Dataset Information

Which Type of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy is Appropriate? A 20-Year Retrospective Study of Bloodstream Infections in Childhood Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Sufficient empirical antimicrobial therapy in febrile patients with cancer is challenging, owing to the limited arsenal of available antibiotics in an era of growing resistance. Because of the emergence of gram-negative bacteria resistant to ceftazidime and piperacillin, a combination antibiotic therapy was employed that uses meropenem combined with gentamicin and/or vancomycin if the patient further deteriorates.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed including all patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) and treated for childhood cancer in a tertiary single centre between 1 January 2000 and 31 June 2018. We calculated the prevalence and the risk for BSIs and compared the in vitro susceptibility to various antimicrobial agents.

Results

Of 653 patients with childhood cancer, 113 patients (17.3%) were identified with a total of 139 BSIs, most of them occurring in patients with leukaemia (n = 90, 64.7%) and were associated with gram-positive bacteria (60.5%). In our cohort, all BSIs with gram-negative bacteria exhibited in vitro susceptibility against meropenem alone without any signs of resistance development. The antibiotic coverage of our meropenem-based combination therapy was also highly effective for gram-positive and non-fermenting bacteria. Thus, BSI-related mortality in all 139 BSI episodes was 1.4%. Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs), as main adverse event of carbapenem usage, occurred in only 16 (2.5%) patients.

Conclusion

Our meropenem-based combination therapy showed sufficient empirical antibiotic coverage in the majority of BSIs (96.4%) and did not result in an increased rate of unwanted side effects or development of antibiotic resistance.

SUBMITTER: Meryk A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8116419 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Quantifying the benefit of early antibiotic treatment is crucial for decision making and can be assessed only in observational studies. We performed a systematic review of prospective studies reporting the effect of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment on all-cause mortality among adult inpatients with sepsis. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa score. We calculated unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals for each study and extracted adjusted ORs, with variance, methods, and covariates being used for adjustment. ORs were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. We examined the effects of methodological and clinical confounders on results through subgroup analysis or mixed-effect meta-regression. Seventy studies were included, of which 48 provided an adjusted OR for inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was associated with significantly higher mortality in the unadjusted and adjusted comparisons, with considerable heterogeneity occurring in both analyses (I(2) > 70%). Study design, time of mortality assessment, the reporting methods of the multivariable models, and the covariates used for adjustment were significantly associated with effect size. Septic shock was the only clinical variable significantly affecting results (it was associated with higher ORs). Studies adjusting for background conditions and sepsis severity reported a pooled adjusted OR of 1.60 (95% confidence interval = 1.37 to 1.86; 26 studies; number needed to treat to prevent one fatal outcome, 10 patients [95% confidence interval = 8 to 15]; I(2) = 46.3%) given 34% mortality with inappropriate empirical treatment. Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality. However, the methods used in the observational studies significantly affect the effect size reported. Methods of observational studies assessing the effects of antibiotic treatment should be improved and standardized.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSI) cause significant morbidity and mortality due to the frequent antibiotic resistance, toxin and adhesin production of the bacterium. These characteristics differ significantly in methicillin resistant (MRSA) and methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and also among isolates of different MRSA clones, contributing to the outcome of S. aureus bacteraemia. METHODS:In this study, all MRSA BSI isolates from Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, isolated between 2011-2016 and the same number of matched MSSA (overall 306 isolates) were characterised in terms of antibiotic susceptibility, virulence genes, clonality and their association with all-cause 30-day mortality. Effect of patient related variables, such as age, gender and comorbidities were also investigated. RESULTS:ST22-MRSA-IV and ST5-MRSA-II were the most prevalent clones in our study. SCCmec I isolates showed the highest resistance rates and SCCmec II carried most virulence genes. Infections caused by SCCmec IV isolates were associated with the highest mortality rate (42.2%), despite the similar comorbidity rates of the different patient groups. All-cause 30-day mortality was 39.9% in the MRSA and 30.7% in the MSSA group. Increased teicoplanin MIC was associated with high mortality rate. Resistance to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and clindamycin was common in MRSA, whereas MSSA isolates were more sensitive to all antibiotics with the exception of doxycycline. All MRSA isolates were sensitive to glycopeptides and linezolid; resistance to rifampicin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim was low. MRSA isolates carried more adhesion genes, superantigens were more frequent in MSSA. Panton-Valentine leukocidin was found in 2.3% of the isolates. CONCLUSION:This study provides insight into the clonal composition and associated mortality of BSI S. aureus isolates in Hungary. The results suggest that the outcome of the infection is determined by the antibiotic resistance, genotype of the bacterium, and patient-related factors; rather than the virulence factors carried by the bacteria.