Dataset Information

Implications of Alterations in Pre-test Probability in the 2019 Update of ESC Guidelines for Chronic Coronary Syndromes on Diagnostic Accuracy of Pharmacological Stress-Echocardiography: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

With the 2019 update of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for chronic coronary syndromes, the pre-test probabilities (PTPs) based on age, sex, and symptoms have undergone major revisions. We aimed to determine implications of these alterations on diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE).

Methods

We retrospectively included consecutive patients undergoing pharmacological stress-echocardiography for evaluation of suspected obstructive coronary artery disease. DSE was performed as non-invasive imaging test and was indicated by individual treating physician's decision. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value as well as accuracy were assessed for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, defined as revascularization therapy following DSE.

Results

We included 206 patients (mean age 63.2 ± 12.4 years, 59.7% male). 51% of the cohort had a PTP of < 15% according to both scores. 9.2% of patients with PTP < 15% according to the original Diamond and Forrester score had a PTP > 15% according to 2019 ESC guidelines, predominantly due to the accountancy of dyspnea. In contrast, 13.6% of patient had a PTP ≥ 15% according to the original Diamond and Forrester score, while PTP was assessed below this threshold by updated guidelines. The differences in patient selection according to updated guidelines did not alter the diagnostic accuracy of DSE (68% for both).

Conclusions

Changes in assessment of PTP according to updated ESC guidelines from 2019 led to a relevant reclassification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease, ultimately changing the group of patients appropriate for DSE for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Comparing the diagnostic performance in appropriate PTP groups, however, led to similar results.

SUBMITTER: Dykun I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8099569 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Intratumoral immunotherapies aim to trigger local and systemic immunologic responses via direct injection of immunostimulatory agents with the goal of tumor cell lysis, followed by release of tumor-derived antigens and subsequent activation of tumor-specific effector T cells. In 2019, a multitude of intratumoral immunotherapies with varied mechanisms of action, including nononcolytic viral therapies such as PV-10 and toll-like receptor 9 agonists and oncolytic viral therapies such as CAVATAK, Pexa-Vec, and HF10, have been extensively evaluated in clinical trials and demonstrated promising antitumor activity with tolerable toxicities in melanoma and other solid tumor types. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a genetically modified herpes simplex virus type 1-based oncolytic immunotherapy, is the first oncolytic virus approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of unresectable melanoma recurrent after initial surgery. In patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma, T-VEC demonstrated a superior durable response rate (continuous complete response or partial response lasting ?6 months) over subcutaneous GM-CSF (16.3% vs. 2.1%; p < .001). Responses were seen in both injected and uninjected lesions including visceral lesions, suggesting a systemic antitumor response. When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, T-VEC significantly improved response rates compared with single agent; similar results were seen with combinations of checkpoint inhibitors and other intratumoral therapies such as CAVATAK, HF10, and TLR9 agonists. In this review, we highlight recent results from clinical trials of key intratumoral immunotherapies that are being evaluated in the clinic, with a focus on T-VEC in the treatment of advanced melanoma as a model for future solid tumor indications. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review provides oncologists with the latest information on the development of key intratumoral immunotherapies, particularly oncolytic viruses. Currently, T-VEC is the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved oncolytic immunotherapy. This article highlights the efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of T-VEC both as monotherapy and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review summarizes current knowledge on intratumoral therapies, a novel modality with increased utility in cancer treatment, and T-VEC, the only U.S. FDA-approved oncolytic viral therapy, for medical oncologists. This review evaluates approaches to incorporate T-VEC into daily practice to offer the possibility of response in selected melanoma patients with manageable adverse events as compared with other available immunotherapies.

Project description:The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) have recently published recommendations for the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors in situations of very high risk. We aim to assess in the real world the suitability of PCSK9 inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes.We analyzed a prospective Swiss cohort of 2023 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes between 2009 and 2014 with available data for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipid-lowering therapy at 1 year. Clinical familial hypercholesterolemia was defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network algorithm as unlikely, possible, probable, or definite. We simulated a fixed relative reduction of 24% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at 1 year in all patients not treated with ezetimibe, irrespective of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and statin regimen. At 1 year, 94.3% of patients were treated with statin, 5.8% with ezetimibe, and 35.8% of patients had on-target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (<1.8 mmol/L); 25.6% met criteria for possible or probable/definite familial hypercholesterolemia. After a simulation of the lipid-lowering effect of ezetimibe, the proportion of patients who would be eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors at 1 year was 13.4% using American College of Cardiology criteria and 2.7% using European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society criteria. Patients with possible or probable/definite familial hypercholesterolemia were more eligible for PCSK9 inhibitors compared with their non-familial hypercholesterolemia counterparts: 27.6% versus 8.8% according to American College of Cardiology criteria and 6.6% versus 1.8% according to European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society criteria (P<0.001).Recommendations made by the American College of Cardiology guidelines would lead to 5-fold higher eligibility rates for PCSK9 inhibitors compared to the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement in acute coronary syndrome patients.