Dataset Information

Cost-Effectiveness of Management Algorithms for Lung-RADS Category 4 Nodules.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To evaluate nodule management guidelines in a simulated cohort of Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 4 nodules based on real-world data.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, 100 000 patients were simulated from 151 patients with Lung-RADS 4 nodules (from January 2010 to August 2018). Each patient in the simulation was managed with each algorithm, and health outcomes were accumulated based on interventions and delays to cancer diagnosis. If the algorithm missed a cancer, it was diagnosed at the next annual screening round, although it would grow in the interim. Patient age-specific or cancer-specific mortality was assigned depending on whether the nodule was malignant, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. Costs of interventions and cancer treatment were accumulated. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results

The most effective algorithm was the British Thoracic Society (BTS; 10.041 QALYs), followed by the American College of Chest Physicians (10.035 QALYs) and Lung-RADS (10.021 QALYs). Only the BTS and Lung-RADS were on the efficient frontier, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $52 634 (95% CI: $45 122, $60 619). Under nearly all sensitivity analyses, the only algorithms on the efficient frontier were BTS and Lung-RADS. The ICERs for BTS versus Lung-RADS were under $100 000 for all scenarios except an increased life expectancy in patients without cancer, in which case the ICER was $109 273.

Conclusion

The BTS algorithm and Lung-RADS were cost-effective for managing category 4 nodules, with BTS yielding greater QALYs.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021See also the commentary by Elicker in this issue.

SUBMITTER: Hammer MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8098088 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Classification of lung cancer screening CT scans depends on measurement of lung nodule size. Information about interobserver agreement is limited. Purpose To assess interobserver agreement in the measurements and American College of Radiology Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) classifications of solid lung nodules detected at lung cancer screening using manual measurements of average diameter and computer-aided semiautomated measurements of average diameter and volume (CT volumetry). Materials and Methods Two radiologists and one radiology resident retrospectively measured lung nodules from screening CT scans obtained between September 2016 and June 2018 with a Lung-RADS (version 1.0) classification of 2, 3, 4A, or 4B in the clinical setting. Average manual diameter and semiautomated computer-aided diameter and volume measurements were converted to the corresponding Lung-RADS categories. Interobserver agreement in raw measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman indexes, and interobserver agreement in Lung-RADS classification was assessed using bi-rater κ. Results One hundred twenty patients (mean age, 63 years ± 6 [standard deviation]; 67 women) were evaluated. All manual, semiautomated diameter, and semiautomated volume measurements were obtained by all three readers in 120 of 147 nodules (82%). Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.95 for all reader pairs using all measurement methods and were highest using volumetry. Bias and 95% limits of agreement for average diameter were smaller with semiautomated measurements than with manual measurements. κ values across all Lung-RADS classifications were greater than or equal to 0.81, with the lowest being for manual measurements and the highest being for volumetric measurements. Forty-three of 120 (36%) of the nodules were classified into a lower Lung-RADS category on the basis of volumetry compared with using manual diameter measurements by at least one reader, whereas the reverse occurred for four of 120 (3%) of the nodules. Conclusion Interobserver agreement was high with manual diameter measurements and increased with semiautomated CT volumetric measurements. Semiautomated CT volumetry enabled classification of more nodules into lower Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categories than manual or semiautomated diameter measurements. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Nishino in this issue.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis and risk stratification of ACR TI-RADS category 4 and 5 thyroid nodules with non-hypovascular.MethodsFrom January 2016 to December 2019 in our hospital, 217 ACR TI-RADS category 4 and 5 nodules with non-hypovascular in 210 consecutive patients were included for a derivation cohort. With surgery and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as a reference, conventional ultrasound (US) features and CEUS features were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent risk factors and establish a risk predictive model. Between January 2020 and March 2021, a second cohort of 100 consecutive patients with 101 nodules were included for an external validation cohort. The model was converted into a simplified risk score and was validated in the validation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to assess the models' diagnostic performance.ResultsMicro-calcification, irregular margin, earlier wash-out, centripetal enhancement, and absence of ring enhancement were independent risk factors and strongly discriminated malignancy in the derivation cohort (AUC = 0.921, 95% CI 0.876-0.953) and the validation cohort (0.900, 0.824-0.951). There was no significant difference (P = 0.3282) between the conventional US and CEUS in differentiating malignant non-hypovascular thyroid nodules, but a combination of them (the predictive model) had better performance than the single method (all P <0.05), with a sensitivity of 87.0%, specificity of 86.2%, and accuracy of 86.6% in the derivation cohort. The risk score based on the independent risk factors divided non-hypovascular thyroid nodules into low-suspicious (0-3 points; malignancy risk <50%) and high-suspicious (4-7 points; malignancy risk ≥ 50%), the latter with nodule ≥10mm was recommended for FNA. The risk score showed a good ability of risk stratification in the validation cohort. Comparing ACR TI-RADS in screening suitable non-hypovascular nodules for FNA, the risk score could avoid 30.8% benign nodules for FNA.ConclusionsCEUS is helpful in combination with conventional US in differentiating ACR TI-RADS category 4 and 5 nodules with non-hypovascular. The risk score in this study has the potential to improve the diagnosis and risk stratification of non-hypovascular thyroid nodules.

Project description:RATIONALE:Lung computed tomography (CT) Screening Reporting and Data System (lung-RADS) has standardized follow-up and management decisions in lung cancer screening. To date, little is known how lung-RADS classification compares with radiological semantic features in risk prediction and diagnostic discrimination. OBJECTIVES:To compare the performance of radiological semantic features and lung-RADS in predicting nodule malignancy in lung cancer screening. METHODS:We used data and low-dose CT (LDCT) images from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). The training cohort contained 60 patients with screen-detected incident lung cancers who had a positive baseline screen (T0) that was not diagnosed and then was diagnosed at second follow-up (T2), and 139 nodule-positive controls who had 3 consecutive positive screens (T0 to T2) that were not diagnosed as lung cancer. The testing cohort included 40 patients with incident lung cancers that were diagnosed at first follow-up (T1) and 40 nodule-positive controls. Twenty-four semantic features were scored on a point scale from the LDCT images. Multivariable linear predictor model was built on the semantic features and the performances were compared with lung-RADS in 3 screening rounds. We also combined non-size-based semantic features with lung-RADS to improve malignancy detection. RESULTS:At T0, the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for border definition in risk prediction was 0.72. The average AUROC for contour at T1 in risk prediction and T2 in diagnostic discrimination was 0.82 and 0.88, respectively. By comparison, the average AUROC of lung-RADS at T0, T1 and T2 were 0.60, 0.76 and 0.87, respectively. The combined model of the semantic features and lung-RADS shows improvement with AUROCs of 0.74, 0.88 and 0.96 at T0, T1, and T2, respectively, achieved by adding border definition (at T0) or contour (at T1 and T2). CONCLUSION:We find semantic features defined by border definition and contour performed similar to lung-RADS at follow-up time point and outperformed lung-RADS at baseline. These semantics alongside of lung-RADS shows improved performance to detect malignancy.

Project description:Patients who have incidentally detected pulmonary nodules and an estimated intermediate risk (5-60%) of lung cancer frequently are followed via computed tomography (CT) surveillance to detect nodule growth, despite guidelines for a more aggressive diagnostic strategy. We examined the cost-effectiveness of an autoantibody test (AABT)-Early Cancer Detection Test-Lung (EarlyCDT-LungTM)-as an aid to early diagnosis of lung cancer among such patients.We developed a decision-analytic model to evaluate use of the AABT versus CT surveillance alone. In the model, patients with a positive AABT-because they are at substantially enhanced risk of lung cancer-are assumed to go directly to biopsy, resulting in diagnosis of lung cancer in earlier stages than under current guidelines (a beneficial stage shift). Patients with a negative AABT, and those scheduled for CT surveillance alone, are assumed to have periodic CT screenings to detect rapid growth and thus to have their lung cancers diagnosed-on average-at more advanced stages.Among 1,000 patients who have incidentally detected nodules 8-30 mm, have an intermediate-risk of lung cancer, and are evaluated by CT surveillance alone, 95 (9.5%) are assumed to have lung cancer (local, 73.6%; regional, 22.0%; distant, 4.4%). With use of the AABT set at a sensitivity/specificity of 41%/93% (stage shift = 10.8%), although expected costs would be higher by $949,442 ($949 per person), life years would be higher by 53 (0.05 per person), resulting in a cost per life-year gained of $18,029 and a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of $24,330. With use of the AABT set at a sensitivity/specificity of 28%/98% (stage shift = 7.4%), corresponding cost-effectiveness ratios would be $18,454 and $24,833.Under our base-case assumptions, and reasonable variations thereof, using AABT as an aid in the early diagnosis of lung cancer in patients with incidentally detected pulmonary nodules who are estimated to be at intermediate risk of lung cancer and are scheduled for CT surveillance alone is likely to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources.

Project description:Importance:Among high-risk patients with hypertension, targeting a systolic blood pressure of 120 mm Hg reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with a higher target. However, intensive blood pressure management incurs additional costs from treatment and from adverse events. Objective:To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of intensive blood pressure management compared with standard management. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cost-effectiveness analysis conducted from September 2015 to August 2016 used a Markov cohort model to estimate cost-effectiveness of intensive blood pressure management among 68-year-old high-risk adults with hypertension but not diabetes. We used the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) to estimate treatment effects and adverse event rates. We used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Life Tables to project age- and cause-specific mortality, calibrated to rates reported in SPRINT. We also used population-based observational data to model development of heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and subsequent mortality. Costs were based on published sources, Medicare data, and the National Inpatient Sample. Interventions:Treatment of hypertension to a systolic blood pressure goal of 120 mm Hg (intensive management) or 140 mm Hg (standard management). Main Outcomes and Measures:Lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), discounted at 3% annually. Results:Standard management yielded 9.6 QALYs and accrued $155?261 in lifetime costs, while intensive management yielded 10.5 QALYs and accrued $176?584 in costs. Intensive blood pressure management cost $23?777 per QALY gained. In a sensitivity analysis, serious adverse events would need to occur at 3 times the rate observed in SPRINT and be 3 times more common in the intensive management arm to prefer standard management. Conclusions and Relevance:Intensive blood pressure management is cost-effective at typical thresholds for value in health care and remains so even with substantially higher adverse event rates.

Project description:Purpose To evaluate Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 assessment at diagnostic examination after recall from screening in a large urban population after implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) by focusing both on overall use and use stratified by recalled finding type and outcome at 2 years. Materials and Methods This was an intuitional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant retrospective review of 10 728 digital mammography (DM) examinations from September 1, 2010, to August 30, 2011, and 15 571 screening DBT examinations from October 1, 2011, to February 28, 2013. The recall populations for DM and DBT were 1112 of 10 728 (10.4% of women screened) and 1366 of 15 571 (8.8% of women screened), respectively. Recall examinations were classified according to finding type: calcifications, asymmetry or focal asymmetry, mass, and architectural distortion. Differences between groups were compared by using the ?2 test. Results Although there was no significant change in the utilization rate of BI-RADS category 3 in those patients screened with DM compared with DBT (168 of 10 728, 1.6% for DM vs 206 of 15 571, 1.3% for DBT; P = .102), there was a mean overall reduction of 2.4 women per 1000 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.5, 5.4) recommended for short-term follow-up. Lesion types given a BI-RADS category 3 assessment after diagnostic work-up did not change. The distribution of recalled finding types significantly changed with DBT, with increased recall examinations for architectural distortion and mass (P < .001) and decreased recall examinations for asymmetries (P ? .001). There was no change in recall examinations for calcifications (P = .977). Conclusion Screening with DBT did not significantly change the utilization rate of BI-RADS category 3 classification; however, the overall number of patients recommended for short-interval follow-up decreased by a mean of 2.4 women per 1000 (95% CI: -0.5, 5.4). © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:ObjectivesHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in cirrhosis if the characteristic pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement followed by hypoenhancement is present. Recent studies suggest that diagnosis based on this "hyper-hypo" pattern needs further refinement. This study compares the diagnostic accuracies of standardized CEUS for HCC according to the current guideline definition and following the newly developed CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®, ESCULAP) in a prospective multicenter real-life setting.MethodsCirrhotic patients with liver lesions on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively from 04/2018 to 04/2019, and clinical and imaging data were collected. The CEUS standard included an additional examination point after 4-6 min in case of no washout after 3 min. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS following the guidelines ("hyper-hypo" pattern), based on the examiner's subjective interpretation ("CEUS subjective"), and based on the CEUS algorithms ESCULAP and CEUS LI-RADS® were compared.ResultsIn total, 470 cirrhotic patients were recruited in 43 centers. The final diagnosis was HCC in 378 cases (80.4%) according to the reference standard (histology 77.4%, MRI 16.4%, CT 6.2%). The "hyper-hypo" pattern yielded 74.3% sensitivity and 63% specificity. "CEUS subjective" showed a higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, 91.5%; specificity, 67.4%; positive predictive value, 92%; negative predictive value, 66%). Sensitivity was higher for ESCULAP (95%) and "CEUS subjective" (91.5%) versus CEUS LI-RADS® (65.2%; p < 0.001). Specificity was highest for CEUS LI-RADS® (78.6%; p < 0.001).ConclusionsCEUS has an excellent diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC in cirrhosis. CEUS algorithms may be a helpful refinement of the "hyper-hypo" pattern defined by current HCC guidelines.Key points• Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. • The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) showed the highest sensitivity, whereas the CEUS LI-RADS® (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) algorithm yielded the highest specificity. • A standardized CEUS examination procedure with an additional examination point in the late phase, after 4-6 min in lesions with no washout after 3 min, is vital.