Dataset Information

Intraoperative molecular imaging clinical trials: a review of 2020 conference proceedings.

ABSTRACT:

Significance

Surgery is often paramount in the management of many solid organ malignancies because optimal resection is a major factor in disease-specific survival. Cancer surgery has multiple challenges including localizing small lesions, ensuring negative surgical margins around a tumor, adequately staging patients by discriminating positive lymph nodes, and identifying potential synchronous cancers. Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is an emerging potential tool proposed to address these issues. IMI is the process of injecting patients with fluorescent-targeted contrast agents that highlight cancer cells prior to surgery. Over the last 5 to 7 years, enormous progress has been achieved in tracer development, near-infrared camera approvals, and clinical trials. Therefore, a second biennial conference was organized at the University of Pennsylvania to gather surgical oncologists, scientists, and experts to discuss new investigative findings in the field. Our review summarizes the discussions from the conference and highlights findings in various clinical and scientific trials.

Aim

Recent advances in IMI were presented, and the importance of each clinical trial for surgical oncology was critically assessed. A major focus was to elaborate on the clinical endpoints that were being utilized in IMI trials to advance the respective surgical subspecialties.

Approach

Principal investigators presenting at the Perelman School of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center's second clinical trials update on IMI were selected to discuss their clinical trials and endpoints.

Results

Multiple phase III, II, and I trials were discussed during the conference. Since the approval of 5-ALA for commercial use in neurosurgical malignancies, multiple tracers and devices have been developed to address common challenges faced by cancer surgeons across numerous specialties. Discussants also presented tracers that are being developed for delineation of normal anatomic structures that can serve as an adjunct during surgical procedures.

Conclusions

IMI is increasingly being recognized as an improvement to standard oncologic surgical resections and will likely advance the art of cancer surgery in the coming years. The endpoints in each individual surgical subspecialty are varied depending on how IMI helps each specialty solve their clinical challenges.

SUBMITTER: Azari F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8126806 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Thyroglobulin (Tg) protein is synthesised uniquely by thyroid tissue and is measured as a post-operative differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) tumour-marker. Tg autoantibodies (TgAb), present in ?20 percent of DTC patients, interfere with Tg immunometric assay (IMA) measurements causing falsely low/undetectable serum Tg values. Tg radioimmunoassay (RIA) methodology appears resistant to such interferences but has limited availability, whereas new Tg mass-spectrometry methods have inferior sensitivity and unproven clinical value. When present, TgAb concentrations respond to changes in thyroid tissue mass. Thus, when Tg IMA measurements are compromised by the presence of TgAb the TgAb trend can serve as a surrogate DTC tumour-marker. Unfortunately, both physiologic and technical factors impact the interpretation of Tg and TgAb used as DTC tumour-markers. Serum Tg Testing Circulating Tg concentrations change in response to thyroid tissue mass, injury (surgery, biopsy or radioiodine) and the degree of TSH stimulation. Technical factors (Tg assay sensitivity, specificity and interferences) additionally impact the clinical utility of Tg testing. Specifically, new 2nd generation Tg IMAs (functional sensitivities ? 0.1 ?g/L) now mostly obviate the need for expensive recombinant human TSH(rhTSH)-stimulated Tg testing. Tg molecular heterogeneity remains responsible for two-fold between-method differences in Tg values that preclude switching methods and TgAb interference remains especially problematic. Serum TgAb Testing Reliable TgAb testing is critical for authenticating that Tg IMA measurements are not compromised by interference. Unfortunately, TgAb methodologies vary widely in sensitivity, specificity and the absolute values they report, necessitating that TgAb concentrations be monitored using the same method. Furthermore, adopting the manufacturer’s TgAb cut-off value to define a ‘detectable’ TgAb results in falsely classifying sera as TgAb-negative, because manufacturers’ cut-offs are set to diagnose thyroid autoimmunity and not to detect TgAb interference.