Dataset Information

Xpert MTB/XDR: a 10-Color Reflex Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Settings To Detect Isoniazid, Fluoroquinolone, and Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance Directly from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Positive Sputum.

ABSTRACT: We describe the design, development, analytical performance, and a limited clinical evaluation of the 10-color Xpert MTB/XDR assay (CE-IVD only, not for sale in the United States). This assay is intended as a reflex test to detect resistance to isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), ethionamide (ETH), and second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs) in unprocessed sputum samples and concentrated sputum sediments which are positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis The Xpert MTB/XDR assay simultaneously amplifies eight genes and promoter regions in M. tuberculosis and analyzes melting temperatures (T_m s) using sloppy molecular beacon (SMB) probes to identify mutations associated with INH, FLQ, ETH, and SLID resistance. Results can be obtained in under 90 min using 10-color GeneXpert modules. The assay can differentiate low- versus high-level resistance to INH and FLQ as well as cross-resistance versus individual resistance to SLIDs by identifying mutation-specific T_m s or T_m patterns generated by the SMB probes. The assay has a limit of detection comparable to that of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay and successfully detected 16 clinically significant mutations in a challenge set of clinical isolate DNA. In a clinical study performed at two sites with 100 sputum and 214 clinical isolates, the assay showed a sensitivity of 94% to 100% and a specificity of 100% for all drugs except for ETH compared to that of sequencing. The sensitivity and specificity were in the same ranges as those of phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing. Used in combination with a primary tuberculosis diagnostic test, this assay should expand the capacity for detection of drug-resistant tuberculosis near the point of care.

SUBMITTER: Cao Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8106700 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/XDR for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in people with signs and symptoms of pulmonary tuberculosis. To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/XDR for resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and amikacin in people irrespective of rifampicin resistance and people with detected rifampicin resistance. In these populations, pulmonary tuberculosis will have been detected by Xpert MTB/XDR (as it is a reflex test). Such populations typically will have received prior testing verifying tuberculosis with another WHO‐approved test. Secondary objectives To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/XDR by direct testing versus indirect testing (whereby Xpert MTB/XDR is performed on a Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate grown from culture). To investigate the effects of potential sources of heterogeneity on test accuracy. For pulmonary tuberculosis, potential sources include HIV status, smear status, history of tuberculosis, treatment status (no treatment or currently on treatment), and treatment response status (culture conversion, yes or no). For drug resistance, potential sources include the type of reference standard and history of tuberculosis treatment. In addition, for fluoroquinolone resistance, a potential source of heterogeneity is the specific drug (e.g. ofloxacin or moxifloxacin) used in the phenotypic culture‐based DST (pDST) reference standard. We will also consider whether the WHO‐recommended critical drug concentration was used for the pDST reference standard (WHO Critical Concentrations 2018; WHO Critical Concentrations 2021). Regarding previously treated people, these investigations are important questions for clinical practice. For tuberculosis detection, studies have highlighted the challenges in interpreting Xpert MTB/RIF‐positive and Xpert Ultra‐positive results in previously treated people (Mishra 2020; Theron 2016a). As mentioned, for detection of drug resistance, previous treatment may increase the likelihood of having drug resistance.

Project description:BackgroundClinical tuberculosis diagnosis and empiric treatment have traditionally been common among patients with negative bacteriologic test results. Increasing availability of rapid molecular diagnostic tests, including Xpert MTB/RIF and the new Xpert Ultra cartridge, may alter the role of empiric treatment.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled outpatients age > = 15 who were evaluated for pulmonary tuberculosis at three health facilities in Kampala, Uganda. Using sputum mycobacterial culture, interviews, and clinical record abstraction, we estimated the accuracy of clinical diagnosis relative to Xpert and sputum culture and assessed the contribution of clinical diagnosis to case detection.ResultsOver a period of 9 months, 99 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis and subsequently completed sputum culture; they were matched to 196 patients receiving negative tuberculosis evaluations in the same facilities. Xpert was included in the evaluation of 291 (99%) patients. Compared to culture, Xpert had a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval 83-97%) and specificity of 95% (92-98%). Twenty patients with negative Xpert were clinically diagnosed with tuberculosis and subsequently had their culture status determined; two (10%) were culture-positive. Considering all treated patients regardless of Xpert and culture data completeness, and considering treatment initiations before a positive Xpert (N = 4) to be empiric, 26/101 (26%) tuberculosis treatment courses were started empirically. Compared to sputum smear- or Xpert-positive patients with positive cultures, empirically-treated, Xpert-negative patients with negative cultures had higher prevalence of HIV (67% versus 37%), shorter duration of cough (median 4 versus 8 weeks), and lower inflammatory markers (median CRP 7 versus 101 mg/L).ConclusionJudged against sputum culture in a routine care setting of high HIV prevalence, the accuracy of Xpert was high. Clinical judgment identified a small number of additional culture-positive cases, but with poor specificity. Although clinicians should continue to prescribe tuberculosis treatment for Xpert-negative patients whose clinical presentations strongly suggest pulmonary tuberculosis, they should also carefully consider alternative diagnoses.

Project description:The new molecular assay Xpert MTB/XDR (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was launched in 2021 to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MT) complex with mutations conferring resistance to isoniazid (INH), ethionamide (ETH), fluoroquinolone (FQ), and second-line injectable drugs (SLIDs). The aim of our study was to evaluate the performance of the Xpert MTB/XDR rapid molecular assay on rifampicin-resistant, multidrug-resistant, and pre-extensively resistant tuberculosis (TB) isolates in a clinical laboratory in the Balkan Peninsula compared to a phenotypic drug susceptibility test (pDST). Xpert MTB/XDR was used to test positive Bactec MGIT 960 (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) cultures or DNA isolates. In the case of discrepant results between Xpert MTB/XDR and pDST, the usefulness of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was emphasized. In our study, 80 MT isolates from different Balkan countries were selectively chosen from the National Mycobacterial Strain Collection in Golnik, Slovenia. Isolates were tested with the Xpert MTB/XDR assay, conventional pDST, and WGS. Xpert MTB/XDR showed high sensitivities of 91.9%, 100%, and 100% for detecting INH, FQ, and SLID resistance, respectively, compared to pDST. In contrast, low sensitivity (51.9%) for ETH resistance was achieved because isolates harbored widespread mutations across the ethA gene. The specificity of Xpert MTB/XDR was 100% for all drugs except for INH (66.7%). Further investigation with WGS revealed -57c→t mutations in the oxyR-ahpC region marked with uncertain significance, which caused the low specificity for detecting INH resistance with the new assay. Xpert MTB/XDR can be used in clinical laboratories for the rapid detection of INH, FQ, and SLID resistance. Moreover, it can be used to rule in resistance to ETH. Additional use of WGS is recommended in cases of discrepant results between pDST and Xpert MTB/XDR. Future improvements of Xpert MTB/XDR with the inclusion of additional genes may increase the usefulness of the assay. IMPORTANCE The Xpert MTB/XDR was tested on drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates from the Balkan Peninsula. Positive Bactec MGIT 960 cultures or DNA isolates were tested as starting material. According to the results of our study with Xpert MTB/XDR, sensitivities for the detection of SLID, FQ, and INH resistance were sufficient (>90%) for the assay to be implemented into diagnostic algorithms. In our study, WGS revealed lesser-known mutations in genes conferring INH and ETH resistance, and their impact on resistance is still unknown. Mutations in the ethA gene causing resistance to ETH were scattered along structural gene without high-confidence markers for resistance. Therefore, resistance to ETH should be reported based on a combination of methods. Because the Xpert MTB/XDR assay was found to have good performance, we propose that it should be the method of choice for confirming resistance to INH, FQ, and SLID and conditionally for resistance to ETH.

Project description:IntroductionWorldwide, COVID-19 pandemic lead to a large fall in the number of newly reported TB cases. In sub-Saharan Africa, microbiological diagnosis of TB is generally based on smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF on sputum samples, but good quality sputum samples are often difficult to obtain, leading clinicians to rely on more invasive procedures for diagnosis. Aim of this study was to investigate pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF on stool samples compared to respiratory microbiological reference standards in African countries.MethodsFour investigators independently searched PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science until 12th October 2022, then screened titles and abstracts of all potentially eligible articles. The authors applied the eligibility criteria, considered the full texts. All the studies reported the data regarding true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed with the Quadas-2 tool.Resultsoverall, among 130 papers initially screened, we evaluated 47 works, finally including 13 papers for a total of 2,352 participants, mainly children. The mean percentage of females was 49.6%, whilst the mean percentage of patients reporting HIV was 27.7%. Pooled sensitivity for Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis was 68.2% (95%CI: 61.1-74.7%) even if characterized by a high heterogeneity (I2=53.7%). Specificity was almost 100% (99%, 95%CI: 97-100%; I2 = 45.7%). When divided for reference standard, in the six studies using sputum and nasogastric aspirate the accuracy was optimal (AUC = 0.99, SE = 0.02), whilst in the studies using only sputum for tuberculosis detection the AUC was 0.85 (with a SE = 0.16). The most common source of bias was exclusion of enrolled patients in the analysis.ConclusionsOur study confirms that, in Africa, stool Xpert MTB/RIF may be a useful rule-in test for children above and below 5 years of age under evaluation for pulmonary tuberculosis. Sensitivity increased substantially when using both sputum and nasogastric aspirate as reference samples.

Dataset Information

Xpert MTB/XDR: a 10-Color Reflex Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Settings To Detect Isoniazid, Fluoroquinolone, and Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance Directly from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Positive Sputum.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets