Dataset Information

Metabolic comorbidities and the association with risks of recurrent metastatic disease in breast cancer survivors.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Obesity and other metabolic comorbidities affect over 10% of patients with breast cancer and are closely related with adverse outcomes. Although metabolic comorbidities among breast cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries are suggested to be lower, only a few studies are currently available. Effective management of metabolic comorbidities in cancer patients has been associated with better outcomes.

Methods

Non-metastatic breast cancer patients (N = 1081) treated in our department (2014-2018) were monitored for the presence of high Body Mass Index (BMI), diabetes or glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension and the development of recurrent metastatic diseases during a median follow-up of 3.9 years.

Results

Glucose intolerance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and BMI ≥ 27.7 kg/m² considered at risk for metabolic comorbidities were found in 26.5, 42.6, 27.7, and 23.3% of breast cancer patients, respectively. Diabetes or glucose intolerance and having both glucose intolerance and dyslipidemia were associated with the risk of recurrent metastatic disease (OR = 1.442, 95%CI = 1.071-1.943, p = 0.016 and OR = 1.495, 95%CI = 1.090-2.049, p = 0.010; respectively). Having three or more metabolic comorbidities was significantly associated with the risk of recurrent metastatic disease (OR = 1.647, 95%CI = 1.139-2.382, p = 0.008) compared to patients without any comorbidity. The metabolic comorbidities were distributed unevenly among breast cancer subtypes. A significant association with recurrent metastatic disease was found in the Luminal B-like subtype. In post-menopausal patients, having more than three comorbidities was associated with a higher risk of recurrent metastatic disease compared to those without any comorbidity (OR = 2.000, 95%CI = 1.035-3.067, p = 0.001). The risks of having three or more metabolic comorbidities were significantly higher in breast cancer survivors who were obese, lived in an urban area, and received hormonal therapy of aromatase inhibitors.

Conclusion

Metabolic comorbidities were frequently found in breast cancer patients and were associated with higher risks to develop recurrent metastatic disease, particularly in post-menopausal women. Subsequent larger studies are needed to better understand the association of metabolic comorbidities with patients' quality of life and prognosis, and to explore the potential combination of clinical intervention and lifestyle modification in breast cancer survivors to treat as well as reduce their impact.

SUBMITTER: Anwar SL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8141199 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBiomarker discrepancy between primary and recurrent/metastatic breast cancer is well known, however its impact on prognosis and treatment after relapse is still unclear. Current study aims to evaluate biomarkers discrepancy between primary and recurrent/metastatic lesions as well as to investigate its association with following treatment pattern and disease outcome.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively included consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing surgery in our center from Jan. 2009 to Dec. 2016 and reported disease recurrence. Patients with re-biopsy and paired biomarkers statuses on primary and recurrent/metastatic lesions were further analyzed. Kappa test was used to analyze the concordance rate of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) was compared between subgroups by Kaplan-Meier curve. Cox regression model was applied to identify impact factors for PRS.ResultsA total of 156 patients were finally included, of whom 70 and 86 had loco-regional and distant recurrence, respectively. Concordance rates of ER, PR and HER2 were 83.3%, 66.7%, and 97.1%, respectively, which was similarly distributed among different recurrent sites (all P > 0.05). Primary ER-positivity (vs ER-negativity, P = 0.014) and loco-regional recurrence (vs distant metastasis, P = 0.001) were independently associated with superior PRS, while patients with visceral metastasis (P < 0.001) had the worst disease outcome. Hormone receptor/HER2 status discrepancy was observed in 28 patients. Fifteen of them changed systemic treatment based on biomarker statuses of recurrent lesion, however, their PRS was not improved compared to those 13 patients who continued the same treatment according to primary biomarkers statuses (P = 0.298).ConclusionBiomarker discrepancy was observed between primary and recurrent/metastatic breast cancer lesions and had certain influence on treatment strategies after relapse. However, its impact on disease outcome wasn't established in the current study, which deserves further evaluation.

Project description:We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients.Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007-2009 in eight hospitals in the Southeast of the Netherlands were included and categorised based on MFI. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of de novo metastatic breast cancer vs recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MFI ⩽24 months and >24 months), adjusted for age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, initial site of metastasis and use of prior (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy.Eight hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided in three subgroups based on MFI; 154 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer, 176 patients with MFI <24 months and 485 patients with MFI >24 months. Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a prolonged survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI <24 months (median 29.4 vs 9.1 months, P<0.0001), but no difference in survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months (median, 29.4 vs 27.9 months, P=0.73). Adjusting for other prognostic factors, patients with MFI <24 months had increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.49-2.60, P<0.0001) compared with patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. When comparing recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months with de novo metastatic breast cancer no significant difference in mortality risk was found. The association between MFI and survival was seen irrespective of use of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy.Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with MFI <24 months, irrespective of the use of prior adjuvant systemic therapy in the latter group. However, compared with patients with MFI >24 months, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had similar outcome.