Dataset Information

Prognostic Value of ctDNA Mutation in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of melanoma. However, whether ctDNA mutations can independently predict survival remains controversial. This meta-analysis assessed the prognostic value of the presence or change in ctDNA mutations in melanoma patients.

Methods

We identified studies from the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. We estimated the combined hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using either fixed-effect or random-effect models based on heterogeneity.

Results

Sixteen studies including 1,781 patients were included. Both baseline and posttreatment detectable ctDNA were associated with poor OS (baseline detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.64-2.36, P < 0.00001; baseline undetectable vs. detectable, pooled HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.11-0.36, P < 0.00001; posttreatment detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 2.36, 95% CI = 1.30-4.28, P=0.005). For PFS, baseline detectable ctDNA may be associated with adverse PFS (baseline detectable vs. undetectable, pooled HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.84-2.37, P=0.19; baseline undetectable vs. detectable, pooled HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.19-0.95, P=0.04) and baseline high ctDNA and increased ctDNA were significantly associated with adverse PFS (baseline high vs. low/undetectable, pooled HR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.73-6.25, P=0.0003; increase vs. decrease, pooled HR = 4.48, 95% CI = 2.45-8.17, P < 0.00001). The baseline BRAF^V600 ctDNA mutation-positive group was significantly associated with adverse OS compared with the baseline ctDNA-negative group (pooled HR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.58-2.29, P < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in PFS between the baseline BRAF^V600 ctDNA mutation-detectable group and the undetectable group (pooled HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.72-1.44, P=0.92).

Conclusion

The presence or elevation of ctDNA mutation or BRAF^V600 ctDNA mutation was significantly associated with worse prognosis in melanoma patients.

SUBMITTER: Zheng Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8116156 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a potential biomarker for monitoring early non-small cell lung cancer (ENSCLC), particularly after radical surgery. However, the prognostic value of postoperative ctDNA is still being investigated due to the small sample size and heterogeneity of patients with ENSCLC in current trials. Moreover, the potential clinical utility of ctDNA assessment for administering adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with ENSCLC is also an important area of active research.ObjectivesWe aimed to identify the prognostic value of postoperative ctDNA detection in ENSCLC patients with stages I-III.DesignThis study type is a systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources and methodsWe conducted a search in the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for prospective or retrospective investigations involving patients with ENSCLC, gathering outcomes based on predefined end points. The literature review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to carry out a quality evaluation of the included studies. The primary end point of the study was to evaluate the association of ctDNA status in two time points (within 1 month after surgery and long-term postoperative monitoring with more than 3 months) with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In addition, the study investigated the role of ctDNA in predicting the response to AT. The secondary end points of the study were to determine the impact of ctDNA on RFS and OS in different subgroups of ENSCLC patients based on pathological subtypes and TNM staging.ResultsIn total, 2149 studies were screened, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The presence of ctDNA within 1 month after surgery as well as long-term postoperative ctDNA were both associated with poorer RFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.43; 95% CI: 3.23-6.07 and HR = 7.99; 95% CI: 3.28-19.44, respectively] and worse OS (HR = 5.07; 95% CI: 2.80-9.19 and HR = 7.49; 95% CI: 3.42-16.43, respectively). Most subgroup analyses yielded similar results. Moreover, ctDNA-positive patients could acquire survival benefits from AT (HR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16-0.54), while ctDNA-negative patients that received AT did not show significant improvement in RFS (HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.67-2.09).ConclusionThe postoperative ctDNA assessment is a promising approach to stratify the risk of relapse and death in ENSCLC patients. Our data suggest that patients with negative ctDNA in the postoperative setting may not benefit from AT, which warrants further investigation. This finding, if validated in prospective trials with a larger sample size, could aid in better-individualized treatment for patients and avoid potential side effects of AT.RegistrationThis study was designed in accordance with PRISMA and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022311615).

Project description:BackgroundThe plasma sample has emerged as a promising surrogate sample for EGFR mutation detection in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical practice, whether EGFR variants in baseline plasma ctDNA of advanced NSCLC can predict prognosis in addition to guiding targeted therapy remains to be further explored.Material and methodsIn total, 315 NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled. EGFR mutation data from tissue detected by ARMS-PCR and paired plasma samples within 1 month of admission detected by SuperARMS or ARMS-PCR were collected. The correlation between baseline plasma ctDNA EGFR mutation status and survival was compared.ResultsEGFR mutation detection rates in tumor samples and plasma samples were 65.1% (205/315) and 43.8% (138/315). Referred to tissue results, the consistent rate of test ctDNA EGFR alteration by SuperARMS was higher than that detected by ARMS (79.5% vs. 69.0%, p = 0.04), either in stage I-IIIA patients (85.7% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.4) or stage IIIB-IV patients (79.1% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.04). Patients' treatment status and pathological subtype were the two factors that affected plasma ctDNA EGFR alteration detection accuracy. The concordance in non-adenocarcinoma patients was obviously higher than that in adenocarcinoma (p = 0.02), and the concordance in treatment naïve patients was significantly higher than that in relapse patients (p = 0.047). In treatment naïve patients, the median PFS (mPFS) in plasma ctDNA EGFR-positive patients was shorter than that in plasma ctDNA EGFR negative patients (7.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.01). In relapsed patients, the mPFS in plasma ctDNA EGFR-positive patients was 9.0 months versus 11.0 months in plasma ctDNA EGFR negative patients (p = 0.1).ConclusionsA plasma sample could be an alternative for a molecular test when tissue samples was unavailable. The SuperARMS-PCR detection method has high sensitivity in real-world clinical practice. Furthermore, in patients with stage IIIB-IV, baseline plasma ctDNA EGFR mutation positivity not only guides targeted therapy but also predicts a worse prognosis.