Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Vijayaraghavan M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8130995 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.
Vijayaraghavan Maya M Elser Holly H Frazer Kate K Lindson Nicola N Apollonio Dorie D
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 20201203
<h4>Background</h4>Populations experiencing homelessness have high rates of tobacco use and experience substantial barriers to cessation. Tobacco-caused conditions are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among people experiencing homelessness, highlighting an urgent need for interventions to reduce the burden of tobacco use in this population.<h4>Objectives</h4>To assess whether interventions designed to improve access to tobacco cessation interventions for adults experiencing ho ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Backgroundolder people experiencing homelessness can have mental and physical indicators of aging several decades earlier than the general population and experience premature mortality due to age-related chronic conditions. Digital interventions could positively impact the health and well-being of homeless people. However, increased reliance on digital delivery may also perpetuate digital inequalities for socially excluded groups. The potential triple disadvantage of being older, homeless, and digitally excluded creates a uniquely problematic situation warranting further research. Few studies have synthesized available literature on digital interventions for older people experiencing homelessness.ObjectiveThis scoping review examined the use, range, and nature of digital interventions available to older people experiencing homelessness and organizations supporting them.MethodsThe scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley's proposed methodology, PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, and recent Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. We searched 14 databases. Gray literature sources were searched to supplement the electronic database search. A narrative synthesis approach was conducted on the included articles, and common themes were identified inductively through thematic analysis.ResultsA total of 19,915 records were identified through database and gray literature searching. We identified 10 articles reporting on digital interventions that had a clearly defined a participant age group of >50 years or a mean participant age of >50 years. A total of 9 of 10 studies were published in the United States. The study design included descriptive studies, uncontrolled pilot studies, and pilot randomized controlled trials. No studies aimed to deliver an intervention exclusively to older people experiencing homelessness or organizations that supported them. Four types of intervention were identified: telecare for people experiencing homelessness, distributing technology to enable digital inclusion, text message reminders, and interventions delivered digitally. Interventions delivered digitally included smoking cessation support, vocational training, physical activity promotion, and cognitive behavioral therapy. Overall, the included studies demonstrated evidence for the acceptability and feasibility of digital interventions for older people experiencing homelessness, and all 10 studies reported some improvements in digital inclusion or enhanced engagement among participants. However, several barriers to digital interventions were identified, particularly aspects related to digital inclusion, such as infrastructure, digital literacy, and age. Proposed facilitators for digital interventions included organizational and peer support.ConclusionsOur findings highlight a paucity of evaluated digital interventions targeted at older people experiencing homelessness. However, the included studies demonstrated evidence of the acceptability and feasibility of digital interventions for older people experiencing homelessness. Further research on digital interventions that provide services and support older people experiencing homelessness is required. Future interventions must address the barriers older people experiencing homelessness face when accessing digital technology with the input of those with lived experience of homelessness.Trial registrationOSF Registries OSF.IO/7QGTY; https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7QGTY.
| S-EPMC11890140 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe opioid-related overdose epidemic remains a persistent public health problem in the United States and has been accelerated by the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic. Existing, evidence-based treatment options for opioid use disorder (OUD) are broadly underutilized, particularly by people experiencing homelessness (PEH). PEH are also more likely to misuse and overdose on opioids. To better understand current gaps and disparities in OUD treatment experienced by PEH and efforts to address them, we synthesized the literature reporting on the intersection of housing status and OUD treatment.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature from the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection. We included studies describing treatment-related outcomes specific to PEH and articles assessing OUD treatment interventions tailored to this population. Relevant findings were compiled via thematic analysis and narratively synthesized.Results60 articles met our inclusion criteria, including 43 descriptive and 17 intervention-focused studies. These studies demonstrated that PEH experience more barriers to OUD treatment than their housed counterparts and access inpatient and detoxification treatment more commonly than pharmacotherapy. However, the reviewed literature indicated that PEH have similar outcomes once engaged in pharmacotherapy. Efficacious interventions for PEH were low-barrier and targeted, with housing interventions also demonstrating benefit.ConclusionsPEH have diminished access to evidence-based OUD treatment, particularly medications, and require targeted approaches to improve engagement and retention. To mitigate the disproportionate opioid-related morbidity and mortality PEH experience, innovative, flexible, and interdisciplinary OUD treatment models are necessary, with housing support playing an important role.
| S-EPMC9758007 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveeHealth interventions are being developed to meet the needs of diverse populations. Despite these advancements, little is known about how these interventions are used to improve the health of persons experiencing homelessness. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and experience of eHealth interventions for the homeless population.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted along with forward and backward citation searching to identify relevant articles.ResultsEight articles met eligibility criteria. All articles were pilot or feasibility studies that used modalities, including short message service, mobile apps, computers, email, and websites, to deliver the interventions. The accessibility, flexibility, and convenience of the interventions were valued by participants. However, phone retention, limited adaptability, a high level of human involvement, and preference for in-person communication may pose future implementation challenges.ConclusionseHealth interventions are promising digital tools that have the potential to improve access to care and service delivery. eHealth interventions are feasible and usable for persons experiencing homelessness. These interventions may have health benefits by augmenting existing services and if implementation challenges are addressed. Further evaluation of the effectiveness of eHealth interventions is needed before widespread implementation. Those with lived experience should also be engaged in developing and evaluating these interventions.
| S-EPMC7863153 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The prevalence of cigarette smoking among people experiencing homelessness is 70%. The internet is a common mode of exposure to tobacco-related messaging, yet little is known about these exposures among people experiencing homelessness. Using time-location sampling, we recruited a sample of adults experiencing homelessness who were current cigarette smokers (i.e. smoked in the past 30 days) from shelters and service sites in San Francisco. We administered a survey to explore self-reported use of the internet and online streaming services; and exposure to tobacco messaging online and offline. Of the 470 participants, 75.5% reported using the internet and 67.2% reported using online streaming video in a typical week. Many participants had seen online advertisements for tobacco products (N = 197, 41.7%) or anti-tobacco industry messages (N = 215, 45.6%), although participants reported seeing both advertisements and warnings related to tobacco more frequently offline than online. Respondents who reported using the internet for more than 4 h in a typical week were more likely to recall seeing tobacco-related warnings or advertisements online. Respondents who reported seeing tobacco-related warnings and advertisements were more likely to have attempted to quit smoking within the past year. These findings suggest an opportunity to use the internet to communicate the harms of tobacco products with messages tailored towards adults experiencing homelessness. Our results suggest further that now is the time to saturate the internet and online streaming services with anti-tobacco industry messages before advertisements for tobacco products become as ubiquitous online as they are elsewhere.
| S-EPMC6627028 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7397556 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Summary Background People experiencing homelessness have significant unmet needs and high rates of unplanned care. We aimed to describe preventative interventions, defined in their broadest sense, for people experiencing homelessness in a hospital context. Secondary aims included mapping outcomes and assessing intervention effectiveness. Methods We searched online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) from 1999–2019 and conducted backward and forward citation searches to 31 December 2020 (PROSPERO CRD42019154036). We included quantitative studies in emergency and inpatient settings measuring health or social outcomes for adults experiencing homelessness in high income countries. We assessed rigour using the “Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies” and summarised findings using descriptive quantitative methods, a binomial test, a Harvest Plot, and narrative synthesis. We used PRISMA and SWiM reporting guidelines. Findings Twenty-eight studies identified eight intervention types: care coordination (n=18); advocacy, support, and outreach (n=13); social welfare assistance (n=13); discharge planning (n=12); homelessness identification (n=6); psychological therapy and treatment (n=6); infectious disease prevention (n=5); and screening, treatment, and referrals (n=5). The evidence strength was weak (n=16) to moderate (n=10), with two high quality randomised controlled trials. We identified six outcome categories with potential benefits observed for psychosocial outcomes, including housing (11/13 studies, 95%CI=54.6–98.1%, p=0.023), healthcare use (14/17, 56.6–96.2%, p=0.013), and healthcare costs (8/8, 63.1–100%, p=0.008). Benefits were less likely for health outcomes (4/5, 28.3–99.5%, p=0.375), integration with onward care (2/4, 6.8–93.2%, p=1.000), and feasibility/acceptability (5/6, 35.9–99.6%, p=0.219), but confidence intervals were very wide. We observed no harms. Most studies showing potential benefits were multi-component interventions. Interpretation Hospital-based preventative interventions for people experiencing homelessness are potentially beneficial, but more rigorous research is needed. In the context of high needs and extreme inequities, policymakers and healthcare providers may consider implementing multi-component preventative interventions. Funding SL is supported by an NIHR Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (ICA-CDRF-2016-02-042). JD is supported by an NIHR School of Public Health Research Pre-doctoral Fellowship (NU-004252). RWA is supported by a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (206602).
| S-EPMC9597099 | biostudies-literature
Project description:70%+ of youth and young adults experiencing homelessness (YYEH; 14-24 years old) smoke combustible tobacco. Little is known about the prevalence of acquired brain injury (ABI) among youth and young adult smokers experiencing homelessness (YYSEH) and its impact on tobacco use progression-the aim of our study. Through an interviewer-administered survey, YYSEH were asked about timing of tobacco use; exposure to causes of ABI; including brain oxygen deprivation (BOD; strangulation; accidental; choking games) and blunt force head trauma (BFHT; intentional; shaken violently; accidental); and perpetrators of intentional assault. Participants (n = 96) were on average 22 years old and from populations who experience structural disparities; including those minoritized by race (84.4%) and gender/sexual orientation (26.0%). In total, 87% of participants reported at least one exposure to BFHT and 65% to BOD. Intentional injury was more common than accidental. Furthermore, 60.4% of participants (n = 59) were classified as having ABI using the Brain Injury Severity Assessment. A significant proportion of YYSEH living with ABI were exposed to both BFHT and BOD prior to trying (68.5%, p = 0.002) and to first regular use (82.8%, p < 0.001) of tobacco. Among YYSEH with ABI; injury exposure occurred a median of 1 and 5 years before age of first regular tobacco use, dependent on injury mechanism. ABI from intentional violence is prevalent and precedes tobacco use among YYSEH.
| S-EPMC10049052 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo examine whether timely outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge reduces the risk of subsequent rehospitalization among people experiencing homelessness and mental illness.Data sourcesComprehensive linked administrative data including hospital admissions, laboratory services, and community medical services.Study designParticipants were recruited to the Vancouver At Home study based on a-priori criteria for homelessness and mental illness (n = 497). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between outpatient care within 7 days postdischarge and subsequent rehospitalization over a 1-year period.Data extractionData were extracted for a consenting subsample of participants (n = 433) spanning 5 years prior to study enrollment.Principal findingsMore than half of the eligible sample (53 percent; n = 128) were rehospitalized within 1 year following an index hospital discharge. Neither outpatient medical services nor laboratory services within 7 days following discharge were associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of rehospitalization within 2 months (AOR = 1.17 [CI = 0.94, 1.46]), 6 months (AOR = 1.00 [CI = 0.82, 1.23]) or 12 months (AOR = 1.24 [CI = 1.02, 1.52]).ConclusionsIn contrast to evidence from nonhomeless samples, we found no association between timely outpatient follow-up and the likelihood of rehospitalization in our homeless, mentally ill cohort. Our findings indicate a need to address housing as an essential component of discharge planning alongside outpatient care.
| S-EPMC6153158 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrior work suggests that people experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at heightened risk for developing pain and have a uniquely burdensome pain experience.PurposeThe aim of this scoping review was to map the current peer-reviewed, published literature on the pain experience of PEH.MethodsIn accordance with the US Annual Homeless Assessment Report, we defined homelessness as lacking shelter or a fixed address within the last year. We conceptualized the pain experience via a modified version of the Social Communication Model of Pain, which considers patient, provider, and contextual factors. Published articles were identified with CINHAL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases.ResultsSixty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. Studies revealed that PEH have high rates of pain and experience high levels of pain intensity and interference. Substantially fewer studies examined other factors relevant to the pain experience, such as self-management, treatment-seeking behaviors, and pain management within healthcare settings. Nonetheless, initial evidence suggests that pain is undermanaged in PEH.ConclusionsFuture research directions to understand pain and homelessness are discussed, including factors contributing to the under-management of pain. This scoping review may inform future work to develop interventions to address the specific pain care needs of PEH.
| S-EPMC10094969 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6463938 | biostudies-literature