Neurological diseases and COVID-19: prospective analyses using the UK Biobank.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Veronese N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8098789 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:In December 2019, a coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), began infecting humans, causing a novel disease, coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19). This was first described in the Wuhan province of the People's Republic of China. SARS-CoV-2 has spread throughout the world, causing a global pandemic. To date, thousands of cases of COVID-19 have been reported in the United Kingdom, and over 45,000 patients have died. Some progress has been achieved in managing this disease, but the biological determinants of health, in addition to age, that affect SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and mortality are under scrutiny. Recent studies show that several medical conditions, including diabetes and hypertension, increase the risk of COVID-19 and death. The increased vulnerability of elderly individuals and those with comorbidities, together with the prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases with advanced age, led us to investigate the links between neurodegeneration and COVID-19. We analysed the primary health records of 13,338 UK individuals tested for COVID-19 between March and July 2020. We show that a pre-existing diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease predicts the highest risk of COVID-19 and mortality among elderly individuals. In contrast, Parkinson's disease patients were found to have a higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection but not mortality from COVID-19. We conclude that there are disease-specific differences in COVID-19 susceptibility among patients affected by neurodegenerative disorders.
| S-EPMC7839041 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCertain viral infections have been linked to the development of neurodegenerative diseases. This study aimed to investigate the association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and five neurodegenerative diseases, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and related syndromes, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and disorders of the autonomic nervous system (DANS).MethodsThis prospective cohort included white British individuals who underwent CMV testing in the UK Biobank from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2021. A Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to estimate the future risk of developing five neurodegenerative diseases in individuals with or without CMV infection, adjusted for batch effect, age, sex, and Townsend deprivation index in Model 1, and additionally for type 2 diabetes, cancer, osteoporosis, vitamin D, monocyte count and leukocyte count in Model 2. Bidirectional Mendelian randomization was employed to validate the potential causal relationship between CMV infection and PD.FindingsA total of 8346 individuals, consisting of 4620 females (55.4%) and 3726 males (44.6%) who were white British at an average age of 56.74 (8.11), were included in this study. The results showed that CMV infection did not affect the risk of developing AD (model 1: HR [95% CI] = 1.01 [0.57, 1.81], P = 0.965; model 2: HR = 1.00 [0.56, 1.79], P = 0.999), SMA and related syndromes (model 1: HR = 3.57 [0.64, 19.80], P = 0.146; model 2: HR = 3.52 [0.63, 19.61], P = 0.152), MS (model 1: HR = 1.16 [0.45, 2.97], P = 0.756; model 2: HR = 1.16 [0.45, 2.97], P = 0.761) and DANS (model 1: HR = 0.65 [0.16, 2.66], P = 0.552; model 2: HR = 0.65 [0.16, 2.64], P = 0.543). Interestingly, it was found that participants who were CMV seronegative had a higher risk of developing PD compared to those who were seropositive (model 1: HR = 2.37 [1.25, 4.51], P = 0.009; model 2: HR = 2.39 [1.25, 4.54], P = 0.008) after excluding deceased individuals. This association was notably stronger in males (model 1: HR = 3.16 [1.42, 7.07], P = 0.005; model 2: HR = 3.41 [1.50, 7.71], P = 0.003), but no significant difference was observed in the female subgroup (model 1: HR = 1.28 [0.40, 4.07], P = 0.679; model 2: HR = 1.27 [0.40, 4.06], P = 0.684). However, a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis did not find a genetic association between CMV infection and PD.InterpretationThe study found that males who did not have a CMV infection were at a higher risk of developing PD. The findings provided a new viewpoint on the risk factors for PD and may potentially influence public health approaches for the disease.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (81873776), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2021A1515011681, 2023A1515010495).
| S-EPMC11327475 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLiver disease is linked to series of extrahepatic multisystem manifestations. However, little is known about the associations between liver and eye diseases, especially cataract, the global leading cause of blindness. We aimed to investigate whether severe liver diseases, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), viral hepatitis, and liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, were associated with an increased risk of the cataract.MethodsA total of 326,558 participants without cataract at baseline enrolled in the UK Biobank between 2006 and 2010 were included in this prospective study. The exposures of interest were severe liver diseases (defined as hospital admission), including NAFLD, ALD, viral hepatitis and liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. The outcome was incident cataract. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each liver disease was first treated as a binary time-varying variable to investigate its association with cataract, and then was treated as a ternary time-varying variable to examine the recent (liver disease within 0-5 years) vs. long-term (liver disease > 5 years) state associations with the risk of cataract.FindingsAfter a median follow-up of 13.3 years (interquartile range, 12.5-14.0 years), 37,064 individuals were documented as developing cataract. Higher risk of cataract was found in those with severe NAFLD (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61), ALD (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.28-1.94) and liver fibrosis and cirrhosis (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.35-1.85), but not in individuals with viral hepatitis when exposure was treated as a binary time-varying variable (P = 0.13). When treating exposure as a ternary time-varying variable, an association between recently diagnosed viral hepatitis and cataract was also observed (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.07-2.23). Results from the combined model suggested they were independent risk factors for incident cataract. No substantial changes were found in further sensitivity analyses.InterpretationSevere liver diseases, including NAFLD, ALD, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and recently diagnosed viral hepatitis, were associated with cataract. The revelation of liver-eye connection suggests the importance of ophthalmic care in the management of liver disease, and the intervention precedence of patients with liver disease in the early screening and diagnosis of cataract.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission, Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty Program, the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program.
| S-EPMC10831806 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFrailty and multimorbidity have been suggested as risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease.AimsWe investigated, in the UK Biobank, whether frailty and multimorbidity were associated with risk of hospitalisation with COVID-19.Methods502,640 participants aged 40-69 years at baseline (54-79 years at COVID-19 testing) were recruited across UK during 2006-10. A modified assessment of frailty using Fried's classification was generated from baseline data. COVID-19 test results (England) were available for 16/03/2020-01/06/2020, mostly taken in hospital settings. Logistic regression was used to discern associations between frailty, multimorbidity and COVID-19 diagnoses, after adjusting for sex, age, BMI, ethnicity, education, smoking and number of comorbidity groupings, comparing COVID-19 positive, COVID-19 negative and non-tested groups.Results4510 participants were tested for COVID-19 (positive = 1326, negative = 3184). 497,996 participants were not tested. Compared to the non-tested group, after adjustment, COVID-19 positive participants were more likely to be frail (OR = 1.4 [95%CI = 1.1, 1.8]), report slow walking speed (OR = 1.3 [1.1, 1.6]), report two or more falls in the past year (OR = 1.3 [1.0, 1.5]) and be multimorbid (≥ 4 comorbidity groupings vs 0-1: OR = 1.9 [1.5, 2.3]). However, similar strength of associations were apparent when comparing COVID-19 negative and non-tested groups. However, frailty and multimorbidity were not associated with COVID-19 diagnoses, when comparing COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative participants.Discussion and conclusionsFrailty and multimorbidity do not appear to aid risk stratification, in terms of positive versus negative results of COVID-19 testing. Investigation of the prognostic value of these markers for adverse clinical sequelae following COVID-19 disease is urgently needed.
| S-EPMC7377312 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAn increased susceptibility to COVID-19 has been suggested for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases, but data are scarce from longitudinal studies.MethodsIn this community-based cohort study, we included 96,275 participants of the UK Biobank who had available SARS-CoV-2 test results in Public Health England. Of these, 2617 had a clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases in the UK Biobank inpatient hospital data before the outbreak of COVID-19 (defined as January 31st, 2020), while the remaining participants constituted the reference group. We then followed both groups from January 31st, 2020 to June 14th, 2021 for ascertainment of COVID-19 outcomes, including any COVID-19, inpatient care for COVID-19, and COVID-19 related death. Logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between neurogenerative disease and risks of COVID-19 outcomes, adjusted for multiple confounders and somatic comorbidities.ResultsWe observed an elevated risk of COVID-19 outcomes among individuals with a neurodegenerative disease compared with the reference group, corresponding to a fully adjusted odds ratio of 2.47 (95%CI 2.25-2.71) for any COVID-19, 2.18 (95%CI 1.94-2.45) for inpatient COVID-19, and 3.67 (95%CI 3.11-4.34) for COVID-19 related death. Among individuals with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2, individuals with neurodegenerative diseases had also a higher risk of COVID-19 related death than others (fully adjusted odds ratio 2.08; 95%CI 1.71-2.53).ConclusionAmong UK Biobank participants who received at least one test for SARS-CoV-2, a pre-existing diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease was associated with a subsequently increased risk of COVID-19, especially COVID-19 related death.
| S-EPMC8739517 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate severe COVID-19 risk by occupational group.MethodsBaseline UK Biobank data (2006-10) for England were linked to SARS-CoV-2 test results from Public Health England (16 March to 26 July 2020). Included participants were employed or self-employed at baseline, alive and aged <65 years in 2020. Poisson regression models were adjusted sequentially for baseline demographic, socioeconomic, work-related, health, and lifestyle-related risk factors to assess risk ratios (RRs) for testing positive in hospital or death due to COVID-19 by three occupational classification schemes (including Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) 2000).ResultsOf 120 075 participants, 271 had severe COVID-19. Relative to non-essential workers, healthcare workers (RR 7.43, 95% CI 5.52 to 10.00), social and education workers (RR 1.84, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.82) and other essential workers (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.45) had a higher risk of severe COVID-19. Using more detailed groupings, medical support staff (RR 8.70, 95% CI 4.87 to 15.55), social care (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.47 to 4.14) and transport workers (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.00) had the highest risk within the broader groups. Compared with white non-essential workers, non-white non-essential workers had a higher risk (RR 3.27, 95% CI 1.90 to 5.62) and non-white essential workers had the highest risk (RR 8.34, 95% CI 5.17 to 13.47). Using SOC 2000 major groups, associate professional and technical occupations, personal service occupations and plant and machine operatives had a higher risk, compared with managers and senior officials.ConclusionsEssential workers have a higher risk of severe COVID-19. These findings underscore the need for national and organisational policies and practices that protect and support workers with an elevated risk of severe COVID-19.
| S-EPMC7611715 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aims to examine whether maternal smoking, birth weight, birth month and breastfeeding are associated with COVID-19 infection and hospitalisation. Maternal smoking was positively associated with COVID-19 infection. Breastfeeding was negatively associated with COVID-19 infection. The odds of being hospitalised due to COVID-19 were higher among those who had lower birthweight and mothers who were smoking during pregnancy.
| S-EPMC7860946 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEpidemiological studies report increased comorbidity between depression and autoimmune diseases. The role of shared genetic influences in the observed comorbidity is unclear. We investigated the evidence for pleiotropy between these traits in the UK Biobank (UKB).MethodsWe defined autoimmune and depression cases using hospital episode statistics, self-reported conditions and medications, and mental health questionnaires. Pairwise comparisons of depression prevalence between autoimmune cases and controls, and vice versa, were performed. Cross-trait polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses tested for pleiotropy, i.e., whether PRSs for depression could predict autoimmune disease status, and vice versa.ResultsWe identified 28,479 cases of autoimmune diseases (pooling across 14 traits) and 324,074 autoimmune controls, and 65,075 cases of depression and 232,552 depression controls. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher in autoimmune cases than in controls, and similarly, the prevalence of autoimmune disease was higher in depression cases than in controls. PRSs for myasthenia gravis and psoriasis were significantly higher in depression cases than in controls (p < 5.2 × 10-5, R 2 ≤ 0.04%). PRSs for depression were significantly higher in inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 1 diabetes cases than in controls (p < 5.8 × 10-5, R 2 range = 0.06%-0.27%), and lower in celiac disease cases than in controls (p < 5.4 × 10-7, R 2 range = 0.11%-0.15%).ConclusionsConsistent with the literature, depression was more common in individuals with autoimmune diseases than in controls, and vice versa. PRSs showed some evidence for involvement of shared genetic factors, but the modest R 2 values suggest that shared genetic architecture accounts for a small proportion of the increased risk across traits.
| S-EPMC8262258 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND AND AIMS:COVID-19 and low levels of vitamin D appear to disproportionately affect black and minority ethnic individuals. We aimed to establish whether blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was associated with COVID-19 risk, and whether it explained the higher incidence of COVID-19 in black and South Asian people. METHODS:UK Biobank recruited 502,624 participants aged 37-73 years between 2006 and 2010. Baseline exposure data, including 25(OH)D concentration and ethnicity, were linked to COVID-19 test results. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between 25(OH)D and confirmed COVID-19, and the association between ethnicity and both 25(OH)D and COVID-19. RESULTS:Complete data were available for 348,598 UK Biobank participants. Of these, 449 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Vitamin D was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.99-0.999; p = 0.013), but not after adjustment for confounders (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.998-1.01; p = 0.208). Ethnicity was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (blacks versus whites OR = 5.32, 95% CI = 3.68-7.70, p-value<0.001; South Asians versus whites OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.65-4.25, p-value<0.001). Adjustment for 25(OH)D concentration made little difference to the magnitude of the association. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings do not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection, nor that vitamin D concentration may explain ethnic differences in COVID-19 infection.
| S-EPMC7204679 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNutritional status influences immunity but its specific association with susceptibility to COVID-19 remains unclear. We examined the association of specific dietary data and incident COVID-19 in the UK Biobank (UKB).MethodsWe considered UKB participants in England with self-reported baseline (2006-2010) data and linked them to Public Health England COVID-19 test results-performed on samples from combined nose/throat swabs, using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-between March and November 2020. Baseline diet factors included breastfed as baby and specific consumption of coffee, tea, oily fish, processed meat, red meat, fruit, and vegetables. Individual COVID-19 exposure was estimated using the UK's average monthly positive case rate per specific geo-populations. Logistic regression estimated the odds of COVID-19 positivity by diet status adjusting for baseline socio-demographic factors, medical history, and other lifestyle factors. Another model was further adjusted for COVID-19 exposure.ResultsEligible UKB participants (n = 37,988) were 40 to 70 years of age at baseline; 17% tested positive for COVID-19 by SAR-CoV-2 PCR. After multivariable adjustment, the odds (95% CI) of COVID-19 positivity was 0.90 (0.83, 0.96) when consuming 2-3 cups of coffee/day (vs. <1 cup/day), 0.88 (0.80, 0.98) when consuming vegetables in the third quartile of servings/day (vs. lowest quartile), 1.14 (1.01, 1.29) when consuming fourth quartile servings of processed meats (vs. lowest quartile), and 0.91 (0.85, 0.98) when having been breastfed (vs. not breastfed). Associations were attenuated when further adjusted for COVID-19 exposure, but patterns of associations remained.ConclusionsIn the UK Biobank, consumption of coffee, vegetables, and being breastfed as a baby were favorably associated with incident COVID-19; intake of processed meat was adversely associated. Although these findings warrant independent confirmation, adherence to certain dietary behaviors may be an additional tool to existing COVID-19 protection guidelines to limit the spread of this virus.
| S-EPMC8234071 | biostudies-literature