Dataset Information

Effect of a Digital Intervention on Depressive Symptoms in Patients With Comorbid Hypertension or Diabetes in Brazil and Peru: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Depression is a leading contributor to disease burden globally. Digital mental health interventions can address the treatment gap in low- and middle-income countries, but the effectiveness in these countries is unknown.

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of a digital intervention in reducing depressive symptoms among people with diabetes and/or hypertension.

Design, setting, and participants

Participants with clinically significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥10) who were being treated for hypertension and/or diabetes were enrolled in a cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) at 20 sites in São Paulo, Brazil (N=880; from September 2016 to September 2017; final follow-up, April 2018), and in an individual-level RCT at 7 sites in Lima, Peru (N=432; from January 2017 to September 2017; final follow-up, March 2018).

Interventions

An 18-session, low-intensity, digital intervention was delivered over 6 weeks via a provided smartphone, based on behavioral activation principles, and supported by nurse assistants (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 217 participants in Lima) vs enhanced usual care (n = 440 participants in 10 clusters in São Paulo; n = 215 participants in Lima).

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome was a reduction of at least 50% from baseline in PHQ-9 scores (range, 0-27; higher score indicates more severe depression) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included a reduction of at least 50% from baseline PHQ-9 scores at 6 months.

Results

Among 880 patients cluster randomized in Brazil (mean age, 56.0 years; 761 [86.5%] women) and 432 patients individually randomized in Peru (mean age, 59.7 years; 352 [81.5%] women), 807 (91.7%) in Brazil and 426 (98.6%) in Peru completed at least 1 follow-up assessment. The proportion of participants in São Paulo with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 40.7% (159/391 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 28.6% (114/399 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 12.1 percentage points [95% CI, 5.5 to 18.7]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2]; P = .001). In Lima, the proportion of participants with a reduction in PHQ-9 score of at least 50% at 3-month follow-up was 52.7% (108/205 participants) in the digital intervention group vs 34.1% (70/205 participants) in the enhanced usual care group (difference, 18.6 percentage points [95% CI, 9.1 to 28.0]; adjusted OR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.4 to 3.2]; P < .001). At 6-month follow-up, differences across groups were no longer statistically significant.

Conclusions and relevance

In 2 RCTs of patients with hypertension or diabetes and depressive symptoms in Brazil and Peru, a digital intervention delivered over a 6-week period significantly improved depressive symptoms at 3 months when compared with enhanced usual care. However, the magnitude of the effect was small in the trial from Brazil and the effects were not sustained at 6 months.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02846662 (São Paulo) and NCT03026426 (Lima).

SUBMITTER: Araya R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8114139 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDepression is one of the most prevalent mental disorders and a leading cause of disability, disproportionately affecting specific groups, such as patients with noncommunicable diseases. Over the past decade, digital interventions have been developed to provide treatment for these patients. CONEMO (Emotional Control in Spanish) is an 18-session psychoeducational digital intervention delivered through a smartphone app and minimally supported by a nurse. CONEMO demonstrated effectiveness in reducing depressive symptoms through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) among patients with diabetes, hypertension, or both, in Lima, Peru. However, in addition to clinical outcomes, it is important to explore users' experiences, satisfaction, and perceptions of usability and acceptability, which can affect their engagement with the intervention.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the RCT participants' experiences with CONEMO in Peru, complemented with information provided by the nurses who monitored them.MethodsIn 2018, semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of 29 (13.4%) patients from the 217 patients who participated in the CONEMO intervention in Peru and the 3 hired nurses who supported its delivery. Interviewees were selected at random based on their adherence to the digital intervention (0-5, 10-14, and 15-18 sessions completed), to include different points of view. Content analysis was conducted to analyze the interviews.ResultsParticipants' mean age was 64.4 (SD 8.5) years, and 79% (23/29) of them were women. Most of the interviewed participants (21/29, 72%) stated that CONEMO fulfilled their expectations and identified positive changes in their physical and mental health after using it. Some of these improvements were related to their thoughts and feelings (eg, think differently, be more optimistic, and feel calmer), whereas others were related to their routines (eg, go out more and improve health-related habits). Most participants (19/29, 66%) reported not having previous experience with using smartphones, and despite experiencing some initial difficulties, they managed to use CONEMO. The most valued features of the app were the videos and activities proposed for the participant to perform. Most participants (27/29, 93%) had a good opinion about the study nurses and reported feeling supported by them. A few participants provided suggestions to improve the intervention, which included adding more videos, making the sessions' text simple, extending the length of the intervention, and improving the training session with long explanations.ConclusionsThe findings of this qualitative study provide further support and contextualize the positive results found in the CONEMO RCT, including insights into the key features that made the intervention effective and engaging. The participants' experience with the smartphone and CONEMO app reveal that it is feasible to be used by people with little knowledge of technology. In addition, the study identified suggestions to improve the CONEMO intervention for its future scale-up.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03026426; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03026426.

Project description:BackgroundMobile health interventions provide significant strategies for improving access to health services, offering a potential solution to reduce the mental health treatment gap. Economic evaluation of this intervention is needed to help inform local mental health policy and program development.ObjectiveThis paper presents the protocol for an economic evaluation conducted alongside 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a psychological intervention delivered through a technological platform (CONEMO) to treat depressive symptoms in people with diabetes, hypertension, or both.MethodsThe economic evaluation uses a within-trial analysis to evaluate the incremental costs and health outcomes of CONEMO plus enhanced usual care in comparison with enhanced usual care from public health care system and societal perspectives. Participants are patients of the public health care services for hypertension, diabetes, or both conditions in São Paulo, Brazil (n=880) and Lima, Peru (n=432). Clinical effectiveness will be measured by reduction in depressive symptoms and gains in health-related quality of life. We will conduct cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, providing estimates of the cost per at least 50% reduction in 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores, and cost per quality-adjusted life year gained. The measurement of clinical effectiveness and resource use will take place over baseline, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up in the intervention and control groups. We will use a mixed costing methodology (ie, a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches) considering 4 cost categories: intervention (CONEMO related) costs, health care costs, patient and family costs, and productivity costs. We will collect unit costs from the RCTs and national administrative databases. The multinational economic evaluations will be fully split analyses with a multicountry costing approach. We will calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and present 95% CIs from nonparametric bootstrapping (1000 replicates). We will perform deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Finally, we will present cost-effectiveness acceptability curves to compare a range of possible cost-effectiveness thresholds.ResultsThe economic evaluation project had its project charter in June 2018 and is expected to be completed in September 2021. The final results will be available in the second half of 2021.ConclusionsWe expect to assess whether CONEMO plus enhanced usual care is a cost-effective strategy to improve depressive symptoms in this population compared with enhanced usual care. This study will contribute to the evidence base for health managers and policy makers in allocating additional resources for mental health initiatives. It also will provide a basis for further research on how this emerging technology and enhanced usual care can improve mental health and well-being in low- and middle-income countries.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT12345678 (Brazil) and NCT03026426 (Peru); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02846662 and https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03026426.International registered report identifier (irrid)DERR1-10.2196/26164.

Project description:BackgroundChronic pain and depression are common comorbid conditions, but there is limited evidence-based guidance for management of the two conditions together. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of chronic pain randomized controlled trials that collect depression outcomes, but it is unknown how often these trials include people with depression or significant depressive symptoms. If trials do not include participants representative of real-world populations, evidence and guidance generated from these trials risk being inapplicable for large proportions of the target population, or worse, risk harm. Thus, in order to identify pathways to improve the conduct of clinical trials, the aims of this study were to (1) estimate the proportion of randomized controlled trials evaluating chronic pain interventions and reporting depression outcomes that include participants with significant depressive symptoms; and (2) assess the variability of inclusion proportions by pain type, intervention type, gender, country of origin, and publication year.MethodsStudies were extracted from an umbrella review of interventions for chronic pain that reported depression outcomes. Screening and data extraction were completed in duplicate and conflicts were resolved by a third author. Randomized controlled trials with at least 50% adult participants and validated depression scales were included, and randomized controlled trials with populations whose mean scores were at or above depression thresholds at baseline were considered to have included participants with depression.ResultsOf the 346 randomized controlled trials analyzed, 142 (41%) included participants with depression. Eight pain-type groups and nine intervention types were identified. Randomized controlled trials investigating fibromyalgia and mixed chronic pain had the highest proportion of participants with depression, whereas studies of arthritis and axial pain had among the lowest. Randomized controlled trials from the United States had a significantly lower inclusion proportion compared with non-US studies, especially for studies on arthritis. The increase in inclusion proportion by publication year was driven by the increase in fibromyalgia studies.Discussion and conclusionThis study highlights opportunities to improve the conduct of chronic pain clinical trials. The majority of randomized controlled trials s analyzed evaluated participants without significant depressive symptoms at baseline, thus the findings synthesized in systematic reviews and subsequent guidelines are most applicable to the subset of real-world populations that do not have significant depressive symptoms. As well, systemic biases around psychological conditions and gender may be important contributors to differences in the study of depression in fibromyalgia compared with common conditions such as arthritis and axial pain. In order to better inform clinical practice, future research must intentionally include individuals with comorbid depression in trials of common chronic pain conditions, and consider methods to mitigate biases that may distort study design.

Project description:BackgroundDepression is common among adults who smoke cigarettes. Existing depression-specific cessation interventions have limited reach and are unlikely to improve smoking prevalence rates among this large subgroup of smokers.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether a mobile app-based intervention tailored for depression paired with a mailed sample of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) is efficacious for treating depression and promoting smoking cessation.MethodsA 2-arm nationwide remote randomized clinical trial was conducted in the United States. Adults (N=150) with elevated depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8≥10) who smoked were enrolled. The mobile app ("Goal2Quit") provided behavioral strategies for treating depression and quitting smoking based on Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression. Goal2Quit participants also received a 2-week sample of combination NRT. Treatment as usual participants received a self-help booklet for quitting smoking that was not tailored for depression. Primary end points included Goal2Quit usability, change in depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II) across 12 weeks, and smoking cessation including reduction in cigarettes per day, incidence of 24-hour quit attempts, floating abstinence, and 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA).ResultsIn total, 150 participants were enrolled between June 25, 2020, and February 23, 2022, of which 80 were female (53.3%) and the mean age was 38.4 (SD 10.3) years. At baseline, participants on average reported moderate depressive symptoms and smoked a mean of 14.7 (SD 7.5) cigarettes per day. Goal2Quit usability was strong with a mean usability rating on the System Usability Scale of 78.5 (SD 16.9), with 70% scoring above the ≥68 cutoff for above-average usability. Retention data for app use were generally strong immediately following trial enrollment and declined in subsequent weeks. Those who received Goal2Quit and the NRT sample reported lower mean depressive symptoms over the trial duration as compared to treatment as usual (difference of mean 3.72, SE 1.37 points less; P=.01). Across time points, all cessation outcomes favored Goal2Quit. Regarding abstinence, Goal2Quit participants reported significantly higher rates of 7-day PPA at weeks 4 (11% vs 0%; P=.02), 8 (7-day PPA: 12% vs 0%; P=.02), and 12 (16% vs 2%; P=.02).ConclusionsA mobile app intervention tailored for depression paired with a sample of NRT was effective for depression treatment and smoking cessation. Findings support the utility of this intervention approach for addressing the currently unmet public health treatment need for tailored, scalable depression-specific cessation treatments.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03837379; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03837379.