Dataset Information

Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To evaluate the reproducibility and predicted clinical outcomes of CT-based quantitative lung density measurements using standard fixed-dose (FD) and reduced-dose (RD) scans.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data, 1205 participants (mean age, 65 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 618 men) enrolled in the COPDGene study who underwent FD and RD CT image acquisition protocols between November 2014 and July 2017 were included. Of these, the RD scans of 640 participants were also reconstructed using iterative reconstruction (IR). Median filtering was applied to the RD scans (RD-MF) to investigate an alternative noise reduction strategy. CT attenuation at the 15th percentile of the lung CT histogram (Perc15) was computed for all image types (FD, RD, RD-MF, and RD-IR). Reproducibility coefficients were calculated to quantify the measurement differences between FD and RD scans. The ability of Perc15 to predict chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis and exacerbation frequency was investigated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results

The Perc15 reproducibility coefficients with and without volume adjustment were as follows: RD, 29.43 HU ± 0.62 versus 32.81 HU ± 1.70; RD-MF, 7.42 HU ± 0.42 versus 19.40 HU ± 2.65; and RD-IR, 7.10 HU ± 0.52 versus 22.46 HU ± 3.91. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that Perc15 on volume-adjusted FD and RD scans were both predictive for COPD diagnosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: FD, 0.724 ± 0.045; RD, 0.739 ± 0.045) and for having one or more exacerbation per year (AUCs: FD, 0.593 ± 0.068; RD, 0.589 ± 0.066). Similar trends were observed when volume adjustment was not applied.

Conclusion

A combination of volume adjustment and noise reduction filtering improved the reproducibility of lung density measurements computed using serial FD and RD CT scans.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021.

SUBMITTER: Hatt CR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8098098 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.

Hatt Charles R CR Oh Andrea S AS Obuchowski Nancy A NA Charbonnier Jean-Paul JP Lynch David A DA Humphries Stephen M SM

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging 20210422 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>To evaluate the reproducibility and predicted clinical outcomes of CT-based quantitative lung density measurements using standard fixed-dose (FD) and reduced-dose (RD) scans.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In this retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data, 1205 participants (mean age, 65 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 618 men) enrolled in the COPDGene study who underwent FD and RD CT image acquisition protocols between November 2014 and July 2017 were included. Of thes ...[more]

PMID: 33969308

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFrequent chest CTs within a short period during follow-up of long COVID patients may increase the risk of radiation-related health effects in the exposed individuals. We aimed to assess the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) chest compared to standard-dose CT (SDCT) in detecting lung abnormalities associated with long COVID.MethodsIn this prospective study, 100 long COVID patients with respiratory dysfunction underwent SDCT and ULDCT chest that were compared in terms of objective (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR) and subjective image quality (image graininess, sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic accuracy along with the European guidelines on image quality criteria for CT chest), detection of imaging patterns of long COVID, CT severity score, and effective radiation dose. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of ULDCT was compared among obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI<30 kg/m2) subjects.ResultsThe mean age of study participants was 53 ± 12.9 years, and 68% were male. The mean SNR was 31.4 ± 5.5 and 11.3 ± 4.6 for SDCT and ULDCT respectively (p< 0.0001). Common findings seen on SDCT included ground-glass opacities (GGOs, 77%), septal thickening/reticulations (67%), atelectatic/parenchymal bands (63%) and nodules (26%). ULDCT provided sharp images, with no/minimal graininess, and high diagnostic confidence in 81%, 82% and 80% of the cases respectively. The sensitivity of ULDCT for various patterns of long COVID was 72.7% (GGOs), 71.6% (interlobular septal thickening/reticulations), 100% (consolidation), 81% (atelectatic/parenchymal bands) and 76.9% (nodules). ULDCT scans in non-obese subjects exhibited a significantly higher sensitivity (88% vs. 60.3%, p < 0.0001) and diagnostic accuracy (97.7% vs. 84.9%, p < 0.0001) compared to obese subjects. ULDCT showed very strong correlation with SDCT in terms of CT severity score (r = 0.996, p < 0.0001). The mean effective radiation dose with ULDCT was 0.25 ± 0.02 mSv with net radiation dose reduction of 94.8% ± 1.7% (p < 0.0001) when compared to SDCT (5.5 ± 1.96 mSv).ConclusionULDCT scans achieved comparable diagnostic accuracy to SDCT for detecting long COVID lung abnormalities in non-obese patients, while significantly reducing radiation exposure.

Project description:ObjectivesTo quantitatively evaluate the impact of virtual monochromatic images (VMI) on reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in terms of coronary lumen segmentation in vitro, and secondly to assess the image quality in vivo, compared with conventional CT obtained with regular iodine dose.Materials and methodsA phantom simulating regular and reduced iodine injection was used to determine the accuracy and precision of lumen area segmentation for various VMI energy levels. We retrospectively included 203 patients from December 2017 to August 2018 (mean age, 51.7 ± 16.8 years) who underwent CCTA using either standard (group A, n = 103) or reduced (group B, n = 100) iodine doses. Conventional images (group A) were qualitatively and quantitatively compared with 55-keV VMI (group B). We recorded the location of venous catheters.ResultsIn vitro, VMI outperformed conventional CT, with a segmentation accuracy of 0.998 vs. 1.684 mm2, respectively (p < 0.001), and a precision of 0.982 vs. 1.229 mm2, respectively (p < 0.001), in simulated overweight adult subjects. In vivo, the rate of diagnostic CCTA in groups A and B was 88.4% (n = 91/103) vs. 89% (n = 89/100), respectively, and noninferiority of protocol B was inferred. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of lumen versus fat and muscle were higher in group B (p < 0.001) and comparable for lumen versus calcium (p = 0.423). Venous catheters were more often placed on the forearm or hand in group B (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn vitro, low-keV VMI improve vessel area segmentation. In vivo, low-keV VMI allows for a 40% iodine dose and injection rate reduction while maintaining diagnostic image quality and improves the CNR between lumen versus fat and muscle.Key points• Dual-energy coronary CT angiography is becoming increasingly available and might help improve patient management. • Compared with regular-iodine-dose coronary CT angiography, reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy CT with low-keV monochromatic image reconstructions performed better in phantom-based vessel cross-sectional segmentation and proved to be noninferior in vivo. • Patients receiving reduced-iodine-dose dual-energy coronary CT angiography often had the venous catheter placed on the forearm or wrist without compromising image quality.

Project description:Purpose To compare the image quality and diagnostic capability in detecting malignant liver tumors of low-dose CT (LDCT, 33% dose) with deep learning-based denoising (DLD) and standard-dose CT (SDCT, 100% dose) with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Materials and Methods In this prospective, multicenter, noninferiority study, individuals referred for liver CT scans were enrolled from three tertiary referral hospitals between February 2021 and August 2022. All liver CT scans were conducted using a dual-source scanner with the dose split into tubes A (67% dose) and B (33% dose). Blended images from tubes A and B were created using MBIR to produce SDCT images, whereas LDCT images used data from tube B and were reconstructed with DLD. The noise in liver images was measured and compared between imaging techniques. The diagnostic performance of each technique in detecting malignant liver tumors was evaluated by three independent radiologists using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis. Noninferiority of LDCT compared with SDCT was declared when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in figure of merit (FOM) was greater than -0.10. Results A total of 296 participants (196 men, 100 women; mean age, 60.5 years ± 13.3 [SD]) were included. The mean noise level in the liver was significantly lower for LDCT (10.1) compared with SDCT (10.7) (P < .001). Diagnostic performance was assessed in 246 participants (108 malignant tumors in 90 participants). The reader-averaged FOM was 0.880 for SDCT and 0.875 for LDCT (P = .35). The difference fell within the noninferiority margin (difference, -0.005 [95% CI: -0.024, 0.012]). Conclusion Compared with SDCT with MBIR, LDCT using 33% of the standard radiation dose had reduced image noise and comparable diagnostic performance in detecting malignant liver tumors. Keywords: CT, Abdomen/GI, Liver, Comparative Studies, Diagnosis, Reconstruction Algorithms Clinical trial registration no. NCT05804799 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop radiomic models based on low-dose CT (LDCT) and standard-dose CT to distinguish adenocarcinomas from benign lesions in patients with solid solitary pulmonary nodules and compare the performance among these radiomic models and Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). The reproducibility of radiomic features between LDCT and standard-dose CT were also evaluated.MethodsA total of 141 consecutive pathologically confirmed solid solitary pulmonary nodules were enrolled including 50 adenocarcinomas and 48 benign nodules in primary cohort and 22 adenocarcinomas and 21 benign nodules in validation cohort. LDCT and standard-dose CT scans were conducted using same acquisition parameters and reconstruction method except for radiation dose. All nodules were automatically segmented and 104 original radiomic features were extracted. The concordance correlation coefficient was used to quantify reproducibility of radiomic features between LDCT and standard-dose CT. Radiomic features were selected to build radiomic signature, and clinical characteristics and radiomic signature were combined to develop radiomic nomogram for LDCT and standard-dose CT, respectively. The performance of radiomic models and Lung-RADS was assessed by area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity.ResultsShape and first order features, and neighboring gray tone difference matrix features were highly reproducible between LDCT and standard-dose CT. No significant differences of AUCs were found among radiomic signature and nomogram of LDCT and standard-dose CT in both primary and validation cohort (0.915 vs. 0.919 vs. 0.898 vs. 0.909 and 0.976 vs. 0.976 vs. 0.985 vs. 0.987, respectively). These radiomic models had higher specificity than Lung-RADS (all correct P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences of sensitivity between Lung-RADS and radiomic models.ConclusionsThe diagnostic performance of LDCT-based radiomic models to differentiate adenocarcinomas from benign lesions in solid pulmonary nodules were equivalent to that of standard-dose CT. The LDCT-based radiomic model with higher specificity and lower false-positive rate than Lung-RADS might help reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment of solid pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening.

Dataset Information

Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets