Dataset Information

Beta-lactam-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions: A genome-wide association study of a deeply phenotyped cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Background

β-lactam antibiotics are associated with a variety of immune-mediated or hypersensitivity reactions, including immediate (type I) reactions mediated by antigen-specific IgE.

Objective

We sought to identify genetic predisposing factors for immediate reactions to β-lactam antibiotics.

Methods

Patients with a clinical history of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to either penicillins or cephalosporins, which were immunologically confirmed, were recruited from allergy clinics. A genome-wide association study was conducted on 662 patients (the discovery cohort) with a diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity and the main finding was replicated in a cohort of 98 Spanish cases, recruited using the same diagnostic criteria as the discovery cohort.

Results

Genome-wide association study identified rs71542416 within the Class II HLA region as the top hit (P = 2 × 10^-14); this was in linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DRB1∗10:01 (odds ratio, 2.93; P = 5.4 × 10^-7) and HLA-DQA1∗01:05 (odds ratio, 2.93, P = 5.4 × 10^-7). Haplotype analysis identified that HLA-DRB1∗10:01 was a risk factor even without the HLA-DQA1∗01:05 allele. The association with HLA-DRB1∗10:01 was replicated in another cohort, with the meta-analysis of the discovery and replication cohorts showing that HLA-DRB1∗10:01 increased the risk of immediate hypersensitivity at a genome-wide level (odds ratio, 2.96; P = 4.1 × 10^-9). No association with HLA-DRB1∗10:01 was identified in 268 patients with delayed hypersensitivity reactions to β-lactams.

Conclusions

HLA-DRB1∗10:01 predisposed to immediate hypersensitivity reactions to penicillins. Further work to identify other predisposing HLA and non-HLA loci is required.

SUBMITTER: Nicoletti P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8100096 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDNA copy number variants (CNVs) are found in 15% of subjects with ID but their association with phenotypic abnormalities has been predominantly studied in smaller cohorts of subjects with detailed yet non-systematically categorized phenotypes, or larger cohorts (thousands of cases) with smaller number of generalized phenotypes.MethodsWe evaluated the association of de novo, familial and common CNVs detected in 78 ID subjects with phenotypic abnormalities classified using the Winter-Baraitser Dysmorphology Database (WBDD) (formerly the London Dysmorphology Database). Terminology for 34 primary (coarse) and 169 secondary (fine) phenotype features were used to categorize the abnormal phenotypes and determine the prevalence of each phenotype in patients grouped by the type of CNV they had.ResultsIn our cohort more than 50% of cases had abnormalities in primary categories related to head (cranium, forehead, ears, eye globes, eye associated structures, nose) as well as hands and feet. The median number of primary and secondary abnormalities was 12 and 18 per subject, respectively, indicating that the cohort consisted of subjects with a high number of phenotypic abnormalities (median De Vries score for the cohort was 5). The prevalence of each phenotypic abnormality was comparable in patients with de novo or familial CNVs in comparison to those with only common CNVs, although a trend for increased frequency of cranial and forehead abnormalities was noted in subjects with rare de novo and familial CNVs. Two clusters of subjects were identified based on the prevalence of each fine phenotypic feature, with an average of 28.3 and 13.5 abnormal phenotypes/subject in the two clusters respectively (P?<?0.05).ConclusionsOur study is a rare example of using standardized, deep morphologic phenotype clustering with phenotype/CNV correlation in a cohort of subjects with ID. The composition of the cohort inevitably influences the phenotype/genotype association, and our studies show that the influence of the de novo CNVs on the phenotype is less obvious in cohorts consisting of subjects with a high number of phenotypic abnormalities. The outcome of phenotype/genotype analysis also depends on the choice of phenotypes assessed and standardized phenotyping is required to minimize variability.

Project description:The etiology of severe forms of COVID19, especially in young patients, remains a salient unanswered question. Here we build built on a 3-tier cohort where all individuals/patients were strictly below 50 years of age and where a number of comorbidities were excluded at study onset. Besides healthy controls (N=22), these included patients in the intensive care unit with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) (“critical group”; N=47), and those in a non-critical care ward under supplemental oxygen (“non-critical group”, N=25). This highly curated cohort allowed us to perform a deep multi-omics approach, which included whole genome sequencing, whole blood RNA-sequencing, plasma and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells proteomics, multiplex cytokine profiling, mass-cytometry-based immune cell profiling in conjunction with viral parameters i.e. anti-SARS-Cov-2 neutralizing antibodies and multi-target antiviral serology. Critical patients were characterized by an exacerbated inflammatory state, perturbed lymphoid and myeloid cell compartments, signatures of dysregulated blood coagulation and active regulation of viral entry into the cells. A unique gene signature that differentiates critical from non-critical patients was identified by an ensemble of machine learning, deep learning and quantum annealing approachmethods. Within this gene networksignature, Sstructural Causal causal Modeling modeling identified several genes that may potentially drivepromote ARDS driver genes etiology, among which the up-regulated metalloprotease ADAM9 seems to be a key driver. Inhibition of ADAM9 ex vivo interfered with SARS-Cov-2 uptake and replication in human epithelial cells. In brief, Hence we applyied an advanced integrated machine learning approach and probabilistic programming strategy to identify causal molecular driver geness for of severe forms of COVID-19 in a small, uncluttered tightly controlled cohort of patients, the importance of which were then validated with experiments.