Dataset Information

The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States and Latin America.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults from vulnerable ethnoracial groups are at high risk of infection, hospitalization, and death. We aimed to explore the pandemic's impact on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States (US), Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru.

Methods

1,608 (646 White, 852 Latino, 77 Black, 33 Asian; 72% female) individuals from the US and four Latin American countries aged ≥ 55 years completed an online survey regarding well-being and cognition during the pandemic between May and September 2020. Outcome variables (pandemic impact, discrimination, loneliness, purpose of life, subjective cognitive concerns) were compared across four US ethnoracial groups and older adults living in Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru.

Findings

Mean age for all participants was 66.7 (SD = 7.7) years and mean education was 15.4 (SD = 2.7) years. Compared to Whites, Latinos living in the US reported greater economic impact (p < .001, η_p ² = 0.031); while Blacks reported experiencing discrimination more often (p < .001, η_p ² = 0.050). Blacks and Latinos reported more positive coping (p < .001, η_p ² = 0.040). Compared to Latinos living in the US, Latinos in Chile, Mexico, and Peru reported greater pandemic impact, Latinos in Mexico and Peru reported more positive coping, Latinos in Argentina, Mexico, and Peru had greater economic impact, and Latinos in Argentina, Chile, and Peru reported less discrimination.

Interpretation

The COVID-19 pandemic has differentially impacted the well-being of older ethnically diverse individuals in the US and Latin America. Future studies should examine how mediators like income and coping skills modify the pandemic's impact.

Funding

Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry.

SUBMITTER: Babulal GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8100067 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States and Latin America.

Babulal Ganesh M GM Torres Valeria L VL Acosta Daisy D Agüero Cinthya C Aguilar-Navarro Sara S Amariglio Rebecca R Ussui Juliana Aya JA Baena Ana A Bocanegra Yamile Y Brucki Sonia Maria Dozzi SMD Bustin Julian J Cabrera Diego M DM Custodio Nilton N Diaz Monica M MM Peñailillo Lissette Duque LD Franco Idalid I Gatchel Jennifer R JR Garza-Naveda Ana Paola AP González Lara Mariana M Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez Lidia L Guzmán-Vélez Edmarie E Hanseeuw Bernard J BJ Jimenez-Velazquez Ivonne Z IZ Rodríguez Tomás León TL Llibre-Guerra Jorge J Marquine María J MJ Martinez Jairo J Medina Luis D LD Miranda-Castillo Claudia C Morlett Paredes Alejandra A Munera Diana D Nuñez-Herrera Alberto A de Oliveira Maira Okada MO Palmer-Cancel Santiago J SJ Pardilla-Delgado Enmanuelle E Perales-Puchalt Jaime J Pluim Celina C Ramirez-Gomez Liliana L Rentz Dorene M DM Rivera-Fernández Claudia C Rosselli Monica M Serrano Cecilia M CM Suing-Ortega Maria Jose MJ Slachevsky Andrea A Soto-Añari Marcio M Sperling Reisa A RA Torrente Fernando F Thumala Daniela D Vannini Patrizia P Vila-Castelar Clara C Yañez-Escalante Tatiana T Quiroz Yakeel T YT

EClinicalMedicine 20210427

<h4>Background</h4>In the COVID-19 pandemic, older adults from vulnerable ethnoracial groups are at high risk of infection, hospitalization, and death. We aimed to explore the pandemic's impact on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States (US), Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Peru.<h4>Methods</h4>1,608 (646 White, 852 Latino, 77 Black, 33 Asian; 72% female) individuals from the US and four Latin American countries aged ≥ 55 years completed an online survey regarding ...[more]

PMID: 33997742

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePremature death rates vary in the United States by race/ethnicity. Despite their socioeconomic disadvantages, US Latino populations have lower premature mortality rates than do US white populations, a phenomenon termed the "Latino or Hispanic paradox."ObjectiveTo investigate whether there is a broader Latin American paradox by comparing premature mortality rates in the United States according to race/ethnicity with rates in Latin America and Puerto Rico from 2001 to 2015.Design, setting, and participantsThis descriptive cross-sectional study used mortality data from the World Health Organization Mortality Database. All deaths occurring in individuals aged 20 to 64 years among US Latino, African American, white, and Puerto Rican and 12 other Latin American populations from January 2001 to December 2015 were selected. The data analysis began in October 2018.ExposuresAge, sex, race/ethnicity, and country.Main outcomes and measuresAll-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, age-standardized mortality rates (AMSRs), and average annual percentage change in mortality rates during 2001 to 2015.ResultsDuring 2001 to 2015, 22 million deaths (8 million women and 14 million men) occurred among individuals aged 20 to 64 years in the selected populations. Among women, US Latina individuals had the lowest premature mortality rates (ASMR for 2015, 144 deaths per 100 000 population) and US African American women had the highest premature mortality rate (ASMR for 2015, 340 deaths per 100 000 population) of the 16 populations studied. Rates among US white women shifted from the sixth lowest in 2001 (ASMR, 231 deaths per 100 000 population) to the 12th lowest in 2015 (ASMR, 235 deaths per 100 000 population). Among men, Peru had the lowest premature mortality rates (ASMR for 2015, 219 deaths per 100 000 population), and Belize had the highest premature mortality rates (ASMR for 2015, 702 deaths per 100 000 population). White men in the United States shifted from the fifth lowest rates in 2001 (ASMR, 396 deaths per 100 000 population) to the eighth lowest rates in 2015 (ASMR, 394 deaths per 100 000 population). Rates for both women and men decreased in all the populations studied from 2001 to 2015 (average annual percentage change range, 0.4% to 3.8% per year) except among US white populations, for which the rate plateaued (average annual percentage change, 0.02% per year [95% CI, -0.3% to 0.2% per year] for women; -0.2% per year [95% CI, -0.4% to 0.0% per year] for men) and among Nicaraguan men, for whom the rates increased (0.6% per year [95% CI, 0.2% to 1.0% per year]). The populations with the lowest mortality rates in 2015 had lower rates from all major causes, but rates were particularly lower for heart disease (21 deaths per 100 000 population) and cancer (50 deaths per 100 000 population).Conclusions and relevancePremature mortality rates are lower for US Latino populations and several Latin American countries than for US white populations, suggesting that there may be a broader Latin American paradox. This analysis also highlights the high premature mortality rates among US African American populations, especially women, compared with many Latin American populations.

Project description:BackgroundStudies and meta-analyses found individual, meso and micro-social factors that are associated with individual well-being, as well as a positive socio-emotional climate or collective well-being.AimThis article simultaneously studies and examines these factors of well-being.MethodWell-Being is measured as a dependent variable at the individual and collective level, as well as the predictors, in three cross-sectional and one longitudinal studies. Education and social intervention workers (N = 1300, K = 80) from Chile, Spain and Uruguay participate; a subsample of educators (k = 1, n = 37) from the south central Chile and from Chile, Uruguay and Spain (n = 1149); workers from organizations in Latin America and Southern Europe, military cadets from Argentina (N < 1000); and teams (K = 14) from Spanish companies.ResultsIndividual and collective well-being indicators were related, suggesting that the emotional climate as a context improves personal well-being. Individual factors (emotional creativity and openness and universalism values), psychosocial factors (low stress, control over work and social support supervisors and peers) were positively associated with personal well-being in education and social intervention context. Organizational dynamic or transformational culture is directly and indirectly associated with individual well-being through previously described psychosocial factors. Group processes such as internal communication and safe participation, task orientation or climate of excellence as well as leadership style that reinforces participation and belonging, were positively associated with collective well-being in labor and military context and predict team work socio-emotional climate in a longitudinal study- but were unrelated to individual well-being. Transformational leadership plays a mediating role between functional factors and social-emotional climate in work teams. Organizational role autonomy, functional organizational leadership, integration and resources were associated with collective well-being in organizations. Organizational leadership moderates the relationship between task orientation and collective well-being in military context.ConclusionIndividual and microsocial factors influence personal well-being. Meso level factors favorable to well-being through processes which reinforce social belonging, influence directly collective well-being and indirectly personal well-being. Leadership that reinforces participation and belonging play a central role for emotional climate. Stress and emotional climate playing an important pivotal role for psychological well-being.

Dataset Information

The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States and Latin America.

Background

Methods

Findings

Interpretation

Funding

Publications

The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being and cognition of older adults living in the United States and Latin America.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets