Strategies for Implementation Research to Investigate the Negative Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Efavirenz and Dolutegravir.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Morse GD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8130025 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Rifampicin, a potent enzyme inducer, causes marked reduction of dolutegravir exposure. Rifabutin, a less potent enzyme inducer, may offer an alternative to rifampicin. We aimed to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir when co-administered with rifabutin. We extended an existing dolutegravir model to include data from volunteers co-administered with dolutegravir 50 mg and rifabutin 300 mg once daily. We ran simulations of dolutegravir with and without rifabutin co-administration and compare dolutegravir trough concentrations with the IC90 and EC90 of 0.064 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively. Rifabutin decreased dolutegravir's volume of distribution by 33.1% (95% confidence interval 25.1%-42.3%) but did not affect the area under the concentration-time curve. Simulations showed that when 50 mg dolutegravir is co-administered with rifabutin once daily, the probability to attain trough concentrations above the IC90 of 0.064 mg/L is more than 99%. Therefore, there is no need for dolutegravir dose adjustment. Rifabutin may offer an alternative to rifampicin for the treatment of HIV/tuberculosis co-infected individuals.
| S-EPMC10789188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dolutegravir (DTG) and GSK1265744 are HIV integrase inhibitors (INIs) in clinical development. The oral formulation of rilpivirine (RPV), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), has been approved for treatment-naive HIV infection. Long-acting depot injections of GSK1265744 and RPV are also being developed. This study evaluated the potential for drug interactions between RPV and these INIs. This phase 1, open-label, two-cohort, three-period, single-sequence crossover study evaluated oral coadministration of RPV with DTG or GSK1265744. Healthy subjects received DTG (50 mg every 24 h for 5 days) or GSK1265744 (30 mg every 24 h for 12 days) in period 1 followed by a washout, RPV (25 mg every 24 h for 11 or 12 days) in period 2, immediately followed by RPV (25 mg every 24 h) plus DTG (50 mg every 24 h) for 5 days or GSK1265744 (30 mg every 24 h) for 12 days in period 3. Steady-state pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis of data collected on the last day of each period. The combinations of RPV and DTG (n = 16) and of RPV and GSK1265744 (n = 11) were well tolerated; no grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) or AE-related discontinuations were observed. The 90% confidence intervals for the area under the curve from time zero until the end of the dosage interval [AUC0-?] and maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) geometric mean ratios were within 0.8 to 1.25. Following administration of DTG + RPV, DTG and RPV C? increased by 22% and 21%, respectively. Following administration of GSK1265744 + RPV, RPV C? decreased 8%. DTG and GSK1265744 can be administered with RPV without dosage adjustment for either agent. These results support coadministration of RPV with DTG or GSK1265744 as either oral or long-acting depot injection regimens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01467531.).
| S-EPMC3811315 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDolutegravir is associated with more weight gain than efavirenz. Loss-of-function polymorphisms in CYP2B6 result in higher efavirenz concentrations, which we hypothesized would impair weight gain among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PLWH) starting efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART).MethodsWe studied ART-naive participants from the ADVANCE study randomized to the efavirenz /emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and dolutegravir/emtricitabine/TDF arms. We compared changes in weight and regional fat on DXA from baseline to week 48 between CYP2B6 metabolizer genotypes in the efavirenz arm, and with the dolutegravir arm.ResultsThere were 342 participants in the dolutegravir arm and 168 in the efavirenz arm who consented to genotyping. Baseline characteristics were similar. Weight gain was greater in women than men. In the efavirenz arm CYP2B6 metaboliser genotype was associated with weight gain (P = .009), with extensive metabolizers gaining the most weight, and with changes in regional fat in women, but not in men. Weight gain was similar in CYP2B6 extensive metabolizers in the efavirenz arm and in the dolutegravir arm (P = .836). The following variables were independently associated with weight gain in all participants: baseline CD4 count, baseline human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA, and CYP2B6 metaboliser genotype.ConclusionsCYP2B6 metaboliser genotype was associated with weight gain in PLWH starting efavirenz-based ART. Weight gain was similar between CYP2B6 extensive metabolizers in the efavirenz arm and in the dolutegravir arm, suggesting that impaired weight gain among CYP2B6 slow or intermediate metabolizers could explain the increased weight gain on dolutegravir compared with efavirenz observed in ADVANCE and other studies.
| S-EPMC8653639 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dolutegravir is a second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) currently under review by the US Food and Drug Administration for marketing approval. The in vitro, protein-adjusted 90 % inhibitory concentration (IC90) of dolutegravir for wild-type virus is 0.064 ?g/ml, and it retains in vitro anti-HIV 1 activity across a broad range of viral phenotypes that are known to confer resistance to the currently marketed INSTIs, raltegravir and elvitegravir. Dolutegravir has a terminal elimination half-life of 13-14 h and maintains concentrations over the in vitro, protein-adjusted IC90 for more than 30 h following a single dose. Additionally, dolutegravir has low inter-subject variability compared with raltegravir and elvitegravir. A plasma exposure-response relationship has been well described, with antiviral activity strongly correlating with trough concentrations. Phase III trials have assessed the antiviral activity of dolutegravir compared with efavirenz and raltegravir in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients and found that dolutegravir achieved more rapid and sustained virologic suppression in both instances. Additionally, studies of dolutegravir activity in patients with known INSTI-resistant mutations have been favourable, indicating that dolutegravir retains activity in a variety of INSTI-resistant phenotypes. Much like currently marketed INSTIs, dolutegravir is very well tolerated. Because dolutegravir inhibits the renal transporter organic cation transporter 2, reduced tubular secretion of creatinine leads to non-progressive increases in serum creatinine. These serum creatinine increases have not been associated with a decreased glomerular filtration rate or progressive renal impairment. Dolutegravir's major and minor metabolic pathways are uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and cytochrome P450 (CYP)-3A4, respectively, and it neither induces nor inhibits CYP isoenzymes. Thus dolutegravir has a modest drug interaction profile. However, antacids significantly decrease dolutegravir plasma exposure and should be separated by 2 h before, or 6 h after, a dolutegravir dose. In summary, dolutegravir is the first of the second-generation INSTIs and exhibits a predictable pharmacokinetic profile and a well-defined exposure-response relationship. Dolutegravir retains activity despite the presence of some class-resistant mutations and achieves rapid and sustained virologic suppression in ARV-naive and ARV-experienced patients. Clinically, dolutegravir is poised to become a commonly used component of antiretroviral regimens.
| S-EPMC3805712 | biostudies-other
Project description:Many patients switch from efavirenz- to dolutegravir-based regimens. In a phase 1 dolutegravir-efavirenz interaction study, mean dolutegravir minimum concentration decreased by 60% and 85% among CYP2B6 normal and slow/intermediate metabolizers, respectively. Mean efavirenz half-life was 2.7 times greater in slow vs normal metabolizers. Slow metabolizers will experience more prolonged subtherapeutic dolutegravir concentrations.
| S-EPMC8130017 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:The drug-drug interactions between pitavastatin and darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) as well as pitavastatin and efavirenz (EFV) were examined in an open-label, parallel-arm, pharmacokinetic (PK) study in HIV-uninfected healthy volunteers. METHODS:Subjects received a pitavastatin dose of 2 mg for 4 days, followed by either EFV 600 mg (n = 14) or DRV/r 800/100 mg (n = 14) daily for 10 days, and pitavastatin 2 mg coadministered with EFV 600 mg or DRV/r 800/100 mg for 4 days. Full PK profiles were determined for pitavastatin and its lactone metabolite on days 4 and 18 and for EFV or DRV on days 14 and 18. RESULTS:In the EFV arm, the geometric mean area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-?) and Cmax of pitavastatin were 85.3 ng·h·mL and 15.6 ng/mL, respectively, when given alone, versus 76 ng·h·mL and 18.8 ng/mL when coadministered with EFV. The geometric mean ratio for pitavastatin with EFV versus alone was 0.89 [90% confidence interval (CI): 0.73 to 1.09] for AUC0-? and 1.20 (90% CI: 0.79 to 1.83) for Cmax. In the DRV/r arm, AUC0-? and Cmax were 62.8 ng·h·mL and 24.0 ng/mL, respectively, when pitavastatin was administered alone, versus 56.9 ng·h·mL and 23.2 ng/mL when coadministered with DRV/r. The geometric mean ratio for pitavastatin with DRV/r versus alone was 0.91 (90% CI: 0.78 to 1.06) for AUC0-? and 0.93 (90% CI: 0.72 to 1.19) for Cmax. CONCLUSIONS:There were no significant PK interactions between pitavastatin and EFV or DRV/r. No significant safety issues or lipid changes were noted.
| S-EPMC4404408 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The genomic inter-individual heterogeneity remains a significant challenge for both clinical decision-making and the design of clinical trials. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly implemented in drug development and clinical trials, translation of the obtained genomic information into actionable clinical advice lags behind. Major reasons are the paucity of sufficiently powered trials that can quantify the added value of pharmacogenetic testing, and the considerable pharmacogenetic complexity with millions of rare variants with unclear functional consequences. The resulting uncertainty is reflected in inconsistencies of pharmacogenomic drug labels in Europe and the United States. In this review, we discuss how the knowledge gap for bridging pharmacogenomics into the clinics can be reduced. First, emerging methods that allow the high-throughput experimental characterization of pharmacogenomic variants combined with novel computational tools hold promise to improve the accuracy of drug response predictions. Second, tapping of large biobanks of therapeutic drug monitoring data allows to conduct high-powered retrospective studies that can validate the clinical importance of genetic variants, which are currently incompletely characterized. Combined, we are confident that these methods will improve the accuracy of drug response predictions and will narrow the gap between variant identification and its utilization for clinical decision-support.
| S-EPMC7057970 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDaclatasvir (DCV) is an NS5A replication complex inhibitor recently approved for chronic hepatitis C virus treatment.MethodsTo assess drug interactions between the HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) and DCV, subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 sequences in an open-label, 3-period, crossover study. Subjects received either DTG 50 mg once daily or DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in periods 1 and 2 and DTG 50 mg plus DCV 60 mg once daily for 5 days in period 3, with no washout between periods 2 and 3. Between periods 1 and 2, there was a washout period of at least 7 days.ResultsThe geometric least-squares mean ratios (90 % confidence intervals) of DCV area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (AUC0-τ), maximum observed concentration (Cmax), and concentration at the end of the dosing interval (Cτ) were 0.978 (0.831-1.15), 1.03 (0.843-1.25), and 1.06 (0.876-1.29), respectively, when DCV was administered with DTG compared with DCV alone. Compared with DTG alone, coadministration of DTG with DCV increased DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ by approximately 33, 29, and 45 %, respectively.ConclusionsDCV plasma exposure was not meaningfully affected by DTG. Coadministration of DTG with DCV resulted in slight increases in DTG AUC0-τ, Cmax, and Cτ. Accumulated safety and tolerability data in humans receiving DTG to date suggests this effect is not considered clinically significant. DTG and DCV can be coadministered without dose adjustment.Trial registrationRegistered on March 6, 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov; registration number: NCT02082808 and as Study ID: 201102 on the ViiV Clinical Study Registry.
| S-EPMC4957413 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEffective communication of research findings on vector-borne diseases in Africa is challenging for a number of reasons. Following the experiences of a number of researchers over the life of a project, this article looks for lessons that can be shared with the wider research community.Main bodyBetween 2014 and 2017, a set of five inter-disciplinary teams from seven African countries collaborated on a project focusing on vector-borne diseases in the context of climate change. A central objective of this work was to influence policy and programming with relevant research findings. This article examines how principles of research communication, derived from the literature and current guidelines, can be applied in practice. Several challenges and lessons are highlighted, showing that research communication takes place within difficult constraints and in complex, fluid institutional and political environments. The processes of communication between policymakers and researchers including stakeholder mapping, defining research communication plans and tailoring communication products are discussed.ConclusionsThe article concludes that while guidelines and frameworks for research communication are helpful, they should not detract from the ability of local teams to adapt to circumstances. Of key importance are the relationships and networks of local research teams.
| S-EPMC6896314 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody is present in most patients enrolled in methadone maintenance programs. Therefore, interactions between the HCV protease inhibitor telaprevir and methadone were investigated. The pharmacokinetics of R- and S-methadone were measured after administration of methadone alone and after 7 days of telaprevir (750 mg every 8 h [q8h]) coadministration in HCV-negative subjects on stable, individualized methadone therapy. Unbound R-methadone was measured in predose plasma samples before and during telaprevir coadministration. Safety and symptoms of opioid withdrawal were evaluated throughout the study. In total, 18 subjects were enrolled; 2 discontinued prior to receiving telaprevir. The minimum plasma concentration in the dosing interval (C(min)), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from h 0 (time of administration) to 24 h postdose (AUC(0-24)) for R-methadone were reduced by 31%, 29%, and 29%, respectively, in the presence of telaprevir. The AUC0-24 ratio of S-methadone/R-methadone was not altered. The median unbound percentage of R-methadone increased by 26% in the presence of telaprevir. The R-methadone median (absolute) unbound C(min) values in the absence (10.63 ng/ml) and presence (10.45 ng/ml) of telaprevir were similar. There were no symptoms of opioid withdrawal and no discontinuations due to adverse events. In summary, exposure to total R-methadone was reduced by approximately 30% in the presence of telaprevir, while the exposure to unbound R-methadone was unchanged. No symptoms of opioid withdrawal were observed. These results suggest that dose adjustment of methadone is not required when initiating telaprevir treatment. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00933283.).
| S-EPMC3632951 | biostudies-literature