Dataset Information

MRI-Based Radiomics to Differentiate between Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors With External Validation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The differentiation between benign and malignant parotid lesions is crucial to defining the treatment plan, which highly depends on the tumor histology. We aimed to evaluate the role of MRI-based radiomics using both T2-weighted (T2-w) images and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps in the differentiation of parotid lesions, in order to develop predictive models with an external validation cohort.

Materials and methods

A sample of 69 untreated parotid lesions was evaluated retrospectively, including 37 benign (of which 13 were Warthin's tumors) and 32 malignant tumors. The patient population was divided into three groups: benign lesions (24 cases), Warthin's lesions (13 cases), and malignant lesions (32 cases), which were compared in pairs. First- and second-order features were derived for each lesion. Margins and contrast enhancement patterns (CE) were qualitatively assessed. The model with the final feature set was achieved using the support vector machine binary classification algorithm.

Results

Models for discriminating between Warthin's and malignant tumors, benign and Warthin's tumors and benign and malignant tumors had an accuracy of 86.7%, 91.9% and 80.4%, respectively. After the feature selection process, four parameters for each model were used, including histogram-based features from ADC and T2-w images, shape-based features and types of margins and/or CE. Comparable accuracies were obtained after validation with the external cohort.

Conclusions

Radiomic analysis of ADC, T2-w images, and qualitative scores evaluating margins and CE allowed us to obtain good to excellent diagnostic accuracies in differentiating parotid lesions, which were confirmed with an external validation cohort.

SUBMITTER: Piludu F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8111169 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the value of machine learning models based on clinical-radiological features and multiphasic CT radiomics features in the differentiation of benign parotid tumors (BPTs) and malignant parotid tumors (MPTs).MethodsThis retrospective study included 312 patients (205 cases of BPTs and 107 cases of MPTs) who underwent multiphasic enhanced CT examinations, which were randomly divided into training (N = 218) and test (N = 94) sets. The radiomics features were extracted from the plain, arterial, and venous phases. The synthetic minority oversampling technique was used to balance minority class samples in the training set. Feature selection methods were done using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), mutual information (MI), and recursive feature extraction (RFE). Two machine learning classifiers, support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR), were then combined in pairs with three feature selection methods to build different radiomics models. Meanwhile, the prediction performances of different radiomics models based on single phase (plain, arterial, and venous phase) and multiphase (three-phase combination) were compared to determine which model construction method and phase were more discriminative. In addition, clinical models based on clinical-radiological features and combined models integrating radiomics features and clinical-radiological features were established. The prediction performances of the different models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the drawing of calibration curves.ResultsAmong the 24 established radiomics models composed of four different phases, three feature selection methods, and two machine learning classifiers, the LASSO-SVM model based on a three-phase combination had the optimal prediction performance with AUC (0.936 [95% CI = 0.866, 0.976]), sensitivity (0.78), specificity (0.90), and accuracy (0.86) in the test set, and its prediction performance was significantly better than with the clinical model based on LR (AUC = 0.781, p = 0.012). In the test set, the combined model based on LR had a lower AUC than the optimal radiomics model (AUC = 0.933 vs. 0.936), but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.888).ConclusionMultiphasic CT-based radiomics analysis showed a machine learning model based on clinical-radiological features and radiomics features has the potential to provide a valuable tool for discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate an integrated prediction model based on clinicoradiological data and computed tomography (CT)-radiomics for differentiating between benign and malignant parotid gland (PG) tumors via multicentre cohorts.Materials and methodsA cohort of 87 PG tumor patients from hospital #1 who were diagnosed between January 2017 and January 2020 were used for prediction model training. A total of 378 radiomic features were extracted from a single tumor region of interest (ROI) of each patient on each phase of CT images. Imaging features were extracted from plain CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images. After dimensionality reduction, a radiomics signature was constructed. A combination model was constructed by incorporating the rad-score and CT radiological features. An independent group of 38 patients from hospital #2 was used to validate the prediction models. The model performances were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the models. The radiomics signature model was constructed and the rad-score was calculated based on selected imaging features from plain CT and CECT images.ResultsAnalysis of variance and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that location, lymph node metastases, and rad-score were independent predictors of tumor malignant status. The ROC curves showed that the accuracy of the support vector machine (SVM)-based prediction model, radiomics signature, location and lymph node status in the training set was 0.854, 0.772, 0.679, and 0.632, respectively; specificity was 0.869, 0.878, 0.734, and 0.773; and sensitivity was 0.731, 0.808, 0.723, and 0.742. In the test set, the accuracy was 0.835, 0.771, 0.653, and 0.608, respectively; the specificity was 0.741, 0.889, 0.852, and 0.812; and the sensitivity was 0.818, 0.790, 0.731, and 0.716.ConclusionsThe combination model based on the radiomics signature and CT radiological features is capable of evaluating the malignancy of PG tumors and can help clinicians guide clinical tumor management.

Project description:BackgroundEarly diagnosis is crucial to the treatment of breast cancer, but conventional imaging detection is challenging. Radiomics has the potential to improve early diagnostic efficacy in a noninvasive manner. This study examined whether integrating computed tomography (CT) radiomics information based on ultrasound (US) models can improve the efficacy of breast cancer prediction.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 420 patients with pathologically confirmed benign or malignant breast tumors. Clinical data and examination images were collected, and the population was divided into training (n=294) and validation (n=126) groups at a ratio of 7:3. The region of interest (ROI) was manually segmented along the tumor boundary using MaZda software, and the features of each ROI was extracted. After dimension reduction and screening, the best features were retained. Subsequently, random forest (RF), support vector machines, and K-nearest neighbor classifiers were used to establish prediction models in an US and combined-methods group.ResultsFinally, 8 of the 379 features were retained in the US group. Random forest was found to be the best model, and the area under the curve (AUC) of the training and validation groups was 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.852-0.942] and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.775-0.930), respectively. Meanwhile, 12 of the 750 features were retained in the combined group. In this regard, random forest proved to be the best model, and the AUC of the training and validation group was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.918-0.981) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.866-0.969), respectively. The calibration curve showed a good fit of the model. The decision curve showed that the clinical net benefit of the combined group was far greater than that of any single examination, and the prediction model of the combined group exhibited a degree of practical clinical value.ConclusionsThe combined model based on US and CT images has potential application value in the prognostic prediction of benign and malignant breast diseases.