Dataset Information

Molecular Characterization of Baseline Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Phase 3 Nosocomial Pneumonia (ASPECT-NP) Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: We reviewed β-lactam-resistant baseline Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lower respiratory tract isolates collected during the ASPECT-NP phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with meropenem for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated adults. Isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, real-time PCR for the quantification of the expression levels of β-lactamase and efflux pump genes, and Western blot analysis for the detection of OprD (P. aeruginosa only). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes were detected in 168 of 262 Enterobacterales isolates, and among these, bla _CTX-M-15 was the most common, detected in 125 isolates. Sixty-one Enterobacterales isolates carried genes encoding carbapenemases, while 33 isolates did not carry ESBLs or carbapenemases. Carbapenemase-producing isolates carried mainly NDM and OXA-48 variants, with ceftolozane-tazobactam MIC values ranging from 4 to 128 µg/ml. Most ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales isolates that did not carry carbapenemases were Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that exhibited disrupted OmpK35, specific mutations in OmpK36, and, in some isolates, elevated expression of bla _CTX-M-15 Among 89 P. aeruginosa isolates, carbapenemases and ESBL-encoding genes were observed in 12 and 22 isolates, respectively. P. aeruginosa isolates without acquired β-lactamases displaying elevated expression of AmpC (14 isolates), elevated expression of efflux pumps (11 isolates), and/or a decrease or loss of OprD (22 isolates) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was active against >75% of the Enterobacterales isolates from the ASPECT-NP trial that did not carry carbapenemases. K. pneumoniae strains resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam might represent a challenge for treatment due to their multiple resistance mechanisms. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was among the agents that displayed the greatest activity against P. aeruginosa isolates. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02070757.).

SUBMITTER: Castanheira M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8092525 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionHospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP and VABP) are associated with significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This a priori, exploratory, secondary analysis from the ASPECT-NP clinical trial evaluated resource utilization among patients with ventilated HABP (vHABP)/VABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam or meropenem.MethodsThis analysis used data from the randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial of patients with vHABP/VABP randomized to receive ceftolozane/tazobactam 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) or meropenem 1 g for 8-14 days. Day 28 outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and time to mechanical ventilation extubation in the microbiological intention-to-treat (mITT) population and in an HCRU population. The HCRU population, a subset of patients from the mITT population that were alive at day 28, was used to remove resource use bias influenced by mortality rates.ResultsCeftolozane/tazobactam-treated versus meropenem-treated patients, respectively, had fewer deaths (20.1% vs. 25.5%), fewer hospital discharges (30.7% vs. 32.4%), and higher ICU discharges (60.0% vs. 58.3%) and extubations (51.9% vs. 48.2%) by day 28. In the HCRU population, adjusted LOS differences (95% confidence intervals) for ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem were 0.1 (- 1.4 to 1.6) hospitalization days, - 1.4 (- 2.9 to 0.2) ICU days, and - 0.9 (- 2.4 to 0.7) mechanical ventilation days. Patterns were similar among the VABP and Pseudomonas aeruginosa subgroups.ConclusionSimilar 28-day resource utilization outcomes were observed between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in the mITT population of patients from ASPECT-NP with vHABP/VABP due to gram-negative pathogens. ASPECT-NP was not powered to detect differences in resource utilization outcomes between treatment groups; however, numerical differences in ICU LOS and duration of mechanical ventilation were noted. Further study is needed to assess resource utilization in the real-world practice setting, especially among patients excluded from ASPECT-NP, including those with resistant P. aeruginosa infections.Trial registrationsClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02070757, registered February 25, 2014; EudraCT: 2012-002862-11.

Project description:Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, commonly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Meropenem is a commonly used therapeutic agent, although emergent resistance occurs during treatment. We used a rabbit HAP infection model to assess the bacterial kill and resistance pharmacodynamics of meropenem. Meropenem 5 mg/kg administered subcutaneously (s.c.) q8h (±amikacin 3.33-5 mg/kg q8h administered intravenously[i.v.]) or meropenem 30 mg/kg s.c. q8h regimens were assessed in a rabbit lung infection model infected with P. aeruginosa, with bacterial quantification and phenotypic/genotypic characterization of emergent resistant isolates. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic output was fitted to a mathematical model, and human-like regimens were simulated to predict outcomes in a clinical context. Increasing meropenem monotherapy demonstrated a dose-response effect to bacterial kill and an inverted U relationship with emergent resistance. The addition of amikacin to meropenem suppressed the emergence of resistance. A network of porin loss, efflux upregulation, and increased expression of AmpC was identified as the mechanism of this emergent resistance. A bridging simulation using human pharmacokinetics identified meropenem 2 g i.v. q8h as the licensed clinical regimen most likely to suppress resistance. We demonstrate an innovative experimental platform to phenotypically and genotypically characterize bacterial emergent resistance pharmacodynamics in HAP. For meropenem, we have demonstrated the risk of resistance emergence during therapy and identified two mitigating strategies: (i) regimen intensification and (ii) use of combination therapy. This platform will allow pre-clinical assessment of emergent resistance risk during treatment of HAP for other antimicrobials, to allow construction of clinical regimens that mitigate this risk.IMPORTANCEThe emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during antimicrobial treatment for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a well-documented problem (particularly in pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa) that contributes to the wider global antimicrobial resistance crisis. During drug development, regimens are typically determined by their sufficiency to achieve bactericidal effect. Prevention of the emergence of resistance pharmacodynamics is usually not characterized or used to determine the regimen. The innovative experimental platform described here allows characterization of the emergence of AMR during the treatment of HAP and the development of strategies to mitigate this. We have demonstrated this specifically for meropenem-a broad-spectrum antibiotic commonly used to treat HAP. We have characterized the antimicrobial resistance pharmacodynamics of meropenem when used to treat HAP, caused by initially meropenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa, phenotypically and genotypically. We have also shown that intensifying the regimen and using combination therapy are both strategies that can both treat HAP and suppress the emergence of resistance.

Project description:BackgroundCeftolozane/tazobactam is approved for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) at double the dose approved for other infection sites. Among nosocomial pneumonia subtypes, ventilated HABP (vHABP) is associated with the lowest survival. In the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled trial, participants with vHABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) than those receiving meropenem. We conducted a series of post hoc analyses to explore the clinical significance of this finding.MethodsASPECT-NP was a multinational, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating vHABP and VABP; study design, efficacy, and safety results have been reported previously. The primary endpoint was 28-day ACM. The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at test-of-cure. Participants with vHABP were a prospectively defined subgroup, but subgroup analyses were not powered for noninferiority testing. We compared baseline and treatment factors, efficacy, and safety between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in participants with vHABP. We also conducted a retrospective multivariable logistic regression analysis in this subgroup to determine the impact of treatment arm on mortality when adjusted for significant prognostic factors.ResultsOverall, 99 participants in the ceftolozane/tazobactam and 108 in the meropenem arm had vHABP. 28-day ACM was 24.2% and 37.0%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference: 0.2, 24.8) and 18.2% and 36.6%, respectively, in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (95% CI 2.5, 32.5). Clinical cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 50.5% and 44.4%, respectively (95% CI - 7.4, 19.3). Baseline clinical, baseline microbiologic, and treatment factors were comparable between treatment arms. Multivariable regression identified concomitant vasopressor use and baseline bacteremia as significantly impacting ACM in ASPECT-NP; adjusting for these two factors, the odds of dying by day 28 were 2.3-fold greater when participants received meropenem instead of ceftolozane/tazobactam.ConclusionsThere were no underlying differences between treatment arms expected to have biased the observed survival advantage with ceftolozane/tazobactam in the vHABP subgroup. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors found to impact ACM significantly in this trial, the mortality risk in participants with vHABP was over twice as high when treated with meropenem compared with ceftolozane/tazobactam.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070757. Registered 25 February, 2014, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02070757.

Project description:Novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations currently approved for clinical use are poorly active against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing strains. We evaluated the in vitro activity of cefepime-taniborbactam (FTB [formerly cefepime-VNRX-5133]) and comparator agents against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (n = 247) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas species (n = 170) clinical isolates prospectively collected from different clinical origins in patients admitted to 8 Spanish hospitals. FTB was the most active agent in both Enterobacterales (97.6% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L) and Pseudomonas (67.1% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L) populations. The MICFTB was >8 mg/L in 6/247 (2.4%) Enterobacterales isolates (3 KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, 1 VIM-producing Enterobacter cloacae isolate, 1 IMP-producing E. cloacae isolate, and 1 NDM-producing Escherichia coli isolate) and in 56/170 (32.9%) Pseudomonas isolates, 19 of them carbapenemase producers (15 producers of VIM, 2 of GES, 1 of GES+VIM, and 1 of GES+KPC). Against the Enterobacterales isolates with meropenem MICs of >2 mg/L (138/247), FTB was the most active agent against both serine-β-lactamases (107/138) and MBL producers (31/138) (97.2 and 93.5% MICFTB, ≤8/4 mg/L, respectively), whereas the activity of comparators was reduced, particularly against the MBL producers (ceftazidime-avibactam, 94.4 and 12.9%, meropenem-vaborbactam, 85.0 and 64.5%, imipenem-relebactam, 76.6 and 9.7%, ceftolozane-tazobactam, 1.9 and 0%, and piperacillin-tazobactam, 0 and 0%, respectively). Among the meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas isolates (163/170; MIC, >2 mg/L), the activities of FTB against serine-β-lactamase (35/163) and MBL (43/163) producers were 88.6 and 65.1%, respectively, whereas the susceptibilities of comparators were as follows: ceftazidime-avibactam, 88.5 and 16.0%, meropenem-vaborbactam, 8.5 and 7.0%, imipenem-relebactam, 2.9 and 2.3%, ceftolozane-tazobactam, 0 and 2.3%, and piperacillin-tazobactam, 0 and 0%, respectively. Microbiological results suggest FTB as a potential therapeutic option in patients infected with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas isolates, including MBL producers.

Dataset Information

Molecular Characterization of Baseline Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Phase 3 Nosocomial Pneumonia (ASPECT-NP) Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets