Assessing Toxicokinetic Uncertainty and Variability in Risk Prioritization.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wambaugh JF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8136471 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and purpose - Low statistical power remains endemic in clinical medicine including orthopedics and manifests as high uncertainty and wide confidence intervals (CI). We evaluated the reporting and correspondence between power calculation and observed data on key parameters of variability and uncertainty in orthopedic randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Material and methods - RCTs with 1:1 allocation published in 8 major orthopedic journals between 2016 and 2017 with one continuous primary outcome were included in the review. The components of power calculation and observed standard deviation (SD), mean difference (MD), and confidence interval (CI) of MD between groups were assessed for primary outcome.Results - 160 RCTs were included, of which 93 (58%) and 138 (86%) studies reported the estimated SD and MD in the power calculation, respectively. The median ratio of the estimated SD and SDs observed in the data was 1.0 (IQR -0.76 to 1.32) for 69 (43%) studies. Only 31 of 138 studies reported the CI of MD in primary outcome. In 42% of the negative studies, the estimated MD was included in the CI of the observed MD.Interpretation - The key parameters of data variability, both in power analyses and in final study results, were poorly reported. Low power in orthopedics may result from too high an estimated effect size due to an overoptimistic estimate of MD between study groups. In almost half of the studies, overlap of the CI of the observed MD and estimated MD suggested that the reported results of these studies were inconclusive.
| S-EPMC8023899 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Coastal urban infrastructure and water management programs are vulnerable to the impacts of long-term hydroclimatic changes and to the flooding and physical destruction of disruptive hurricanes and storm surge. Water resilience or, inversely, vulnerability depends on design specifications of the storm and inundation, against which water infrastructure and environmental assets are planned and operated. These design attributes are commonly derived from statistical modeling of historical measurements. Here we argue for the need to carefully examine the approach and associated design vulnerability in coastal areas because of the future hydroclimatic changes and large variability at local coastal watersheds. This study first shows significant spatiotemporal variations of design storm in the Chesapeake Bay of the eastern U.S. Atlantic coast, where the low-frequency high-intensity precipitations vary differently to the tropical cyclones and local orographic effects. Average and gust wind speed exhibited much greater spatial but far less temporal variability than the precipitation. It is noteworthy that these local variabilities are not fully described by the regional gridded precipitation used in CMIP5 climate downscaling and by NOAA's regional design guide Atlas-14. Up to 46.4% error in the gridded precipitation for the calibration period 1950-1999 is further exacerbated in the future design values by the ensemble of 132 CMIP5 projections. The total model projection error (δM) up to -61.8% primarily comes from the precipitation regionalization (δ1), climate downscaling (δ2), and a fraction from empirical data modeling (δE). Thus, a post-bias correction technique is necessary. The bias-corrected design wind speed for 10-yr to 30-yr storms has small changes <20% by the year 2100, but contains large spatial variations even for stations of close proximity. Bias-corrected design precipitations are characteristic of large spatial variability and a notable increase of 2-5 year precipitation in the future along western shores of the Lower and Middle Chesapeake Bay. All these accounts point to the potential vulnerability of water infrastructure and water program in coastal areas, when the hydrological design basis using regional values fails to account for significant spatiotemporal precipitation variations in local coastal watersheds.
| S-EPMC7487976 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The thousands of chemicals present in the environment (USGAO, 2013) must be triaged to identify priority chemicals for human health risk research. Most chemicals have little of the toxicokinetic (TK) data that are necessary for relating exposures to tissue concentrations that are believed to be toxic. Ongoing efforts have collected limited, in vitro TK data for a few hundred chemicals. These data have been combined with biomonitoring data to estimate an approximate margin between potential hazard and exposure. The most "at risk" 95th percentile of adults have been identified from simulated populations that are generated either using standard "average" adult human parameters or very specific cohorts such as Northern Europeans. To better reflect the modern U.S. population, we developed a population simulation using physiologies based on distributions of demographic and anthropometric quantities from the most recent U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. This allowed incorporation of inter-individual variability, including variability across relevant demographic subgroups. Variability was analyzed with a Monte Carlo approach that accounted for the correlation structure in physiological parameters. To identify portions of the U.S. population that are more at risk for specific chemicals, physiologic variability was incorporated within an open-source high-throughput (HT) TK modeling framework. We prioritized 50 chemicals based on estimates of both potential hazard and exposure. Potential hazard was estimated from in vitro HT screening assays (i.e., the Tox21 and ToxCast programs). Bioactive in vitro concentrations were extrapolated to doses that produce equivalent concentrations in body tissues using a reverse dosimetry approach in which generic TK models are parameterized with: 1) chemical-specific parameters derived from in vitro measurements and predicted from chemical structure; and 2) with physiological parameters for a virtual population. For risk-based prioritization of chemicals, predicted bioactive equivalent doses were compared to demographic-specific inferences of exposure rates that were based on NHANES urinary analyte biomonitoring data. The inclusion of NHANES-derived inter-individual variability decreased predicted bioactive equivalent doses by 12% on average for the total population when compared to previous methods. However, for some combinations of chemical and demographic groups the margin was reduced by as much as three quarters. This TK modeling framework allows targeted risk prioritization of chemicals for demographic groups of interest, including potentially sensitive life stages and subpopulations.
| S-EPMC6116525 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a group of fluorinated substances of interest to researchers, regulators, and the public due to their widespread presence in the environment. A few PFASs have comparatively extensive amounts of human epidemiological, exposure, and experimental animal toxicity data (e.g., perfluorooctanoic acid), whereas little toxicity and exposure information exists for much of the broader set of PFASs. Given that traditional approaches to generate toxicity information are resource intensive, new approach methods, including in vitro high-throughput toxicity (HTT) testing, are being employed to inform PFAS hazard characterization and further (in vivo) testing. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) are collaborating to develop a risk-based approach for conducting PFAS toxicity testing to facilitate PFAS human health assessments. This article describes the construction of a PFAS screening library and the process by which a targeted subset of 75 PFASs were selected. Multiple factors were considered, including interest to the U.S. EPA, compounds within targeted categories, structural diversity, exposure considerations, procurability and testability, and availability of existing toxicity data. Generating targeted HTT data for PFASs represents a new frontier for informing priority setting. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4555.
| S-EPMC6378680 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study region: The Zambezi River basin, one of the most important water resources in sub-Saharan Africa from both a water supply and hydro-power generation perspective.Study focus: Calibration of two hydrological models (Pitman and WEAP) that have been established for 76 sub-basins covering the total basin area of about 1 350 000 km2. The longer-term purpose of establishing the models is to facilitate scenario analyses of future conditions related to changes in water use and management as well as climate change.New hydrological insights for the region: While there are many (inevitable) uncertainties in the data used, as well as the models and calibrated parameter sets themselves, the results suggest that the models are generally fit for purpose in terms of evaluating future changes. There are, however, some parts of the basin where the reduction of identified uncertainties would lead to improved models and greater confidence in their future use. One of sources of uncertainty relates to the existence of several large wetland areas that have impacts on downstream flows, but are difficult to simulate due to the relatively poor existing understanding of the dynamics of water exchange between the river channels and the wetland storage areas.
| S-EPMC7756318 | biostudies-literature
Project description:When the in/consistency in Pairwise Comparisons (PCs) is taken into consideration as the subarea of the Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) scientific field, it has many repercussions in various types of research areas including different modelling scenarios e.g. reduction of inconsistency during PCs, deriving appropriate consistency thresholds for inconsistent Pairwise Comparison Matrices (PCMs), completing of incomplete PCMs, aggregating of individual PCMs in relation to Group Decision Making (GDM) aspects, and PCMs in/consistency relation to credibility of Priority Vectors (PV) derived from PCMs with the application of various Priorities Deriving Methods (PDMs). The examination objective in the latter area of research is the uncertainty related to the inexactitude of prioritization based on derived PVs. However, only few research studies examine this problem from the perspective of PCM applicability for credible designation of decision maker's (DM) priorities in the way that leads to minimization of the prioritization uncertainty related to possible, and sometimes very probable, ranking fluctuations. This problem constitutes the primary area of interest for this research paper as no research study was thus far identified that examines this problem from the perspective of consistent PCMs. Hence, a research gap was identified. Thus, the objective of this research paper is to fill in this scientific gap. The research findings have serious repercussions in relation to prioritization quality with the application of PCs methodology, mostly in relation to the interpretation and reliability evaluation of prioritization results. Firstly, the research study outcome changes the perspective of the rank reversal phenomenon, which shed new light on many research studies that have been presented in the subject's literature for many decades. Secondly, the research study results throw new light on the discussion concerning the fuzziness of AHP's results. Last but not least, the effect of the research opens the unique opportunity to evaluate the prioritization outcome obtained within the process of consistent PCs from the well-known perspective of statistical hypothesis testing i.e. the probability designation of the chance that accepted ranking results which were considered as correct due to low probability of change may be incorrect, hence they should be rejected, and the probability designation of the chance that rejected ranking results which were considered as incorrect due to high probability of change may be correct and should be accepted. The paramount finding of the research is the fact that consistent PCMs provide PVs, which elements cannot be considered as established, but only approximated within certain confidence intervals estimated with a certain level of probability. As problems related to heuristics can be analyzed only via a computer simulation process, because they cannot be mathematically determined, the problem examined in this research paper is examined via Monte Carlo simulations, appropriately coded and executed with the application of Wolfram's Mathematica Software. It is believed that this research findings should be very important and useful for all decision makers and researchers during their problems' examinations that relate to prioritization processes with the application of PCs methodology.
| S-EPMC10490963 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Uncertainty is intrinsic to perception. Neural circuits which process sensory information must therefore also represent the reliability of this information. How they do so is a topic of debate. We propose a model of visual cortex in which average neural response strength encodes stimulus features, while cross-neuron variability in response gain encodes the uncertainty of these features. To test this model, we studied spiking activity of neurons in macaque V1 and V2 elicited by repeated presentations of stimuli whose uncertainty was manipulated in distinct ways. We show that gain variability of individual neurons is tuned to stimulus uncertainty, that this tuning is specific to the features encoded by these neurons and largely invariant to the source of uncertainty. We demonstrate that this behavior naturally arises from known gain-control mechanisms, and illustrate how downstream circuits can jointly decode stimulus features and their uncertainty from sensory population activity.
| S-EPMC7237668 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Using mostly theoretical models and traditional risk/uncertainty measures (VIX index, panic, precaution, scary bad news, etc.), the current literature tries to clarify the risk/uncertainty-deleveraging pattern. The findings are not sufficient to explain the dynamic empirical relationship between modern risk/uncertainty indicators and leverage. We fill this gap in the literature by using US quarterly data, from 1985:1 to 2018:4, Granger causality tests, and a structural vector autoregression model. We find that commercial bank leverage rises when geopolitical risk and macroeconomic, policy, and equity uncertainty increase. Client-based business relationships of banks and high government borrowing from banks during crises periods are responsible for this relationship. We find that the leverage of broker-dealers and shadow banks declines when Chicago risk and macroeconomic, policy, financial, and equity uncertainty increase. We argue that the vulnerability of broker-dealers and shadow banks to the risk/uncertainty of the entire market system is responsible for this relationship.
| S-EPMC7317297 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) is a global initiative intended to improve drug proarrhythmia risk assessment using a new paradigm of mechanistic assays. Under the CiPA paradigm, the relative risk of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes (TdP) is assessed using an in silico model of the human ventricular action potential (AP) that integrates in vitro pharmacology data from multiple ion channels. Thus, modeling predictions of cardiac risk liability will depend critically on the variability in pharmacology data, and uncertainty quantification (UQ) must comprise an essential component of the in silico assay. This study explores UQ methods that may be incorporated into the CiPA framework. Recently, we proposed a promising in silico TdP risk metric (qNet), which is derived from AP simulations and allows separation of a set of CiPA training compounds into Low, Intermediate, and High TdP risk categories. The purpose of this study was to use UQ to evaluate the robustness of TdP risk separation by qNet. Uncertainty in the model parameters used to describe drug binding and ionic current block was estimated using the non-parametric bootstrap method and a Bayesian inference approach. Uncertainty was then propagated through AP simulations to quantify uncertainty in qNet for each drug. UQ revealed lower uncertainty and more accurate TdP risk stratification by qNet when simulations were run at concentrations below 5× the maximum therapeutic exposure (Cmax). However, when drug effects were extrapolated above 10× Cmax, UQ showed that qNet could no longer clearly separate drugs by TdP risk. This was because for most of the pharmacology data, the amount of current block measured was <60%, preventing reliable estimation of IC50-values. The results of this study demonstrate that the accuracy of TdP risk prediction depends both on the intrinsic variability in ion channel pharmacology data as well as on experimental design considerations that preclude an accurate determination of drug IC50-values in vitro. Thus, we demonstrate that UQ provides valuable information about in silico modeling predictions that can inform future proarrhythmic risk evaluation of drugs under the CiPA paradigm.
| S-EPMC5702340 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Providing reliable environmental quality standards (EQSs) is a challenging issue in environmental risk assessment (ERA). These EQSs are derived from toxicity endpoints estimated from dose-response models to identify and characterize the environmental hazard of chemical compounds released by human activities. These toxicity endpoints include the classical x% effect/lethal concentrations at a specific time t (EC/LC(x, t)) and the new multiplication factors applied to environmental exposure profiles leading to x% effect reduction at a specific time t (MF(x, t), or denoted LP(x, t) by the EFSA). However, classical dose-response models used to estimate toxicity endpoints have some weaknesses, such as their dependency on observation time points, which are likely to differ between species (e.g., experiment duration). Furthermore, real-world exposure profiles are rarely constant over time, which makes the use of classical dose-response models difficult and may prevent the derivation of MF(x, t). When dealing with survival or immobility toxicity test data, these issues can be overcome with the use of the general unified threshold model of survival (GUTS), a toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) model that provides an explicit framework to analyse both time- and concentration-dependent data sets as well as obtain a mechanistic derivation of EC/LC(x, t) and MF(x, t) regardless of x and at any time t of interest. In ERA, the assessment of a risk is inherently built upon probability distributions, such that the next critical step is to characterize the uncertainties of toxicity endpoints and, consequently, those of EQSs. With this perspective, we investigated the use of a Bayesian framework to obtain the uncertainties from the calibration process and to propagate them to model predictions, including LC(x, t) and MF(x, t) derivations. We also explored the mathematical properties of LC(x, t) and MF(x, t) as well as the impact of different experimental designs to provide some recommendations for a robust derivation of toxicity endpoints leading to reliable EQSs: avoid computing LC(x, t) and MF(x, t) for extreme x values (0 or 100%), where uncertainty is maximal; compute MF(x, t) after a long period of time to take depuration time into account and test survival under pulses with different periods of time between them.
| S-EPMC6685980 | biostudies-literature