Dataset Information

EGFR mutation status yield from bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma compared to a venous blood sample and tissue biopsy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In recent years, there has been a revolution in the genomic profiling and molecular typing of lung cancer. A key oncogene is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The gold standard for determining EGFR mutation status is tissue biopsy, where a histological specimen is taken by a bronchoscopic or surgical method (transbronchial biopsy, forceps biopsy, etc.). However, in clinical practice the tissue sample is often insufficient for morphological and molecular analysis. Bronchoalveolar lavage is a validated diagnostic method for pathogenic infections in the lower respiratory tract, yet its diagnostic value for oncogenic mutation testing in lung cancer has not been extensively investigated. This study aims to compare the prevalence of EGFR mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and peripheral blood referring to the gold standard - tissue biopsy in patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with adenocarcinoma were examined for EGFR mutation from tissue biopsy, peripheral blood sample and bronchoalveolar lavage.

Results

Thirteen patients had wild type EGFR and the other 13 had EGFR mutation. EGFR mutation from a peripheral blood sample was identified in 38.5% (5/13) of patients, whereas EGFR mutation obtained from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was identified in 92.3% (12/13). This study demonstrates that a liquid biopsy sample for EGFR status from BAL has a higher sensitivity compared to a venous blood sample.

SUBMITTER: Yanev N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8127956 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDifferentiating malignant lung tumors from benign pulmonary nodules is a great challenge. While the analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is used for diagnosing infections and interstitial lung diseases, there is limited evidence to support its use for lung cancer diagnosis. This study aimed to interrogate the potential of using BALF cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to discriminate malignant lesions from benign nodules.MethodsFifty-three patients with solid pulmonary nodules (≤2 cm) were prospectively enrolled, including 21 confirmed with benign disease and 32 with malignant tumors. Mutations were profiled for 30 tumor tissues and 40 BALFs. Paired BALFs and plasma from 48 patients underwent DNA methylation profiling. A methylome-based classification model was developed for BALF and plasma separately.ResultsAmong the 30 patients with paired tissues and BALFs, 96.7% and 70% had alterations detected from their tissues (79 alterations) and BALFs (53 alterations), respectively. Using tissues as references, BALFs revealed 14 new alterations and missed 41. BALF mutation displayed a sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 77.8%, and accuracy of 72.5% in detecting lung cancer. BALF methylation achieved an accuracy of 81.3%, with both sensitivity and specificity being 81%. Plasma methylation showed a 66.7% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, and 68.8% accuracy. BALF methylation also demonstrated 82.4% sensitivity in stage I patients. Parallel bronchoscopy, lavage cytology, and bronchial brushing demonstrated an inferior sensitivity of 23%, 3.1%, and 9.7%, respectively, compared with BALF methylation and mutation (P<0.0001).ConclusionsBALF cfDNA can serve as a liquid biopsy media for both mutation and methylation profiling, demonstrating better sensitivities in distinguishing small malignant tumors from benign nodules than conventional methods.KeywordsLung cancer diagnosis; pulmonary nodule; bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF); methylation; genomic mutation.

Project description:BackgroundIt is now possible to comprehensively characterize the microbiota of the lungs using culture-independent, sequencing-based assays. Several sample types have been used to investigate the lung microbiota, each presenting specific challenges for preparation and analysis of microbial communities. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) enables the identification of microbiota specific to the lower lung but commonly has low bacterial density, increasing the risk of false-positive signal from contaminating DNA. The objectives of this study were to investigate the extent of contamination across a range of sample densities representative of BALF and identify features of contaminants that facilitate their removal from sequence data and aid in the interpretation of BALF sample 16S sequencing data.ResultsUsing three mock communities across a range of densities ranging from 8E+?02 to 8E+?09 16S copies/ml, we assessed taxonomic accuracy and precision by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and the proportion of reads arising from contaminants. Sequencing accuracy, precision, and the relative abundance of mock community members decreased with sample input density, with a significant drop-off below 8E+?05 16S copies/ml. Contaminant OTUs were commonly inversely correlated with sample input density or not reproduced between technical replicates. Removal of taxa with these features or physical concentration of samples prior to sequencing improved both sequencing accuracy and precision for samples between 8E+?04 and 8E+?06 16S copies/ml. For the lowest densities, below 8E+?03 16S copies/ml BALF, accuracy and precision could not be significantly improved using these approaches. Using clinical BALF samples across a large density range, we observed that OTUs with features of contaminants identified in mock communities were also evident in low-density BALF samples.ConclusionRelative abundance data and community composition generated by 16S sequencing of BALF samples across the range of density commonly observed in this sample type should be interpreted in the context of input sample density and may be improved by simple pre- and post-sequencing steps for densities above 8E+?04 16S copies/ml.