Musculoskeletal ultrasound for ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To clarify if musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) would give additional information for the clinical examination to diagnose and evaluate the activity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Methods
A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Sinomed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CINK), and Wanfang databases from their inceptions to May 15, 2020. Studies that examined the musculoskeletal US, which detected sacroiliac joints in people with AS were included. The pooled analyses were performed using Meta Disc version 1.4 software.Results
A total of 9 studies encompassing 984 participants were included. Statistical analysis suggested an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9259 (sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.54) indicating that US had excellent diagnostic test accuracy for AS, an AUC of 0.6441 (sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.51) indicating that the US did not have a good diagnostic test accuracy for AS activity. A subgroup analysis revealed that the AUC of power Doppler US (PDUS) and color Doppler US (CDUS) was 0.5000 and 0.9274, respectively, indicating that CDUS was superior to PDUS.Conclusion
US, especially CDUS, is a valid and reproducible technique for the diagnosis of AS. While the accuracy of AS activity evaluation of the US is not ideal. It may be considered for routine use as part of the standard diagnostic tools in AS.
SUBMITTER: Zhu L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8104287 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Current knowledge about the overall and site-specific risk of malignancy associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to address this knowledge gap. Five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane library and the virtual health library) were systematically searched. A manual search of publications within the last 2 years in key journals in the field (Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Rheumatology and Arthritis &rheumatology) was also performed. STATA 11.2 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. After screening, twenty-three studies, of different designs, were eligible for meta-analysis. AS is associated with a 14% (pooled RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.25) increase in the overall risk for malignancy. Compared to controls, patients with AS are at a specific increased risk for malignancy of the digestive system (pooled RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.42), multiple myelomas (pooled RR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.69) and lymphomas (pooled RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.57). On subgroup analysis, evidence from high quality cohort studies indicated that AS patients from Asia are at highest risk for malignancy overall. Confirmation of findings from large-scale longitudinal studies is needed to identify specific risk factors and to evaluate treatment effects.
| S-EPMC4989281 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of this study was to provide a summary estimate of depression prevalence among people with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in comparison to those without AS. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, the Cochrane database library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database from their inception to December 2016. The results showed that thirty-one eligible studies involving 8,106 patients were analyzed. Fifteen methods of defining depression were reported. The overall pooled prevalence of depression was 35% (95% CI, 28-43%), with high between-study heterogeneity (I2=98.8%, p<0.001). The relative risk of depression among people with AS was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.21-2.55, eight studies, n=3,006) compared with people without AS. The depression score [standardized mean difference (SMD)=0.43, 95% CI: 0.19-0.67, seven studies, n=549] was higher in AS patients than in controls. The main influence on depression prevalence was the sample size and country of origin. In conclusion, one-third of people with AS experience symptoms of depression. Depression was more prevalent in AS patients than in controls. Further research is needed to identify effective strategies for preventing and treating depression among AS patients.
| S-EPMC6710421 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesPrevious studies showed conflicting results regarding peripheral vitamin D levels in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis to explore whether vitamin D may influence AS process.MethodsArticles published until March 2022 were searched in databases as follows: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The present study included cross-sectional and case-control studies regarding vitamin D levels in patients with AS. Studies were excluded according to the following exclusion criteria: (1) we excluded studies which did not provide sufficient information regarding the comparison of vitamin D levels in AS patients and healthy controls (HC). Vitamin D levels in the two group studies should be reported or could be calculated in included studies; (2) meta-analysis, reviews and case reports. STATA 12.0 software was used to make a meta-analysis. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed as effect size.ResultsThe present meta-analysis showed no significant difference in peripheral 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25OHD) levels between AS and healthy controls (HCs) in Caucasians with a random effects model [SMD: -0.68, 95% CI (-1.90, 0.54)]. Patients with AS had lower peripheral 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels compared with HC with a random effects model [SMD: -0.45, 95% CI: (-0.70, -0.20)]. Patients with AS had higher peripheral C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels compared with HC in Caucasian population with random effects models [CRP: SMD: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.78, 1.37); ESR: SMD: 0.86, 95% CI: (0.39, 1.34)]. However, no significant difference in alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathyroid hormone (PTH) or calcium levels were indicated between AS and HC in Caucasian with random effects models [ALP: SMD: 0.07, 95% CI: (-0.41, 0.55); PTH: SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: (-0.56, 0.26); calcium: SMD: -0.06, 95% CI: (-0.39, 0.26)].ConclusionIn conclusion, the study showed an inverse association between 25OHD and AS, which suggests that vitamin D may have a protective effect on AS. ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP) are important biomarkers for AS.
| S-EPMC9458854 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSeveral immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus have been linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the data on ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are limited.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that reported odds ratio, relative risk, hazard ratio, or standardized incidence ratio comparing the risk of VTE and possible pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with AS versus non-AS participants. Pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.ResultsOf 423 potentially relevant articles, three studies met our inclusion criteria and thus, were included in the data analysis. The pooled risk ratio of VTE in patients with AS was 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.05-2.44). The statistical heterogeneity of this study was high with an I2 of 93%.ConclusionOur study demonstrated a statistically significant increased VTE risk among patients with AS.
| S-EPMC5112821 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrevious literature on the association between infections and the risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis (AS) presented controversial results. This meta-analysis aimed to quantitatively investigate the effect of infections on the risk of AS.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases until March 26, 2021 for analytical epidemiological studies on the association between infections and the risk of AS. Fixed or random effect models were used to calculate total risk estimates based on study heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were also performed. Publication bias was estimated using funnel plots and Begg's test.ResultsSix case-control articles (n=1,296,239) and seven cohort articles (n=7,618,524) were incorporated into our meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) from these case-control studies showed that infections were associated with an increased risk of AS (OR=1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.73), and the pooled relative risk (RR) from the cohort studies showed the same findings (RR=1.35, 95% CI, 1.12-1.63). Subgroup analysis showed that infections in participants with unadjusted comorbidities (OR=1.66, 95% CI, 1.35-2.03), other types of infection (OR=1.40, 95% CI, 1.15-1.70), and infection of the immune system (OR=1.46, 95% CI, 1.42-1.49) were associated with the risk of AS in case-control studies. In cohort studies, infections with adjusted comorbidities (RR=1.39, 95% CI, 1.15-1.68), viral infection (RR=1.43, 95% CI, 1.22-1.66), other types of infection (RR=1.44, 95% CI, 1.12-1.86), and other sites of infection (RR=1.36, 95% CI, 1.11-1.67) were associated with an increased risk of AS.ConclusionsThe findings of this meta-analysis confirm that infections significantly increase the risks of AS. This is helpful in providing an essential basis for the prevention of AS via the avoidance of infections.
| S-EPMC8569302 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of this study was to determine the role of global postural reeducation for people with ankylosing spondylitis. We compared the effects of treatments on pain, dysfunction (using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index), range of motion, and chest expansion in a specific population aged over 18 years old with ankylosing spondylitis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statements. The search was conducted using the PubMed, Physiotherapy Database (PEDro), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science (WoS) databases. Clinical trials and systematic reviews/meta-analysis were reviewed. Results: 154 studies were found. Finally, four were included. Conclusions: global postural reeducation is beneficial for ankylosing spondylitis, but no more so than other conventional treatments, except for spinal mobility, where Global Postural Reeducation demonstrated an advantage.
| S-EPMC7565990 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions supervised by a physiotherapist in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis, PROSPERO Protocol number CRD42020209453. Five databases (PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, Web of Science Core, and EMBASE) and reference lists with relevant articles were searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions supervised by a physiotherapist were compared with usual care or home-based exercise programmes. Two investigators independently screened eligible studies. A total of 12 RCTs satisfied eligible criteria. The risk of bias ranged between medium and high. The meta-analysis results indicated that between supervised physiotherapy and usual care, the former was significantly associated with improvement in disease activity (standardised mean difference = -0.37, 95% CI, -0.64; -0.11; p < 0.001, I2 = 71.25%, n = 629), and functional capacity (standardised mean difference = -0.36, 95% CI, -0.61; -0.12, p < 0.05; n = 629). No statistically significant differences emerged when interventions were compared with home-based exercise programmes. Supervised physiotherapy is more effective than usual care in improving disease activity, functional capacity, and pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. No significant improvements emerged when supervised physiotherapy and home-based exercise programmes were compared. Further investigation and RCTs with larger samples are needed.
| S-EPMC8775656 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are the most common therapies used in AS, however, the associated long-term cardiovascular risk is unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association of therapies used for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) such as NSAIDs and TNFi on cardiovascular events (CVE) in AS.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed from database inception to May 29, 2020 to include controlled studies of AS treated with NSAIDs, oral small molecules, or biologics reporting CVE. Study-specific risk ratios (RR) were pooled using a random effects model.ResultsNine non-randomized studies from 1570 studies screened fulfilled inclusion criteria. Among NSAID users as a whole versus no NSAIDs, no increased risk of CVE (composite outcome) was observed; however, the risk of cerebrovascular accident was significantly lower (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, I2 = 66%). Cox-2 inhibitor use was associated with reduced risk of all CVE (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70, I2 = 0%). Non-selective NSAIDs were not associated with any increased/decreased risk of any CVE. Meta-analysis of three studies of MI did not show a significant association with TNFi (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57-1.35, I2 = 76%).ConclusionsIn this meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, NSAID users as a whole and users of non-selective NSAIDs did not seem to have a higher risk of any CVE. Limited data suggest a lower risk of composite CVE outcome with Cox-2 inhibitors, unlike the increased risk reported in the general population. No significant association between TNFi and MI was observed. The certainty in evidence was very low due to all studies being observational. More studies are needed to study the association between TNFi use and CVE in general to evaluate a possible protective role in AS.
| S-EPMC7695658 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Abnormal expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) were observed in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in recent articles, suggesting that miRNAs may be used as biomarkers for AS diagnoses. In this paper, we conducted a meta-analysis to identify the overall diagnostic accuracy of miRNA biomarkers in AS patients. Methods: An extensive search was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, and Wan Fang database up to 30 December 2020 using the following key words: ("microRNAs" or "microRNA" or "miRNA" or "miR" or "RNA, Micro" or "Primary MicroRNA") and ("Spondylitis Ankylosing" or "Spondyloarthritis Ankylopoietica" or "Ankylosing Spondylarthritis" or "Ankylosing Spondylarthritides" or "Spondylarthritides Ankylosing" or "Ankylosing Spondylitis") and ("blood" or "serum" or "plasma"). Statistical evaluation of dysregulated miRNAs using the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Twenty-nine articles reporting on the miRNAs of AS were included. A total of 42 miRNAs were observed to be up-regulated and 45 miRNAs were down-regulated in the AS cases compared with the controls. Besides, 29 studies from nine articles were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0. 76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.81), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85), 3.75 (95% CI, 2.82-5.01), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.39), 12.32 (95% CI, 7.65-19.83), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), respectively, suggesting a good diagnostic accuracy of miRNAs for AS. Conclusions: Circulating miRNAs are deregulated in AS patients. miRNAs may be used as a relatively non-invasive biomarkers for the detection of AS.
| S-EPMC8383110 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the relative efficacy of current and investigational biologic and oral small molecule (OSM) treatments for active ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify all phase 2/3 randomized trials of interest in patients with AS. Outcomes assessed were ??20% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Criteria (ASAS20) and change from baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at weeks 12-16. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted for outcomes using a random effects model. Baseline-risk adjustment was also conducted to account for differences in placebo response across studies. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA) values are reported, reflecting the relative probability that intervention was the best of all interventions.ResultsThe investigational agent tofacitinib 5 mg was the top-ranked treatment (SUCRA, 93%) for ASAS20 response, followed by intravenous (IV) golimumab 2 mg/kg (90%). Golimumab IV 2 mg/kg and infliximab 5 mg/kg were the top two ranked treatments for change from baseline in BASFI (golimumab IV, 81%; infliximab, 80%) and change from baseline in CRP (infliximab, 90%; golimumab IV, 82%).ConclusionsTwo approved therapies (golimumab IV, infliximab) and one investigational product ranked highest for efficacy in AS. Key Points • Although golimumab IV, infliximab, and tofacitinib ranked highest for efficacy in AS, differences in efficacy between approved and investigational therapies were not statistically significant.
| S-EPMC7338808 | biostudies-literature