Dataset Information

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation in the era of COVID-19: a follow-up study from a tertiary referral center in Iran.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric transplant outcomes and determine whether to continue pediatric transplant activity or not, and how policies intended our center has been effective in preventing COVID-19 among organ transplant recipients.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of hospitalized pediatrics after organ transplantation at Shiraz transplant center since March to August 2020. All liver and kidney transplanted children were included the study and their laboratory and clinical related COVID-19 characteristics were followed up till 3 months after transplantation during hospitalization period and then weekly by the transplant committee.

Results

Fifty-one patients underwent transplantation including 11 kidney and 40 liver recipients. The mean age of the pediatric cases was 6.72 ± 5.47 years. A total of 11 patients died due to post-transplant complications, while none of the patients presented any sign or symptoms in favor of COVID-19 in the hospital course after transplantation. Six transplants including 2 kidney and 4 liver were canceled when positive PCR tests were detected in their donors before the surgery. In the 3 months of follow up, two patients presented with symptoms including high grade fever, malaise, rhinorrhea, and GI symptoms. Both patients had two negative PCR, and no radiologic or laboratory results regarding COVID-19 were also detected. One had positive influenza PCR, while the second one had a positive serologic test for EBV; CT, computed tomography CONCLUSION: Transplant programs could continue their activities during the COVID-19 pandemic with specific case selection, accurate screening methods and following protective protocols.

SUBMITTER: Shafiekhani M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8112472 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe cancer incidence, types, and risk factors after pediatric kidney transplantation (KT) have been reported in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. However, no information is available about cancer in pediatric KT recipients in Asian countries.MethodsChildren aged <20 y who underwent initial KT from 1983 to 2016 were analyzed. We compared the cancer incidence with that in the general Japanese population using standardized incidence ratio and examined posttransplant cancer risk using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 356 children (median age, 11.7 y; interquartile range, 5.0-17.6) received KT with a follow-up period of 4466 person-years. The median age of cancer onset was 18.5 y (interquartile range, 8.0-32.3), and 13 cancers occurred in 12 patients (3.4%). Two patients died from cancer. The most common cancers were posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) (38.5%). The median time to PTLD and non-PTLD diagnosis after KT was 0.6 and 16.4 y, respectively. There was no occurrence of skin cancer. The posttransplant cancer incidence was 9.9 times higher than that in the general age-matched population (standardized incidence ratio = 9.9; 95% confidence interval, 4.80-18.39). The cumulative cancer incidence was 5.3% in 20 y after KT, which is lower than that reported in previous studies. We could not identify any risk factors for all cancer after KT in all patients, whereas subgroup analysis in 264 patients with available data of recipient Epstein-Barr virus serological status showed that recipient Epstein-Barr virus-negative serology was an independent risk factor for cancer development.ConclusionsThe incidence of cancer is higher in Japanese pediatric KT recipients than in the general population. The cumulative incidence of cancer after KT was lower in our population than that previously reported. This may be because there was no skin cancer observed in the Japanese pediatric KT recipients in our study.

Project description:Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) is a web-based asynchronous electronic communication service that allows primary-care- practitioners (PCPs) to submit "elective" clinical questions to a specialist. For adults, PCPs have reported improved access and timeliness to specialist advice, averted face-to-face specialist referrals in up to 40% of cases and high provider satisfaction.To determine whether the expansion of eConsult to a pediatric setting would result in similar measures of improved healthcare system process and high provider acceptance reported in adults.Prospective observational cohort study.Single Canadian tertiary-care academic pediatric hospital (June 2014-16) servicing 1.2 million people.1. PCPs already using eConsult. 2.Volunteer pediatric specialists provided services in addition to their regular workload. 3.Pediatric patients (< 18 years-old) referred for none-acute care conditions.Specialty service utilization and access, impact on PCP course-of-action and referral-patterns and survey-based provider satisfaction data were collected.1064 eConsult requests from 367 PCPs were answered by 23 pediatric specialists representing 14 specialty-services. The top three specialties represented were: General Pediatrics 393 cases (36.9%), Orthopedics 162 (15.2%) and Psychiatry 123 (11.6%). Median specialist response time was 0.9 days (range <1 hour-27 days), most consults (63.2%) required <10minutes to complete and 21/21(100%) specialist survey-respondents reported minimal workload burden. For 515/1064(48.4%) referrals, PCPs received advice for a new or additional course of action; 391/1064(36.7%) referrals resulted in an averted face-to-face specialist visit. In 9 specialties with complete data, the median wait-time was significantly less (p<0.001) for an eConsult (1 day, 95%CI:0.9-1.2) compared with a face-to-face referral (132 days; 95%CI:127-136). The majority (>93.3%) of PCPs rated eConsult as very good/excellent value for both patients and themselves. All specialist survey-respondents indicated eConsult should be a continued service.Similar to adults, eConsult improves PCP access and timeliness to elective pediatric specialist advice and influences their care decisions, while reporting high end-user satisfaction. Further study is warranted to assess impact on resource utilization and clinical outcomes.