Dataset Information

The application of a workflow integrating the variable reproducibility and harmonizability of radiomic features on a phantom dataset.

ABSTRACT: Radiomics-the high throughput extraction of quantitative features from medical images and their correlation with clinical and biological endpoints- is the subject of active and extensive research. Although the field shows promise, the generalizability of radiomic signatures is affected significantly by differences in scan acquisition and reconstruction settings. Previous studies reported on the sensitivity of radiomic features (RFs) to test-retest variability, inter-observer segmentation variability, and intra-scanner variability. A framework involving robust radiomics analysis and the application of a post-reconstruction feature harmonization method using ComBat was recently proposed to address these challenges. In this study, we investigated the reproducibility of RFs across different scanners and scanning parameters using this framework. We analysed thirteen scans of a ten-layer phantom that were acquired differently. Each layer was subdivided into sixteen regions of interest (ROIs), and the scans were compared in a pairwise manner, resulting in seventy-eight different scenarios. Ninety-one RFs were extracted from each ROI. As hypothesized, we demonstrate that the reproducibility of a given RF is not a constant but is dependent on the heterogeneity found in the data under analysis. The number (%) of reproducible RFs varied across the pairwise scenarios investigated, having a wide range between 8 (8.8%) and 78 (85.7%) RFs. Furthermore, in contrast to what has been previously reported, and as hypothesized in the robust radiomics analysis framework, our results demonstrate that ComBat cannot be applied to all RFs but rather on a percentage of those-the "ComBatable" RFs-which differed depending on the data being harmonized. The number (%) of reproducible RFs following ComBat harmonization varied across the pairwise scenarios investigated, ranging from 14 (15.4%) to 80 (87.9%) RFs, and was found to depend on the heterogeneity in the data. We conclude that the standardization of image acquisition protocols remains the cornerstone for improving the reproducibility of RFs, and the generalizability of the signatures developed. Our proposed approach helps identify the reproducible RFs across different datasets.

SUBMITTER: Ibrahim A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8104396 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExisting studies have demonstrated that imaging parameters may affect radiomic features. However, the influence of feature calculating parameters has been overlooked. The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of feature calculating parameters (gray-level range and bin size) on the reproducibility of CT radiomic features.MethodsThirty-six CT scans from an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom were acquired with different imaging parameters including effective dose, pitch, slice thicknesses and reconstruction kernels. The influence of feature calculating parameters was investigated in terms of three gray-level ranges and eleven gray-level bin sizes. Feature reproducibility was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with the cutoff value of 0.8 and the coefficient of variation (CV) with the cutoff value of 20%. The agreements of reproducible features in different ranges and bin sizes were analyzed by Kendall's W test and Kappa test. The proportions of reproducible features, in terms of two calculating, four imaging and two segmentation parameters, were evaluated using Cochran's Q test and Dunn's test.ResultsFor the three gray-level ranges, 50% (44/88) of features were reproducible with a perfect agreement (Kendall's W coefficient 0.844, P<0.001). Of the 72 features that may be influenced by gray-level bin size, 33.3% (24/72) were reproducible for 11 bin sizes with a perfect agreement (Kendall's W coefficient 0.879, P<0.001). For the proportions of reproducible features, there was no statistically significant difference among three ranges (P=0.420), but there was among eleven bin sizes (P=0.013). The proportions of reproducible features in feature calculating parameters were statistically significantly lower than those in imaging parameters (adjusted P<0.05).ConclusionsFeature calculating parameters may have a greater influence than imaging parameters on the reproducibility of CT radiomic features, which should be given special attention in clinical applications.

Project description:PurposeAn ever-growing number of predictive models used to inform clinical decision making have included quantitative, computer-extracted imaging biomarkers, or "radiomic features." Broadly generalizable validity of radiomics-assisted models may be impeded by concerns about reproducibility. We offer a qualitative synthesis of 41 studies that specifically investigated the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features, derived from a systematic review of published peer-reviewed literature.Methods and materialsThe PubMed electronic database was searched using combinations of the broad Haynes and Ingui filters along with a set of text words specific to cancer, radiomics (including texture analyses), reproducibility, and repeatability. This review has been reported in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From each full-text article, information was extracted regarding cancer type, class of radiomic feature examined, reporting quality of key processing steps, and statistical metric used to segregate stable features.ResultsAmong 624 unique records, 41 full-text articles were subjected to review. The studies primarily addressed non-small cell lung cancer and oropharyngeal cancer. Only 7 studies addressed in detail every methodologic aspect related to image acquisition, preprocessing, and feature extraction. The repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features are sensitive at various degrees to processing details such as image acquisition settings, image reconstruction algorithm, digital image preprocessing, and software used to extract radiomic features. First-order features were overall more reproducible than shape metrics and textural features. Entropy was consistently reported as one of the most stable first-order features. There was no emergent consensus regarding either shape metrics or textural features; however, coarseness and contrast appeared among the least reproducible.ConclusionsInvestigations of feature repeatability and reproducibility are currently limited to a small number of cancer types. Reporting quality could be improved regarding details of feature extraction software, digital image manipulation (preprocessing), and the cutoff value used to distinguish stable features.

Project description:PurposeTo investigate reproducibility of myocardial radiomic features with cardiac MRI.Materials and methodsTest-retest studies were performed with a 3-T MRI system using commonly used cardiac MRI sequences of cine balanced steady-state free precession (cine bSSFP), T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging, and quantitative T1 and T2 mapping in phantom experiments and 10 healthy participants (mean ± standard deviation age, 29 years ± 13). In addition, this study assessed repeatability in 51 patients (56 years ± 14) who underwent imaging twice during the same session. Three readers independently delineated the myocardium to investigate inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of radiomic features. A total of 1023 radiomic features were extracted by using PyRadiomics (https://pyradiomics.readthedocs.io/) with 11 image filters and six feature families. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated to assess reproducibility and repeatability, and features with ICCs greater than or equal to 0.8 were considered reproducible.ResultsDifferent reproducibility patterns were observed among sequences in in vivo test-retest studies. In cine bSSFP, the gray-level run-length matrix was the most reproducible feature family, and the wavelet low-pass filter applied horizontally and vertically was the most reproducible image filter. In T1 and T2 maps, intensity-based statistics (first-order) and gray-level co-occurrence matrix features were the most reproducible feature families, without a dominant reproducible image filter. Across all sequences, gray-level nonuniformity was the most frequently identified reproducible feature name. In inter- and intraobserver reproducibility studies, respectively, only 32%-47% and 61%-73% of features were identified as reproducible.ConclusionOnly a small subset of myocardial radiomic features was reproducible, and these reproducible radiomic features varied among different sequences. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Leiner in this issue.

Project description:PurposeThe availability of radiographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) has opened up opportunities for development of radiomic markers for prognostic/predictive applications in glioblastoma (GBM). In this work, we address two critical challenges with regard to developing robust radiomic approaches: (a) the lack of availability of reliable segmentation labels for glioblastoma tumor sub-compartments (i.e., enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor core, peritumoral edematous/infiltrated tissue) and (b) identifying "reproducible" radiomic features that are robust to segmentation variability across readers/sites.Acquisition and validation methodsFrom TCIA's Ivy GAP cohort, we obtained a paired set (n = 31) of expert annotations approved by two board-certified neuroradiologists at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and at Case Western Reserve University (CWRU). For these studies, we performed a reproducibility study that assessed the variability in (a) segmentation labels and (b) radiomic features, between these paired annotations. The radiomic variability was assessed on a comprehensive panel of 11 700 radiomic features including intensity, volumetric, morphologic, histogram-based, and textural parameters, extracted for each of the paired sets of annotations. Our results demonstrated (a) a high level of inter-rater agreement (median value of DICE ≥0.8 for all sub-compartments), and (b) ≈24% of the extracted radiomic features being highly correlated (based on Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) to annotation variations. These robust features largely belonged to morphology (describing shape characteristics), intensity (capturing intensity profile statistics), and COLLAGE (capturing heterogeneity in gradient orientations) feature families.Data format and usage notesWe make publicly available on TCIA's Analysis Results Directory (https://doi.org/10.7937/9j41-7d44), the complete set of (a) multi-institutional expert annotations for the tumor sub-compartments, (b) 11 700 radiomic features, and (c) the associated reproducibility meta-analysis.Potential applicationsThe annotations and the associated meta-data for Ivy GAP are released with the purpose of enabling researchers toward developing image-based biomarkers for prognostic/predictive applications in GBM.

Project description:BackgroundRadiomics analysis usually involves, especially in multicenter and large hospital studies, different imaging protocols for acquisition, reconstruction, and processing of data. Differences in protocols can lead to differences in the quantification of the biomarker distribution, leading to radiomic feature variability. The aim of our study was to identify those radiomic features robust to the different degrading factors in positron emission tomography (PET) studies. We proposed the use of the standardized measurements of the European Association Research Ltd. (EARL) accreditation to retrospectively identify the radiomic features having low variability to the different systems and reconstruction protocols. In addition, we presented a reproducible procedure to identify PET radiomic features robust to PET/CT imaging metal artifacts. In 27 heterogeneous homemade phantoms for which ground truth was accurately defined by CT segmentation, we evaluated the segmentation accuracy and radiomic feature reliability given by the contrast-oriented algorithm (COA) and the 40% threshold PET segmentation. In the comparison of two data sets, robustness was defined by Wilcoxon rank tests, bias was quantified by Bland-Altman (BA) plot analysis, and strong correlations were identified by Spearman correlation test (r > 0.8 and p satisfied multiple test Bonferroni correction).ResultsForty-eight radiomic features were robust to system, 22 to resolution, 102 to metal artifacts, and 42 to different PET segmentation tools. Overall, only 4 radiomic features were simultaneously robust to all degrading factors. Although both segmentation approaches significantly underestimated the volume with respect to the ground truth, with relative deviations of -62 ± 36% for COA and -50 ± 44% for 40%, radiomic features derived from the ground truth were strongly correlated and/or robust to 98 radiomic features derived from COA and to 102 from 40%.ConclusionIn multicenter studies, we recommend the analysis of EARL accreditation measurements in order to retrospectively identify the robust PET radiomic features. Furthermore, 4 radiomic features (area under the curve of the cumulative SUV volume histogram, skewness, kurtosis, and gray-level variance derived from GLRLM after application of an equal probability quantization algorithm on the voxels within lesion) were robust to all degrading factors. In addition, the feasibility of 40% and COA segmentations for their use in radiomics analysis has been demonstrated.

Project description:PurposeTo assess the contribution of a generative adversarial network (GAN) to improve intermanufacturer reproducibility of radiomic features (RFs).Materials and methodsThe authors retrospectively developed a cycle-GAN to translate texture information from chest radiographs acquired using one manufacturer (Siemens) to chest radiographs acquired using another (Philips), producing fake chest radiographs with different textures. The authors prospectively evaluated the ability of this texture-translation cycle-GAN to reduce the intermanufacturer variability of RFs extracted from the lung parenchyma. This study assessed the cycle-GAN's ability to fool several machine learning (ML) classifiers tasked with recognizing the manufacturer on the basis of chest radiography inputs. The authors also evaluated the cycle-GAN's ability to mislead radiologists who were asked to perform the same recognition task. Finally, the authors tested whether the cycle-GAN had an impact on radiomic diagnostic accuracy for chest radiography in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).ResultsRFs, extracted from chest radiographs after the cycle-GAN's texture translation (fake chest radiographs), showed decreased intermanufacturer RF variability. Using cycle-GAN-generated chest radiographs as inputs, ML classifiers categorized the fake chest radiographs as belonging to the target manufacturer rather than to a native one. Moreover, cycle-GAN fooled two experienced radiologists who identified fake chest radiographs as belonging to a target manufacturer class. Finally, reducing intermanufacturer RF variability with cycle-GAN improved the discriminative power of RFs for patients without CHF versus patients with CHF (from 55% to 73.5%, P < .001).ConclusionBoth ML classifiers and radiologists had difficulty recognizing the chest radiographs' manufacturer. The cycle-GAN improved RF intermanufacturer reproducibility and discriminative power for identifying patients with CHF. This deep learning approach may help counteract the sensitivity of RFs to differences in acquisition.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Alderson in this issue.

Dataset Information

The application of a workflow integrating the variable reproducibility and harmonizability of radiomic features on a phantom dataset.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets