Dataset Information

Braking performance oriented multi-objective optimal design of electro-mechanical brake parameters.

ABSTRACT: Excellent braking performance is the premise of safe driving, and improve the braking performance by upgrading structures and optimizing parameters of braking systems has become the pursuit of engineers. With the development of autonomous driving and intelligent connected vehicle, new structural schemes such as electro-mechanical brakes (EMBs) have become the future of vehicle braking systems. Meanwhile, many scholars have dedicated to the research on the parameters optimization of braking systems. While, most of the studies focus on reducing the brake size and weight, improving the brake responses by optimizing the parameters, almost not involving the braking performance, and the optimization variables are relatively single. On these foundations, a multi-objective optimal design of EMB parameters is proposed to enhance the vehicle's braking performance. Its objectives and constraints were defined based on relevant standards and regulations. Subsequently, the decision variables were set, and optimal math model was established. Furthermore, the co-simulation platform was constructed, and the optimal design and simulation analyses factoring in the crucial structural and control parameters were performed. The results confirmed that the maximum braking pressure response time of the EMB is decreased by approximately 0.3 s, the stopping distance (SD) of 90 km/h-0 is shortened by about 3.44 m. Moreover, the mean fully developed deceleration (MFDD) is increased by 0.002 g, and the lateral displacement of the body (LD) is reduced by about 0.037 m. Hence, the vehicle braking performance is improved.

SUBMITTER: Wu T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8133414 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Accurate and reliable predictions of bacterial growth and metabolism from unstructured kinetic models are critical to the proper operation and design of engineered biological treatment and remediation systems. As such, parameter estimation has progressed into a routine challenge in the field of Environmental Engineering. Among the main issues identified with parameter estimation, the model-data calibration approach is a crucial, yet an often overlooked and difficult optimization problem. Here, a novel and rigorous global, multi objective, and fully Bayesian optimization approach that overcomes challenges associated with multi-variate, sparse and noisy data, as well as highly non-linear model structures commonly encountered in Environmental Engineering practice is presented. This optimization approach allows an improved definition and targeting of the compromise solution space for all multivariate problems, allowing efficient convergence, and a Bayesian component to thoroughly explore parameter and model prediction uncertainty. This global optimization approach outperformed, in terms of parameter accuracy and precision, standard, local non-linear regression routines and overcomes issues associated with premature convergence and addresses overfitting of different variables in the calibration process. •A sequential single, multi-objective, and Bayesian optimization workflow was developed to accurately and reliably estimate unstructured kinetic model parameters.•The global, single objective approach defines the global optimum (the best compromise solution) and "extreme" parameter solutions for each variable, while the global, multi-objective approach confirms the "best" compromise solution space for the Bayesian search to target and convergence is assessed using the single objective results.•The Approximate Bayesian Computational approach fully explores parameter and model prediction uncertainty targeting the compromise solution space previously identified.

Project description:BackgroundResidency programs select medical students for interviews and employment using metrics such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, grade-point average (GPA), and class rank/quartile. It is unclear whether these metrics predict performance as an intern. This study tested the hypothesis that performance on these metrics would predict intern performance.MethodsThis single institution, retrospective cohort analysis included 244 graduates from four classes (2015-2018) who completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) certified internship and were evaluated by program directors (PDs) at the end of the year. PDs provided a global assessment rating and ratings addressing ACGME competencies (response rate = 47%) with five response options: excellent = 5, very good = 4, acceptable = 3, marginal = 2, unacceptable = 1. PDs also classified interns as outstanding = 4, above average = 3, average = 2, and below average = 1 relative to other interns from the same residency program. Mean USMLE scores (Step 1 and Step 2CK), third-year GPA, class rank, and core competency ratings were compared using Welch's ANOVA and follow-up pairwise t-tests.ResultsBetter performance on PD evaluations at the end of intern year was associated with higher USMLE Step 1 (p = 0.006), Step 2CK (p = 0.030), medical school GPA (p = 0.020) and class rank (p = 0.016). Interns rated as average had lower USMLE scores, GPA, and class rank than those rated as above average or outstanding; there were no significant differences between above average and outstanding interns. Higher rating in each of the ACGME core competencies was associated with better intern performance (p < 0.01).ConclusionsBetter performance as an intern was associated with higher USMLE scores, medical school GPA and class rank. When USMLE Step 1 reporting changes from numeric scores to pass/fail, residency programs can use other metrics to select medical students for interviews and employment.

Dataset Information

Braking performance oriented multi-objective optimal design of electro-mechanical brake parameters.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure