Dataset Information

Assessing measurement equivalence of the Danish and Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire using differential item and test functioning analysis.

ABSTRACT: Aims: The Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) measures distress, depression, anxiety and somatisation, facilitating the distinction between stress-related problems and psychiatric disorder in primary and occupational health care. The aim of the study was to examine the measurement equivalence across the Danish and Dutch 4DSQ. Methods: Danish 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Danish citizens on sick leave for mental-health problems. Dutch 4DSQ data were obtained from a cohort of Dutch employees on sick leave and a cohort of general practice attenders suspected of having mental-health problems. The study samples were matched on age and sex. The 4DSQ scales were assessed for essential unidimensionality using confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement equivalence of the 4DSQ across the groups was assessed using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis. Results: The study groups each consisted of 1363 people (63% female, M_age=42 years). The 4DSQ scales proved essentially unidimensional. DIF was detected in 20 items. In terms of Cohen's effect size, DIF was mostly small or moderate. In terms of effect size, the mean effect on the scale score (DTF) was negligible. Nevertheless, it is recommended to adjust some of the cut-off points for two Danish 4DSQ scales to retain the meaning of these cut-off points in Dutch respondents. Conclusions: The Danish version of the 4DSQ measures the same constructs as the original Dutch questionnaire. Twenty items functioned differently in Danish respondents than in Dutch respondents, but this had only a small impact on the scale scores.

SUBMITTER: Terluin B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8135249 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess differential item functioning (DIF) in an item pool measuring the mobility of hospitalized patients across educational, age, and sex groups.DesignMeasurement evaluation cohort study. Content experts generated DIF hypotheses to guide the interpretation. The graded response item response theory (IRT) model was used. Primary DIF tests were Wald statistics; sensitivity analyses were conducted using the IRT ordinal logistic regression procedure. Magnitude and impact were evaluated by examining group differences in expected item and scale score functions.SettingHospital-based rehabilitation.ParticipantsHospitalized patients (N=2216).InterventionsNot applicable.Main outcome measuresA total of 111 self-reported mobility items.ResultsTwo linking items among those used to set the metric across forms evidenced DIF for sex and age: "difficulty climbing stairs step-over-step without a handrail (alternating feet)" and "difficulty climbing 3-5 steps without a handrail." Conditional on the mobility state, the items were more difficult for women and older people (aged ≥65y). An additional 18 items were identified with DIF. Items with both high DIF magnitude and hypotheses related to age were difficulty "crossing road at a 4-lane traffic light with curbs," "jumping/landing on one leg," "strenuous activities," and "descending 3-5 steps with no handrail." Although DIF of higher magnitude was observed for several items, the scale-level effect was relatively small and the exposure rate for the most problematic items was low (0.35, 0.27, and 0.20).ConclusionsThis was the first study to evaluate measurement equivalence of the hospital-based rehabilitation mobility item bank. Although 20 items evidenced high magnitude DIF, 5 of which were related to stairs, the scale-level effect was minimal; however, it is recommended that such items be avoided in the development of short-form measures. No items with salient DIF were removed from calibrations, supporting the use of the item bank across groups differing in education, age, and sex. The bank may thus be useful to assist clinical assessment and decision-making regarding risk for specific mobility restrictions at discharge as well as identifying mobility-related functions targeted for postdischarge interventions. Additionally, with the goal of avoiding long and burdensome assessments for patients and clinical staff, these results could be informative for those using the item bank to construct short forms.

Project description:IntroductionThe outcomes anxiety and depression are measured frequently by healthcare providers to assess the impact of a disease, but with numerous instruments. PROMIS item banks provide an opportunity for standardized measurement. Cross-cultural validity of measures and the availability of reference values are prerequisites for standardized measurement.MethodsPROMIS Anxiety and Depression item banks were completed by 1002 representative Dutch persons. To evaluate cross-cultural validity, data from US participants in PROMIS wave 1 were used and differential item functioning (DIF) was investigated, using an iterative hybrid of logistic regression and item response theory. McFadden's pseudo R2-change of 2% was the critical threshold. The impact of any DIF on full item banks and short forms was investigated. To obtain Dutch reference values, T-scores for anxiety and depression were calculated for the complete Dutch sample, and age-group and gender subpopulations. Thresholds corresponding to normal limits, mild, moderate and severe symptoms were computed.ResultsIn both item banks, two items had DIF but with minimal impact on population level T-scores for full item banks and short forms. The Dutch general population had a T-score of 49.9 for anxiety and 49.6 for depression, similar to the T-scores of 50.0 of the US general population. T-scores for age-group and gender subpopulations were also similar to T-scores of the US general population. Thresholds for mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression were set to 55, 60 and 70, identical to US thresholds.ConclusionsThe limited number of items with DIF and its minimal impact, enables the use of standard (US) item parameters and comparisons of scores between Dutch and US populations. The Dutch reference values provide an important tool for healthcare professionals and researchers to evaluate and interpret symptoms of anxiety and depression, stimulating the uptake of PROMIS measures, and contributing to standardized outcome measurement.

Dataset Information

Assessing measurement equivalence of the Danish and Dutch Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire using differential item and test functioning analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets