Dataset Information

Development and Validation a Nomogram Incorporating CT Radiomics Signatures and Radiological Features for Differentiating Invasive Adenocarcinoma From Adenocarcinoma In Situ and Minimally Invasive Adenocarcinoma Presenting as Ground-Glass Nodules Measuring 5-10mm in Diameter.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To develop and validate a nomogram for differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) presenting as ground-glass nodules (GGNs) measuring 5-10mm in diameter.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 446 patients with 478 GGNs histopathologically confirmed AIS, MIA or IAC. These patients were assigned to a primary cohort, an internal validation cohort and an external validation cohort. The segmentation of these GGNs on thin-slice computed tomography (CT) were performed semi-automatically with in-house software. Radiomics features were then extracted from unenhanced CT images with PyRadiomics. Radiological features of these GGNs were also collected. Radiomics features were investigated for usefulness in building radiomics signatures by spearman correlation analysis, minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature ranking method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and radiological features. The performance of the nomogram was assessed with discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness and evaluated on the validation cohorts.

Results

Five radiomics features remained after features selection. The model incorporating radiomics signatures and four radiological features (bubble-like appearance, tumor-lung interface, mean CT value, average diameter) showed good calibration and good discrimination with AUC of 0.831(95%CI, 0.772~0.890). Application of the nomogram in the internal validation cohort with AUC of 0.792 (95%CI, 0.712~0.871) and in the external validation cohort with AUC of 0.833 (95%CI, 0.729-0.938) also indicated good calibration and good discrimination. The decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

This study presents a nomogram incorporating the radiomics signatures and radiological features, which can be used to predict the risk of IAC in patients with GGNs measuring 5-10mm in diameter individually.

SUBMITTER: Shi L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8096901 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the value of radiomics based on CT imaging in predicting invasive adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs).MethodsThis study enrolled 395 pGGNs with histopathology-confirmed benign nodules or adenocarcinoma. A total of 396 radiomic features were extracted from each labeled nodule. A Rad-score was constructed with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) in the training set. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to establish the radiographic model and the combined radiographic-radiomics model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Based on the multivariate logistic regression analysis, an individual prediction nomogram was developed and the clinical utility was assessed.ResultsFive radiomic features and four radiographic features were selected for predicting the invasive lesions. The combined radiographic-radiomics model (AUC 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86) performed better than the radiographic model (AUC 0.71; 95% CI, 0.62-0.81) and Rad-score (AUC 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.81) in the validation set. The clinical utility of the individualized prediction nomogram developed using the Rad-score, margin, spiculation, and size was confirmed in the validation set. The decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that using a model with Rad-score to predict the invasive lesion would be more beneficial than that without Rad-score and the clinical model.ConclusionsThe proposed radiomics-based nomogram that incorporated the Rad-score, margin, spiculation, and size may be utilized as a noninvasive biomarker for the assessment of invasive prediction in patients with pGGNs.Key points• CT-based radiomics analysis helps invasive prediction manifested as pGGNs. • The combined radiographic-radiomics model may be utilized as a noninvasive biomarker for predicting invasive lesion for pGGNs. • Radiomics-based individual nomogram may serve as a vital decision support tool to identify invasive pGGNs, obviating further workup and blind follow-up.

Project description:BackgroundPure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) with pleural contact (P-pGGNs) comprise not only invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC), but also minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA). Radiomics recognizes complex patterns in imaging data by extracting high-throughput features of intra-tumor heterogeneity in a non-invasive manner. In this study, we sought to develop and validate a radiomics signature to identify IAC and MIA presented as P-pGGNs.MethodsIn total, 100 patients with P-pGGNs (69 training samples and 31 testing samples) were retrospectively enrolled from December 2012 to May 2018. Imaging and clinical findings were also analyzed. In total, 106 radiomics features were extracted from the 3D region of interest (ROI) using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Univariate analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for IAC. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method with 10-fold cross-validation was used to generate predictive features to build a radiomics signature. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the radiomics signature. Decision curve analyses (DCA) were also conducted to evaluate whether the radiomics signature was sufficiently robust for clinical practice.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed significant differences between MIA (N = 47) and IAC (N = 53) groups in terms of patient age, lobulation signs, spiculate margins, tumor size, CT values and relative CT values (all P < 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed, when MIA was identified from IAC, that the critical value of tumor length diameter (TLD) was1.39 cm and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.724 (sensitivity = 0.792, specificity = 0.553). The critical CT value on the largest axial plane (CT-LAP) was - 597.45 HU, and the AUC was 0.666 (sensitivity = 0.698, specificity= 0.638). The radiomics signature consisted of seven features and exhibited a good discriminative performance between IAC and MIA, with an AUC of 0.892 (sensitivity = 0.811, specificity 0.719), and 0.862 (sensitivity = 0.625, specificity = 0.800) in training and testing samples, respectively.ConclusionsOur radiomics signature exhibited good discriminative performance in differentiating IAC from MIA in P-pGGNs, and may offer a crucial reference point for follow-up and selective surgical management.

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop and validate predictive models using clinical parameters, radiomic features and a combination of both for preoperative differentiation of pulmonary nodular mucinous adenocarcinoma (PNMA) from pulmonary tuberculoma (PTB).MethodA total of 124 and 53 patients with PNMA and PTB, respectively, were retrospectively analyzed from January 2017 to November 2022 in The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Ligang et al., A machine learning model based on CT and clinical features to distinguish pulmonary nodular mucinous adenocarcinoma from tuberculoma, 2023). A total of 1037 radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). The patients were randomly divided into a training group and a test group at a ratio of 7:3. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used for radiomic feature selection. Three radiomics prediction models were applied: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). The best performing model was adopted, and the radiomics score (Radscore) was then computed. The clinical model was developed using logistic regression. Finally, a combined model was established based on clinical factors and radiomics features. We externally validated the three models in a group of 68 patients (46 and 22 patients with PNMA and PTB, respectively) from Xing Tai People's Hospital (30 and 14 patients with PNMA and PTB, respectively) and The First Hospital of Xing Tai (16 and 8 patients with PNMA and PTB, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) value and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive value of the developed models.ResultsThe combined model established by the logistic regression method had the best performance. The ROC-AUC (also a decision curve analysis) of the combined model was 0.940, 0.990 and 0.960 in the training group, test group and external validation group, respectively, and the combined model showed good predictive performance for the differentiation of PNMA from PTB. The Brier scores of the combined model were 0.132 and 0.068 in the training group and test group, respectively.ConclusionThe combined model incorporating radiomics features and clinical parameters may have potential value for the preoperative differentiation of PNMA from PTB.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with consistent lung pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) have a high incidence of lung adenocarcinoma that can be classified as adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). Regular follow-up is recommended for AIS and MIA, while surgical resection should be considered for IAC. This study sought to develop a multi-parameter prediction model to increase the diagnostic accuracy in discriminating between IAC and AIS or MIA.MethodsThe training data set comprised consecutive patients with lung pGGNs who underwent resection from January to December 2017 at the Zhongshan Hospital. Of the 370 resected pGGNs, 344 were pathologically confirmed to be AIS, MIA, or IAC and were included in the study. The 26 benign pGGNs were excluded. We compared differences in the clinical features (e.g., age and gender), the content of serum tumor biomarkers, the computed tomography (CT) parameters (e.g., nodule size and the maximal CT value), and the morphologic characteristics of nodules (e.g., lobulation, spiculation, pleura indentation, vacuole sign, and normal vessel penetration or abnormal vessel) between the pathological subtypes of AIS, MIA, and IAC. An abnormal vessel was defined as "vessel curve" or "vessel enlargement". Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and rank test. The IAC prediction model was constructed via a multivariate logistical regression. Our prediction model for lung pGGNs was further validated in a data set comprising consecutive patients from multiple medical centers in China from July to December 2018. In total, 345 resected pGGNs were pathologically diagnosed as lung adenocarcinoma in the validation data set.ResultsIn the training data set, patients with pGGNs ≥10 mm in size had a high incidence (74.5%) of IAC. The maximal CT value of IAC [-416.1±121.2 Hounsfield unit (HU)] was much higher than that of MIA (-507.7±138.0 HU) and AIS (-602.6±93.3 HU) (P<0.001). IAC was more common in pGGNs that displayed any of the following CT manifestations: lobulation, spiculation, pleura indentation, vacuole sign, and vessel abnormality. The IAC prediction model was constructed using the parameters that were assessed as risk factors (i.e., the nodule size, maximal CT value, and CT signs). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of this model for diagnosing IAC was 0.910, which was higher than that of the AUC for nodule size alone (0.891) or the AUC for the maximal CT value alone (0.807) (P<0.05, respectively). A multicenter validation data set was used to validate the performance of our prediction model in diagnosing IAC, and our model was found to have an AUC of 0.883, which was higher than that of the AUC of 0.827 for the module size alone model or the AUC of 0.791 for the maximal CT value alone model (P<0.05, respectively).ConclusionsOur multi-parameter prediction model was more accurate at diagnosing IAC than models that used only nodule size or the maximal CT value alone. Thus, it is an efficient tool for identifying the IAC of malignant pGGNs and deciding if surgery is needed.