Dataset Information

Combined therapy of hypertensive nephropathy with ginkgo leaf extract and dipyridamole injection and antihypertensive drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In recent years, the incidence rate of hypertensive nephropathy has been increasing quickly, which has been a major threat to people's health. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers have certain curative effects. However, there are some patients having serious adverse reactions, and the benefit population is limited, so the treatment of hypertensive renal damage is necessary to have beneficial supplement. More and more clinical studies have shown that ginkgo leaf extract and dipyridamole injection (GDI) combined with antihypertensive drugs has achieved good results in the treatment of hypertensive renal damage. It is supposed to be a supplementary treatment in hypertensive nephropathy.

Objectives

To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of GDI combined with antihypertensive drugs on hypertensive renal injury.

Methods

Seven databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang database, China biomedical literature service system (Sino Med), VIP Chinese Sci-tech journal database (VIP), and China national knowledge internet (CNKI) were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the experimental group containing combined therapy of hypertensive nephropathy with GDI and antihypertensive drugs. The retrieval time was from the establishment of database to July 8, 2020. Two researchers independently selected literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the study. The methodological quality was evaluated with Cochrane handbook and meta-analysis was performed with Stata 14.0 software.

Results

Eight studies were included in this study which involved 556 patients. The meta-analyses indicated that, compared with using antihypertensive drugs alone, combined treatment of GDI with antihypertensive drugs can decrease 24-hour urinary total protein (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82, -0.39; k = 6, P ≤ .001), blood urea nitrogen (WMD -1.27, 95% CI: -2.45, -0.10; k = 6, P = .033, serum creatinine (WMD -29.50, 95% CI: -56.44, -2.56; number of estimates [k] = 6, P = .032).

Conclusions

Our meta-analyses showed that GDI combined with antihypertensive drugs can improve the renal function of hypertensive patients with renal injury.

SUBMITTER: Jialiken D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8133258 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Hypertension, a risk factor for cardiovascular events, is often associated with chronic kidney disease. This is called hypertensive nephropathy (HN), which negatively affects physical fitness and body mass, leading to economic burden. Traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) are common traditional Chinese-patent medicine preparations in China. There was a lack of evidence to prove which TCMIs combine with ADs (TCMIs+ADs) may be a therapeutic option for HN. Thus, we systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of various TCMIs + ADs in patients with HN. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP information resource integration service platform databases for relevant Chinese- and English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception until May 2021. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment was performed by two reviewers independently but using the same criteria. We performed the effect modeling to analyze the data for all outcomes and ranked each intervention using the P-score. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and funnel plots were used to test the stability, heterogeneity, and publication bias, respectively. Results: We included 69 RCTs with 6373 patients and including six TCMIs + ADs. Network analysis indicated that the ginkgo leaf extract and dipyridamole combined with ADs (GLED + ADs) was the most efficacious in terms of 24-h urinary protein excretion [mean difference (MD) = -0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.82 to -0.58; P-score = 1] and systolic blood pressure (MD = -12.95, 95% CI: -21.03 to -4.88; P-score = 0.88), whereas the salvianolate combined with ADs (SA + ADs) showed the highest effectiveness for diastolic blood pressure (MD = -6.88, 95% CI: -10.55 to -3.21; P-score = 0.9). Based on the combined P-score of network meta-analysis results (88% and 85.26%) and sensitivity analysis results (72% and 71.54%), the biplots showed that the GLED + ADs was the most efficacious intervention in all TCMIs + ADs for primary outcomes, followed by the SA + ADs and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate combined with ADs (STS + ADs). There was no significant difference in terms of safety between TCMIs + ADs and ADs alone. Conclusion: Of all the TCMIs + ADs, GLED + ADs, SA + ADs, and STS + ADs may demonstrate a higher efficacy than ADs alone for HN. Weighing with the potential benefits and limitations in methodology, potential heterogeneity and outcomes, we should use various TCMIs with caution in clinical practice. Nevertheless, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted and future research should focus on the clinical value of core outcomes to confirm the effectiveness and safety of TCMIs for HN. Systematic Review Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier CRD42020205358.

Project description:Although the antitumor effects of antihypertensive drugs for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been investigated, their efficacy remains unclear. Previous studies suggest that hypertensive (HT) patients with APC are significantly older than non-HT patients with APC, and that other major baseline differences in patient characteristics which may affect prognosis exist between HT and non-HT patients. It is also possible that antihypertensive drugs lack antitumor activity. Therefore, we herein retrospectively investigated the baseline differences between HT and non-HT patients with APC. From January 2015 to April 2020, 56 patients with APC received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy at Higashiosaka City Medical Center (Higashiosaka, Japan). Of these 56 patients, 30 were diagnosed with hypertension (HT group); the remaining 26 did not have hypertension (non-HT group). Differences between the two groups were compared and prognostic factors were evaluated. Patients in the HT group had significantly less sarcopenia, a significantly larger body mass index, were significantly older, and significantly more likely to have a regular doctor and primary site in the body and tail of the pancreas than those in the non-HT group. Although no significant difference was found in the treatment response, patients in the HT group were significantly more likely to move to second-line chemotherapy than those in the non-HT group. Survival curves showed that median overall survival (OS) in the HT group was significantly longer (10.5 months) than in the non-HT group (6.8 months, P = .04). Multivariate analysis did not identify the use of antihypertensive drugs as an independent prognostic factor of OS. We identified key baseline differences in the characteristics of APC patients with and without HT, suggesting that major selection bias could occur when investigating the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in all populations. Therefore, it is possible that antihypertensive drugs lack antitumor activity. To determine the true efficacy of antihypertensive drugs for APC, HT, and non-HT patients in another population should be investigated, or a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted that is stratified by HT or non-HT status.