Dataset Information

Tumor Suppressor Effect of RBMS3 in Breast Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

RBMS3 (RNA-binding motif, single-stranded-intervacting protein 3) acts as a tumor-suppressive gene in a number of human cancers, however, its role in breast cancer is not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the expression and clinicopathological significance of RBMS3 in breast cancer.

Methods

A total of 998 breast cancer tissue samples in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database with survival outcomes were divided into high RBMS3 expression and low expression groups using the median as the cutoff. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

TCGA showed that RBMS3 mRNA was downregulated in breast cancer tissues, and RBMS3 downregulation was correlated with poor prognosis. Immunohistochemistry staining of 127 paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues showed that RBMS3 protein was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus; however, nuclear staining was present in 90.0% of normal breast tissues but only 28.3% of breast cancer tissues. Decreased RBMS3 protein expression was significantly correlated with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative status and death at final follow-up. Patients with lower RBMS3 protein expression had substantially shorter survival than those with higher RBMS3 expression. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated that the combination of RBMS3 expression and ER status (a variable designated as "cofactor") was an independent prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.420, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.223-0.791, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

RBMS3 downregulation was correlated with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients, and the combination of RBMS3 expression and ER status was an independent prognostic factor.

SUBMITTER: Wang C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8107673 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The landscape and biological functions of tumor suppressor long noncoding RNAs in breast cancer are still unknown. METHODS:Data from whole transcriptome sequencing of 33 breast specimens in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Center cohort and The Cancer Genome Atlas was applied to identify and validate the landscape of tumor suppressor long noncoding RNAs, which was further validated by The Cancer Genome Atlas pancancer data including 33 cancer types and 12,839 patients. Next, the expression model, prognostic roles, potential biological functions and epigenetic regulation of tumor suppressor long noncoding RNAs were investigated and validated in the breast cancer and pancancer cohorts. Finally, EPB41L4A-AS2 was selected to validate our novel finding, and the tumor suppressive roles of EPB41L4A-AS2 in breast cancer were examined. RESULTS:We identified and validated the landscape of tumor suppressor long noncoding RNAs in breast cancer. The expression of the identified long noncoding RNAs was downregulated in cancer tissue samples compared with normal tissue samples, and these long noncoding RNAs correlated with a favorable prognosis in breast cancer patients and the patients in the pancancer cohort. Multiple carcinogenesis-associated biological functions were predicted to be regulated negatively by these long noncoding RNAs. Moreover, these long noncoding RNAs were transcriptionally regulated by epigenetic modification, including DNA methylation and histone methylation modification. Finally, EPB41L4A-AS2 inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion and induced cell apoptosis in vitro. Mechanistically, EPB41L4A-AS2, acting at least in part as a tumor suppressor, upregulated tumor suppressor gene expression. Moreover, ZNF217 recruited EZH2 to the EPB41L4A-AS2 locus and suppressed the expression of EPB41L4A-AS2 by epigenetically increasing H3K27me3 enrichment. CONCLUSIONS:This work enlarges the functional landscape of known long noncoding RNAs in human cancer and provides novel insights into the suppressive roles of these long noncoding RNAs.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Inhibitor of differentiation protein 4 (ID4) is a dominant negative regulator of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family of transcription factors. During tumorigenesis, ID4 may act as a tumor suppressor or as an oncogene in different tumor types. However, the role of ID4 in breast cancer is not clear where both an oncogenic and a tumor suppressor function have been attributed. Here, we hypothesize that ID4 behaves as both, but its role in breast differs according to the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the tumor. METHODS:ID4 expression was retrieved from TCGA database using UCSC Xena. Association between overall survival (OS) and ID4 was assessed using Kaplan-Meier plotter. Correlation between methylation and expression was analyzed using the MEXPRESS tool. In vitro experiments involved ectopic expression of ID4 in MCF-7, T47D, and MDA-MB231 breast cancer cell lines. Migration and colony formation capacity were assessed after transfection treatments. Gene expression was analyzed by ddPCR and methylation by MSP, MS-MLPA, or ddMSP. RESULTS:Data mining analysis revealed that ID4 expression is significantly lower in ER+ tumors with respect to ER- tumors or normal tissue. We also demonstrate that ID4 is significantly methylated in ER+ tumors. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that low ID4 expression levels were associated with poor overall survival in patients with ER+ tumors. In silico expression analysis indicated that ID4 was associated with the expression of key genes of the ER pathway only in ER+ tumors. In vitro experiments revealed that ID4 overexpression in ER+ cell lines resulted in decreased migration capacity and reduced number of colonies. ID4 overexpression induced a reduction in ER levels in ER+ cell lines, while estrogen deprivation with fulvestrant did not induce changes neither in ID4 methylation nor in ID4 expression. CONCLUSIONS:We propose that ID4 is frequently silenced by promoter methylation in ER+ breast cancers and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in these tumors, probably due to its interaction with key genes of the ER pathway. Our present study contributes to the knowledge of the role of ID4 in breast cancer.