Dataset Information

The Role of Ablation in Prevention of Recurrent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Shocks in Patients With Tetralogy of Fallot.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in preventing arrhythmic sudden cardiac death in patients with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). Although ICD therapies for malignant ventricular arrhythmias can be life-saving, shocks could have deleterious consequences. Substrate-based ablation therapy has become the standard of care to prevent recurrent ICD shocks in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. However, the efficacy and safety of this invasive therapy in the prevention of recurrent ICD shocks in patients with TOF has not been well evaluated.

Methods

Records of a total of 47 consecutive TOF patients (mean age: 43.1 ± 13.2 years, male sex: n = 34 [72.3%]) who underwent ICD implantation for secondary prevention between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed.

Results

Twenty (42.6%) patients underwent invasive therapy (radiofrequency catheter ablation, n = 8; surgical ablation with pulmonary valve replacement, n = 12) before ICD implantation. Twenty-seven patients (57.4%) were managed noninvasively. During follow-up (median 80.5 [interquartile range, 28.5-131.0] months), 2 (10.0%) patients in the invasive group and 10 (37.0%) patients in the noninvasive group received appropriate ICD shocks (P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis showed that invasive therapy was associated with a decreased risk of ICD shocks by 81.1% (odds ratio, 0.189; 95% confidence interval, 0.036-0.990; P = 0.049). Furthermore, invasive therapy was associated with decreased risk of the composite outcomes of ICD shock, death, cardiac transplantation, and hospital admission (odds ratio, 0.090; 95% confidence interval, 0.025-0.365; P = 0.013) compared with noninvasive therapy.

Conclusions

Invasive substrate modification therapy was associated with a lower likelihood of ICD shocks and improvement of long-term outcomes in TOF patients.

SUBMITTER: Kawada S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8134918 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThis study sought to test specialized processing of laser Doppler signals for discriminating ventricular fibrillation (VF) from common causes of inappropriate therapies.BackgroundInappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies remain a clinically important problem associated with morbidity and mortality. Tissue perfusion biomarkers, implemented to assist automated diagnosis of VF, sometimes mistake artifacts and random noise for perfusion, which could lead to shocks being inappropriately withheld.MethodsThe study tested a novel processing algorithm that combines electrogram data and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring as a method for assessing circulatory status. Fifty patients undergoing VF induction during ICD implantation were recruited. Noninvasive laser Doppler and continuous electrograms were recorded during both sinus rhythm and VF. Two additional scenarios that might have led to inappropriate shocks were simulated for each patient: ventricular lead fracture and T-wave oversensing. The laser Doppler was analyzed using 3 methods for reducing noise: 1) running mean; 2) oscillatory height; and 3) a novel quantification of electromechanical coupling which gates laser Doppler relative to electrograms. In addition, the algorithm was tested during exercise-induced sinus tachycardia.ResultsOnly the electromechanical coupling algorithm found a clear perfusion cut off between sinus rhythm and VF (sensitivity and specificity of 100%). Sensitivity and specificity remained at 100% during simulated lead fracture and electrogram oversensing. (Area under the curve running mean: 0.91; oscillatory height: 0.86; electromechanical coupling: 1.00). Sinus tachycardia did not cause false positive results.ConclusionsQuantifying the coupling between electrical and perfusion signals increases reliability of discrimination between VF and artifacts that ICDs may interpret as VF. Incorporating such methods into future ICDs may safely permit reductions of inappropriate shocks.

Project description:Background One third of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients receive appropriate therapy, but all remain at risk of defibrillator complications. Information on these complications in contemporary cohorts is limited. This study assessed complications and their risk factors after defibrillator implantation in a Dutch nationwide prospective registry cohort and forecasts the potential reduction in complications under distinct scenarios of updated indication criteria. Methods and Results Complications in a prospective multicenter registry cohort of 1442 primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implant patients were classified as major or minor. The potential for reducing complications was derived from a newly developed prediction model of appropriate therapy to identify patients with a low probability of benefitting from the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. During a follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 2.0-2.6 years), 228 complications occurred in 195 patients (13.6%), with 113 patients (7.8%) experiencing at least one major complication. Most common ones were lead related (n=93) and infection (n=18). Minor complications occurred in 6.8% of patients, with lead-related (n=47) and pocket-related (n=40) complications as the most prevailing ones. A surgical reintervention or additional hospitalization was required in 53% or 61% of complications, respectively. Complications were strongly associated with device type. Application of stricter implant indication results in a comparable proportional reduction of (major) complications. Conclusions One in 13 patients experiences at least one major implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related complication, and many patients undergo a surgical reintervention. Complications are related to defibrillator implantations, and these should be discussed with the patient. Stricter implant indication criteria and careful selection of device type implanted may have significant clinical and financial benefits.