Dataset Information

Caliper navigation for craniotomy planning of convexity targets.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A technique to localize a radiological target on the head convexity fast and with acceptable precision is sufficient for surgeries of superficial intracranial lesions, and of help in the setting of emergency surgery, computer navigation breakdown, limited resources and education. We present a caliper technique based on fundamental geometry, with inexpensive and globally available tools (conventional CT or MRI image viewer, calculator, caliper).

Methods

The distances of the radiological target from two landmarks (nasion and porus acusticus externus) are assessed with an image viewer and Pythagoras' theorem. The two distances are then marked around the landmarks onto the head of the patient with help of a caliper. The intersection defines the target. We tested the technique in a saw bone skull model and afterwards in the operating room. Convexity targets were localized with the caliper navigation technique and then with computer navigation as ground truth.

Results

In the saw bone model, the mean offset between the caliper navigated target and the real target was 2.9 ± 2.8 mm, 95% CI (1.6 mm; 4.2 mm). The mean offset between computer navigated target and real target was 1.6 ± 0.9 mm, 95% CI (1.2 mm; 2 mm) (ns). In 15 patients undergoing navigated cranial procedures, 100 targets were assessed in reference to computer navigation. The mean offset of the caliper navigation was 11 ± 5.2 mm, 95% CI (9.9 mm; 12 mm).

Conclusion

This is a low-tech approach for translation of a radiological target to the patient's head in short time and with globally available inexpensive tools, with satisfying precision for many procedures.

SUBMITTER: Jagersberg M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8136664 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCurrent automated planning solutions are calibrated using trial and error or machine learning on historical datasets. Neither method allows for the intuitive exploration of differing trade-off options during calibration, which may aid in ensuring automated solutions align with clinical preference. Pareto navigation provides this functionality and offers a potential calibration alternative. The purpose of this study was to validate an automated radiotherapy planning solution with a novel multi-dimensional Pareto navigation calibration interface across two external institutions for prostate cancer.MethodsThe implemented 'Pareto Guided Automated Planning' (PGAP) methodology was developed in RayStation using scripting and consisted of a Pareto navigation calibration interface built upon a 'Protocol Based Automatic Iterative Optimisation' planning framework. 30 previous patients were randomly selected by each institution (IA and IB), 10 for calibration and 20 for validation. Utilising the Pareto navigation interface automated protocols were calibrated to the institutions' clinical preferences. A single automated plan (VMATAuto) was generated for each validation patient with plan quality compared against the previously treated clinical plan (VMATClinical) both quantitatively, using a range of DVH metrics, and qualitatively through blind review at the external institution.ResultsPGAP led to marked improvements across the majority of rectal dose metrics, with Dmean reduced by 3.7 Gy and 1.8 Gy for IA and IB respectively (p < 0.001). For bladder, results were mixed with low and intermediate dose metrics reduced for IB but increased for IA. Differences, whilst statistically significant (p < 0.05) were small and not considered clinically relevant. The reduction in rectum dose was not at the expense of PTV coverage (D98% was generally improved with VMATAuto), but was somewhat detrimental to PTV conformality. The prioritisation of rectum over conformality was however aligned with preferences expressed during calibration and was a key driver in both institutions demonstrating a clear preference towards VMATAuto, with 31/40 considered superior to VMATClinical upon blind review.ConclusionsPGAP enabled intuitive adaptation of automated protocols to an institution's planning aims and yielded plans more congruent with the institution's clinical preference than the locally produced manual clinical plans.