Dataset Information

Safety and Efficacy of Physical Thermal Ablation Combined Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

To compare the efficacy and safety of physical thermal ablation (PTA), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), combined with sorafenib and physical thermal ablation alone for the control and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the available literature.

Methods

Comprehensive searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, CNKI, the Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Database (known as CBM), Weipu Journal, and Wanfang Database. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 15 studies, consisting of 2,227 HCC patients, were selected and included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the RFA-alone group, the patients in the RFA+sorafenib group had longer 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (all p<0.05), better overall efficacy (p<0.0001), longer radiofrequency interval (p<0.001), and lower 2-year recurrence rate (p=0.02). The 1-year overall survival (p=0.003) and overall efficacy (p=0.002) of the MWA+sorafenib group were also higher than those of the MWA-alone group. The incidences of adverse reactions in the RFA+sorafenib group, such as hand-foot skin reactions (p<0.001), diarrhea and constipation (p=0.0001), hypertension (p=0.009), and alopecia (p<0.001), were significantly higher than those in the RFA-alone group.

Conclusions

RFA or MWA combined with sorafenib has produced a better therapeutic effect on HCC than physical thermal ablation alone; however, adverse reactions have been obvious. It is necessary to evaluate the safety of combination therapy, and pay close attention to the adverse reactions that develop in patients.

SUBMITTER: Jin M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8111114 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors. Surgical resection is often only possible in the early stages of HCC and among those with limited cirrhosis. Radiofrequency ablation and Microwave ablation are 2 main types of percutaneous thermal ablation for the treatment of HCC. The efficacy and safety between these 2 therapy methods are still under a debate.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency ablation and Microwave ablation in treating HCC.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane databases and Web of Science were systematically searched. We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing the efficacy and safety of Radiofrequency ablation and Microwave ablation in HCC patients. Outcome measures on local tumor progression, complete ablation, disease-free survival, overall survival, or major complications were compared between the 2 groups. The random effect model was used when there was significant heterogeneity between studies, otherwise the fixed effect model was used.ResultsA total of 33 studies, involving a total of 4589 patients were identified, which included studies comprised 7 RCTs, 24 retrospective observational trials, and 2 prospective observational trial. Microwave ablation had a lower local tumor progression than Radiofrequency ablation in cohort studies (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.96, P = .02). Complete ablation rate of Microwave ablation was higher than that of Radiofrequency ablation in cohort studies (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.05-2.25, P = .03). There was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the main complications between Microwave ablation and Radiofrequency ablation.ConclusionsMicrowave ablation has higher complete ablation and lower local tumor progression than Radiofrequency ablation in the ablation treatment of HCC nodules. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the 2 therapy methods.

Project description:Background To evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of cervical metastatic lymph nodes (CMLNs) of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Methods The Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies on the safety and efficacy of thermal ablations (RFA, MWA, and LA) for the treatment of CMLNs of PTC until March 30, 2022. A review of 334 potential papers identified 17 eligible papers including 312 patients. Fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to evaluate the pooled proportions of volume reduction rate (VRR), complete disappearance, and recurrence, and pooled estimates of changes in the largest diameter, volume, and serum Tg after ablation. The pooled proportions of overall and major complications were calculated. Subgroup analysis based on treatment modalities. The heterogeneity among studies was analyzed by using Q statistics and inconsistency index I2. MINORS scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Results 17 eligible studies were finally identified, including 312 patients and 559 CMLNs. The pooled proportions of VRR, complete disappearance and recurrence of CMLNs were 91.28% [95% confidence interval (CI): 86.60-95.97%], 67.9% [95% CI: 53.1-81.1%] and 7.8% [95%CI: 3.0-14.1%], respectively. The pooled estimates of changes in the largest diameter, volume and serum Tg were 8.12 mm [95%CI: 6.78-9.46 mm], 338.75 mm3 [95%CI: 206.85 -470.65 mm3] and 5.96 ng/ml [95%CI: 3.68-8.24 ng/ml], respectively. The pooled proportions of overall and major complications were 2.9% [95%CI: 0.3-7.1%] and 0.3% [95%CI: 0-1.9%], respectively. Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed for complete disappearance (P<0.01, I2 =88.6%), VRR (P<0.001, I2 =99.9%), recurrence (P=0.02, I2 =47.76%), overall complications (P<0.02, I2 =44.8%), and changes in the largest diameter (P < 0.001, I2 =82.6%), volume (P<0.001, I2 =97.0%), and serum Tg (P < 0.001, I2 =93.7%). Subgroup analysis showed heterogeneity of the VRR among the treatment modality (I2 range: 84.4-100%). The VRR of MWA was the highest (97.97%), followed by RFA (95.57%) and LA (84.46%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion All thermal ablations were safe and effective for the treatment of CMLNs of PTC. However, each treatment had significant heterogeneity in VRR. Compared with RFA and MWA, LA was less effective in reducing the volume of CMLNs of PTC.