Dataset Information

A retrospective epidemiological study of type 1 diabetes mellitus in wales, UK between 2008 and 2018.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Studies of prevalence and the demographic profile of type 1 diabetes are challenging because of the relative rarity of the condition, however, these outcomes can be determined using routine healthcare data repositories. Understanding the epidemiology of type 1 diabetes allows for targeted interventions and care of this life-affecting condition.

Objectives

To describe the prevalence, incidence and demographics of persons with type 1 diabetes diagnosed in Wales, UK, using the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank.

Methods

Data derived from primary and secondary care throughout Wales available in the SAIL Databank were used to identify people with type 1 diabetes to determine the prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes over a 10 year period (2008-18) and describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of this population by age, socioeconomic deprivation and settlement type. The seasonal variation in incidence rates was also examined.

Results

The prevalence of type 1 diabetes in 2018 was 0.32% in the whole population, being greater in men compared to women (0.35% vs 0.28% respectively); highest in those aged 15-29 years (0.52%) and living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas (0.38%). The incidence of type 1 diabetes over 10 years was 14.0 cases/100,000 people/year for the whole population of Wales. It was highest in children aged 0-14 years (33.6 cases/100,000 people/year) and areas of high socioeconomic deprivation (16.8 cases/100,000 people/year) and least in those aged 45-60 years (6.5 cases/100,000 people/year) and in areas of low socioeconomic deprivation (11.63 cases/100,000 people/year). A seasonal trend in the diagnoses of type 1 diabetes was observed with higher incidence in winter months.

Conclusion

This nation-wide retrospective epidemiological study using routine data revealed that the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Wales was greatest in those aged 0-14 years with a higher incidence and prevalence in the most deprived areas. These findings illustrate the need for health-related policies targeted at high deprivation areas to include type 1 diabetes in their remit.

SUBMITTER: Rafferty J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8103995 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: We sought to investigate the methodological and reporting quality of published systematic reviews describing randomized controlled trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus and analyze their association with status of protocol registration. Methods: We searched the PubMed database and identified non-Cochrane systematic reviews, with or without meta-analysis, reporting on type 2 diabetes mellitus and published between 2005 and 2018. We then randomly selected 20% of these reviews in each year, and performed methodological and reporting quality assessment using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review 2 (AMSTAR-2) checklist and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We also conducted regression analyses to explore the association between characteristics of systematic reviews and AMSTAR-2 or PRISMA scores. Results: A total of 238 systematic reviews, including 33 registered and 205 non-registered articles, met the inclusion criteria and were subsequently reviewed. Analysis indicated an increase in both registered rates and quality of systematic reviews in type 2 diabetes mellitus over the recent years. With regards to methodological and reporting quality, we found higher scores in registered, relative to non-registered reviews (AMSTAR-2 mean score: 18.0 vs. 14.5, P = 0.000; PRISMA mean score: 20.4 vs. 17.6, P = 0.000). AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA scores were associated with registration status, country of the first author, and statistical results, whereas the proportion of discussing publication bias and reporting funding sources were <40% for both registered and non-registered systematic reviews. Conclusions: Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews in type 2 diabetes mellitus indicates an improvement in the recent years. However, the overall quality remains low, necessitating further improvement. Future studies are expected to pay more attention to prospective registration, description of publication bias and reporting of funding sources.

Project description:Background: In humans with sepsis, hypophosphatemia is a marker of illness severity and a negative prognostic indicator. Hypophosphatemia has not been previously investigated in dogs with sepsis, however. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of hypophosphatemia in dogs, the prevalence of presumptive sepsis in dogs with hypophosphatemia, the prevalence of hypophosphatemia in dogs with presumptive sepsis and the association between outcome and hypophosphatemia in dogs with presumptive sepsis. Methods: Electronic medical records of the Cornell University Hospital for Animals from 2008-2018 were queried to identify all dogs with hypophosphatemia and all dogs with presumptive sepsis. Hypophosphatemia was defined as a serum phosphate concentration <2.7 mg/dL. Sepsis was presumed where ≥2 of 4 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were satisfied associated with a documented or highly suspected infection. Variables were assessed for normality using the D'Agostino-Pearson test. Continuous variables were compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in frequency between categorical variables were analyzed using contingency tables, calculation of Fisher's exact test or Chi2 and estimation of odds ratios. Results: In the study period, 47,992 phosphate concentration measurements from 23,752 unique dogs were identified. After eliminating repeat analyses, the period prevalence of hypophosphatemia on a per dog basis over the 11-year study period was 10.6% (2,515/23,752). The prevalence of presumptive sepsis within dogs with hypophosphatemia was 10.7% (268/2,515). During the 11-year study period, 4,406 dogs with an infection were identified, of which 1,233 were diagnosed with presumptive sepsis and had a contemporaneous phosphate concentration. Hypophosphatemia was more prevalent in dogs with presumptive sepsis than in dogs without 21.7 vs. 10.2%; OR 2.44 [95% CI 2.12-2.81]; P < 0.0001. The mortality rate was greater in dogs with hypophosphatemia and presumptive sepsis than in dogs with hypophosphatemia without presumptive sepsis (15.3 vs. 3.1%; OR 5.70 [95% CI 3.76-8.52]; P < 0.0001), however hypophosphatemia was not associated with outcome in dogs with presumptive sepsis OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.60-1.26]; P = 0.518. Conclusions: In dogs with hypophosphatemia, a presumed diagnosis of sepsis was associated with increased mortality compared to other associated disease processes. In dogs with presumptive sepsis, hypophosphatemia was not associated with outcome.