature has reported whether the transplanted trachea has normal biomechanics. In this study, fresh dog trachea was used as a control to determine the mechanical properties of allograft trachea after mucous membrane removal.MethodsCervical tracheas (~10 cm in length, consisting of the cartilage rings down to the tracheal carina) and the surrounding connective tissues were removed from 20 mixed-breed dogs and then divided into 4 groups with 5 samples in each group. The groups were defined as follows: group A, fresh canine tracheas without any treatment; group B, canine tracheas after sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) de-epithelialization; group C, canine tracheas implanted into the dorsal fascia of beagle dogs for 1 month after SDS de-epithelialization; group D, canine tracheas implanted into the dorsal fascia of beagle dogs for 6 months after SDS de-epithelialization. All heterotopically implanted beagle dogs were free of any immunosuppressive treatment. Uniaxial tensile (n=20) and compressive (n=20) experiments were performed on the 4 groups of trachea using a universal testing machine; the tensile load was recorded at 150% of the original tracheal length (50% displacement), and the compressive load was recorded at 50% of the initial anteroposterior diameter (50% displacement). The average difference in tensile and compressive loads between groups was compared by analysis of variance.ResultsNo significant difference was found in the mean compressive strength among groups (group A =2.38±0.87 N, group B =3.33±1.03 N, group C =5.39±2.44 N, group D =3.04±2.12 N; P=0.07 for all groups). The mean tensile strength of group C was 9.68±0.86 N, resulting in a significant difference in tensile strength compared to group A (22.51±3.91 N) and B (24.24±7.46 N) (P<0.001). No significant difference in tensile strength was observed among groups A, B, and D.ConclusionsThe de-epithelialized trachea showed no significant change in mechanical properties after 6 months of implantation.

Project description:Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogel scaffolds and GelMA-based bioinks are widely used in tissue engineering and bioprinting due to their ability to support cellular functions and new tissue development. Unfortunately, while terminal sterilization of the GelMA is a critical step for translational tissue engineering applications, it can potentially cause thermal or chemical modifications of GelMA. Thus, understanding the effect of terminal sterilization on GelMA properties is an important, though often overlooked, aspect of material design for translational tissue engineering applications. To this end, we characterized the effects of FDA-approved terminal sterilization methods (autoclaving, ethylene oxide treatment, and gamma (γ)-irradiation) on GelMA prepolymer (bioink) and GelMA hydrogels in terms of the relevant properties for biomedical applications, including mechanical strength, biodegradation rate, cell culture in 2D and 3D, and printability. Autoclaving and ethylene oxide treatment of the GelMA decreased the stiffness of the hydrogel, but the treatments did not modify the biodegradation rate of the hydrogel; meanwhile, γ-irradiation increased the stiffness, reduced the pore size and significantly slowed the biodegradation rate. None of the terminal sterilization methods changed the 2D fibroblast or endothelial cell adhesion and spreading. However, ethylene oxide treatment significantly lowered the fibroblast viability in 3D cell culture. Strikingly, γ-irradiation led to significantly reduced ability of the GelMA prepolymer to undergo sol-gel transition. Furthermore, printability studies showed that the bioinks prepared from γ-irradiated GelMA had significantly reduced printability as compared to the GelMA bioinks prepared from autoclaved or ethylene oxide treated GelMA. These results reveal that the choice of the terminal sterilization method can strongly influence important properties of GelMA bioink and hydrogel. Overall, this study provides further insight into GelMA-based material design with consideration of the effect of terminal sterilization.