Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Optimizing the timing of diagnostic testing after positive findings in lung cancer screening: a proof of concept radiomics study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The timeliness of diagnostic testing after positive screening remains suboptimal because of limited evidence and methodology, leading to delayed diagnosis of lung cancer and over-examination. We propose a radiomics approach to assist with planning of the diagnostic testing interval in lung cancer screening.

Methods

From an institute-based lung cancer screening cohort, we retrospectively selected 92 patients with pulmonary nodules with diameters ≥ 3 mm at baseline (61 confirmed as lung cancer by histopathology; 31 confirmed cancer-free). Four groups of region-of-interest-based radiomic features (n = 310) were extracted for quantitative characterization of the nodules, and eight features were proven to be predictive of cancer diagnosis, noise-robust, phenotype-related, and non-redundant. A radiomics biomarker was then built with the random survival forest method. The patients with nodules were divided into low-, middle- and high-risk subgroups by two biomarker cutoffs that optimized time-dependent sensitivity and specificity for decisions about diagnostic workup within 3 months and about repeat screening after 12 months, respectively. A radiomics-based follow-up schedule was then proposed. Its performance was visually assessed with a time-to-diagnosis plot and benchmarked against lung RADS and four other guideline protocols.

Results

The radiomics biomarker had a high time-dependent area under the curve value (95% CI) for predicting lung cancer diagnosis within 12 months; training: 0.928 (0.844, 0.972), test: 0.888 (0.766, 0.975); the performance was robust in extensive cross-validations. The time-to-diagnosis distributions differed significantly between the three patient subgroups, p < 0.001: 96.2% of high-risk patients (n = 26) were diagnosed within 10 months after baseline screen, whereas 95.8% of low-risk patients (n = 24) remained cancer-free by the end of the study. Compared with the five existing protocols, the proposed follow-up schedule performed best at securing timely lung cancer diagnosis (delayed diagnosis rate: < 5%) and at sparing patients with cancer-free nodules from unnecessary repeat screenings and examinations (false recommendation rate: 0%).

Conclusions

Timely management of screening-detected pulmonary nodules can be substantially improved with a radiomics approach. This proof-of-concept study's results should be further validated in large programs.

SUBMITTER: Wang Z 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8094528 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10541220 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5362413 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7979612 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8831270 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9125009 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8591522 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB4408 | ENA
| S-EPMC9775514 | biostudies-literature
2017-05-24 | GSE89972 | GEO
| S-EPMC5480272 | biostudies-literature