Pleomorphic carcinoma of the lung: Prognostic models of semantic, radiomics and combined features from CT and PET/CT in 85 patients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
To demonstrate semantic, radiomics, and the combined risk models related to the prognoses of pulmonary pleomorphic carcinomas (PCs).Methods
We included 85 patients (M:F = 71:14; age, 35-88 [mean, 63 years]) whose imaging features were divided into training (n = 60) and test (n = 25) sets. Nineteen semantic and 142 radiomics features related to tumors were computed. Semantic risk score (SRS) model was built using the Cox-least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach. Radiomics risk score (RRS) from CT and PET features and combined risk score (CRS) adopting both semantic and radiomics features were also constructed. Risk groups were stratified by the median of the risk scores of the training set. Survival analysis was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier plots.Results
Of 85 PCs, adenocarcinoma was the most common epithelial component found in 63 (73 %) tumors. In SRS model, four features were stratified into high- and low-risk groups (HR, 4.119; concordance index ([C-index], 0.664) in the test set. In RRS model, five features helped improve the stratification (HR, 3.716; C-index, 0.591) and in CRS model, three features helped perform the best stratification (HR, 4.795; C-index, 0.617). The two significant features of CRS models were the SUVmax and the histogram feature of energy ([CT Firstorder Energy]).Conclusion
In PCs of the lungs, the combined model leveraging semantic and radiomics features provides a better prognosis compared to using semantic and radiomics features separately. The high SUVmax of solid portion (CT Firstorder Energy) of tumors is associated with poor prognosis in lung PCs.
SUBMITTER: Kim C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8141891 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose: This study aimed to compare the performance of radiomics and deep learning in predicting EGFR mutation status in patients with lung cancer based on PET/CT images, and tried to explore a model with excellent prediction performance to accurately predict EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Method: PET/CT images of 194 NSCLC patients from Xijing Hospital were collected and divided into a training set and a validation set according to the ratio of 7:3. Statistics were made on patients' clinical characteristics, and a large number of features were extracted based on their PET/CT images (4306 radiomics features and 2048 deep learning features per person) with the pyradiomics toolkit and 3D convolutional neural network. Then a radiomics model (RM), a deep learning model (DLM), and a hybrid model (HM) were established. The performance of the three models was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curves. In addition, a nomogram based on a deep learning score (DS) and the most significant clinical characteristic was plotted. Result: In the training set composed of 138 patients (64 with EGFR mutation and 74 without EGFR mutation), the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HM (0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) was higher than that of RM (0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.89) and DLM (0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95). In the validation set composed of 57 patients (32 with EGFR mutation and 25 without EGFR mutation), the AUC of HM (0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.93) was also higher than that of RM (0.68, 95% CI: 0.52-0.84) and DLM (0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). In all, HM achieved better diagnostic performance in predicting EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients than two other models. Conclusion: Our study showed that the deep learning model based on PET/CT images had better performance than radiomics model in diagnosing EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients based on PET/CT images. Combined with the most statistically significant clinical characteristic (smoking) and deep learning features, our hybrid model had better performance in predicting EGFR mutation types of patients than two other models, which could enable NSCLC patients to choose more personalized treatment schemes.
| S-EPMC9092283 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: This study investigated the performance of ensemble learning holomic models for the detection of breast cancer, receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes from [18F]FDG-PET/CT images with and without incorporating data pre-processing algorithms. Additionally, machine learning (ML) models were compared with conventional data analysis using standard uptake value lesion classification. Methods: A cohort of 170 patients with 173 breast cancer tumors (132 malignant, 38 benign) was examined with [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Breast tumors were segmented and radiomic features were extracted following the imaging biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) guidelines combined with optimized feature extraction. Ensemble learning including five supervised ML algorithms was utilized in a 100-fold Monte Carlo (MC) cross-validation scheme. Data pre-processing methods were incorporated prior to machine learning, including outlier and borderline noisy sample detection, feature selection, and class imbalance correction. Feature importance in each model was assessed by calculating feature occurrence by the R-squared method across MC folds. Results: Cross validation demonstrated high performance of the cancer detection model (80% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 80% accuracy, 0.81 area under the curve (AUC)), and of the triple negative tumor identification model (85% sensitivity, 78% specificity, 82% accuracy, 0.82 AUC). The individual receptor status and luminal A/B subtype models yielded low performance (0.46-0.68 AUC). SUVmax model yielded 0.76 AUC in cancer detection and 0.70 AUC in predicting triple negative subtype. Conclusions: Predictive models based on [18F]FDG-PET/CT images in combination with advanced data pre-processing steps aid in breast cancer diagnosis and in ML-based prediction of the aggressive triple negative breast cancer subtype.
| S-EPMC8000810 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare 2D and 3D radiomics features prognostic performance differences in CT images of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodWe enrolled 588 NSCLC patients from three independent cohorts. Two sets of 463 patients from two different institutes were used as the training cohort. The remaining cohort with 125 patients was set as the validation cohort. A total of 1014 radiomics features (507 2D features and 507 3D features correspondingly) were assessed. Based on the dichotomized survival data, 2D and 3D radiomics indicators were calculated for each patient by trained classifiers. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to assess the prediction performance of trained classifiers (the support vector machine and logistic regression). Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard survival analyses were also employed. Harrell's concordance index (C-Index) and Akaike's information criteria (AIC) were applied to assess the trained models.ResultsRadiomics indicators were built and compared by AUCs. In the training cohort, 2D_AUC=0.653, 3D_AUC=0.671. In the validation cohort, 2D_AUC=0.755, 3D_AUC=0.663. Both 2D and 3D trained indicators achieved significant results (P<.05) in the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. In the validation cohort, 2D Cox model had a C-Index=0.683 and AIC=789.047; 3D Cox model obtained a C-Index=0.632 and AIC=799.409.ConclusionBoth 2D and 3D CT radiomics features have a certain prognostic ability in NSCLC, but 2D features showed better performance in our tests. Considering the cost of the radiomics features calculation, 2D features are more recommended for use in the current study.
| S-EPMC5605492 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the ability of 18 fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) metrics and radiomics features (RFs) in predicting the final diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN). We retrospectively recruited 202 patients who underwent a 18F-FDG-PET/CT before any treatment in two PET scanners. After volumetric segmentation of each lung nodule, 8 PET metrics and 42 RFs were extracted. All the features were tested for significant differences between the two PET scanners. The performances of all features in predicting the nature of SPN were analyzed by testing three classes of final logistic regression predictive models: two were built/trained through exploiting the separate data from the two scanners, and the other joined the data together. One hundred and twenty-seven patients had a final diagnosis of malignancy, while 64 were of a benign nature. Comparing the two PET scanners, we found that all metabolic features and most of RFs were significantly different, despite the cross correlation being quite similar. For scanner 1, a combination between grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), histogram, and grey-level zone length matrix (GLZLM) related features presented the best performances to predict the diagnosis; for scanner 2, it was GLCM and histogram-related features and metabolic tumour volume (MTV); and for scanner 1 + 2, it was histogram features, standardized uptake value (SUV) metrics, and MTV. RFs had a significant role in predicting the diagnosis of SPN, but their accuracies were directly related to the scanner.
| S-EPMC8584460 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aims to construct radiomics models based on [18F]FDG PET/CT using multiple machine learning methods to predict the EGFR mutation status of lung adenocarcinoma and evaluate whether incorporating clinical parameters can improve the performance of radiomics models.MethodsA total of 515 patients were retrospectively collected and divided into a training set (n = 404) and an independent testing set (n = 111) according to their examination time. After semi-automatic segmentation of PET/CT images, the radiomics features were extracted, and the best feature sets of CT, PET, and PET/CT modalities were screened out. Nine radiomics models were constructed using logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) methods. According to the performance in the testing set, the best model of the three modalities was kept, and its radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. Furthermore, combined with the valuable clinical parameters (gender, smoking history, nodule type, CEA, SCC-Ag), a joint radiomics model was built.ResultsCompared with LR and SVM, the RF Rad-score showed the best performance among the three radiomics models of CT, PET, and PET/CT (training and testing sets AUC: 0.688, 0.666, and 0.698 vs. 0.726, 0.678, and 0.704). Among the three joint models, the PET/CT joint model performed the best (training and testing sets AUC: 0.760 vs. 0.730). The further stratified analysis found that CT_RF had the best prediction effect for stage I-II lesions (training set and testing set AUC: 0.791 vs. 0.797), while PET/CT joint model had the best prediction effect for stage III-IV lesions (training and testing sets AUC: 0.722 vs. 0.723).ConclusionsCombining with clinical parameters can improve the predictive performance of PET/CT radiomics model, especially for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
| S-EPMC10073367 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo investigate the value of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics signatures in combination with clinical and CT morphological features to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC).MethodsFrom February 2012 to October 2019, 608 patients were confirmed with LADC and underwent chest CT scans. Among them, 307 (50.5%) patients had a positive EGFR-mutation and 301 (49.5%) had a negative EGFR-mutation. Of the EGFR-mutant patients, 114 (37.1%) had a 19del -mutation, 155 (50.5%) had a L858R-mutation, and 38 (12.4%) had other rare mutations. Three combined models were generated by incorporating radiomics signatures, clinical, and CT morphological features to predict EGFR-mutation status. Patients were randomly split into training and testing cohorts, 80% and 20%, respectively. Model 1 was used to predict positive and negative EGFR-mutation, model 2 was used to predict 19del and non-19del mutations, and model 3 was used to predict L858R and non-L858R mutations. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate their performance.ResultsFor the three models, model 1 had AUC values of 0.969 and 0.886 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Model 2 had AUC values of 0.999 and 0.847 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Model 3 had AUC values of 0.984 and 0.806 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.ConclusionCombined models that incorporate radiomics signature, clinical, and CT morphological features may serve as an auxiliary tool to predict EGFR-mutation subtypes and contribute to individualized treatment for patients with LADC.
| S-EPMC9434115 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Radiomics analyses commonly apply imaging features of different complexity for the prediction of the endpoint of interest. However, the prognostic value of each feature class is generally unclear. Furthermore, many radiomics models lack independent external validation that is decisive for their clinical application. Therefore, in this manuscript we present two complementary studies. In our modelling study, we developed and validated different radiomics signatures for outcome prediction after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on computed tomography (CT) and T2-weighted (T2w) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets of 4 independent institutions (training: 122, validation 68 patients). We compared different feature classes extracted from the gross tumour volume for the prognosis of tumour response and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM): morphological and first order (MFO) features, second order texture (SOT) features, and Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) transformed intensity features. Analyses were performed for CT and MRI separately and combined. Model performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) and the concordance index (CI) for tumour response and FFDM, respectively. Overall, intensity features of LoG transformed CT and MR imaging combined with clinical T stage (cT) showed the best performance for tumour response prediction, while SOT features showed good performance for FFDM in independent validation (AUC = 0.70, CI = 0.69). In our external validation study, we aimed to validate previously published radiomics signatures on our multicentre cohort. We identified relevant publications on comparable patient datasets through a literature search and applied the reported radiomics models to our dataset. Only one of the identified studies could be validated, indicating an overall lack of reproducibility and the need of further standardization of radiomics before clinical application.
| S-EPMC9205935 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Two major treatment strategies employed in non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, are tyrosine kinase inhibitors, TKIs, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs. The choice of strategy is based on heterogeneous biomarkers that can dynamically change during therapy. Thus, there is a compelling need to identify comprehensive biomarkers that can be used longitudinally to help guide therapy choice. Herein, we report a 18F-FDG-PET/CT-based deep learning model, which demonstrates high accuracy in EGFR mutation status prediction across patient cohorts from different institutions. A deep learning score (EGFR-DLS) was significantly and positively associated with longer progression free survival (PFS) in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, while EGFR-DLS is significantly and negatively associated with higher durable clinical benefit, reduced hyperprogression, and longer PFS among patients treated with ICIs. Thus, the EGFR-DLS provides a non-invasive method for precise quantification of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC patients, which is promising to identify NSCLC patients sensitive to EGFR-TKI or ICI-treatments.
| S-EPMC7567795 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate inter- and intra- scan mode and scanner repeatability and reproducibility of radiomics features within and between single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT).MethodsA standardized phantom with sixteen rods of clinical-relevant densities was scanned on seven DECT-capable scanners and three SECT-only scanners. The acquisition parameters were selected to present typical abdomen-pelvic examinations with the same voxel size. Images of SECT at 120 kVp and corresponding 120 kVp-like virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) in DECT which were generated according to scanners were analyzed. Regions of interest were drawn with rigid registrations to avoid variations due to segmentation. Radiomics features were extracted via Pyradiomics platform. Test-retest repeatability was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis for repeated scans. Intra-scanner reproducibility for different scan modes was tested by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-scanner reproducibility among different scanners for same scan mode was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).ResultsThe test-retest analysis presented that 92.91% and 87.02% of the 94 assessed features were repeatable for SECT 120kVp and DECT 120 kVp-like VMIs, respectively. The intra-scanner analysis for SECT 120kVp vs DECT 120 kVp-like VMIs demonstrated that 10.76% and 10.28% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively. The inter-scanner analysis showed that 17.09% and 27.73% of features for SECT 120kVp were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, and 15.16% and 32.78% for DECT 120 kVp-like VMIs, respectively.ConclusionsThe majority of radiomics features were non-reproducible within and between SECT and DECT.Key points• Although the test-retest analysis showed high repeatability for radiomics features, the overall reproducibility of radiomics features within and between SECT and DECT was low. • Only about one-tenth of radiomics features extracted from SECT images and corresponding DECT images did match each other, even their average photon energy levels were considered alike, indicating that the scan mode potentially altered the radiomics features. • Less than one-fifth of radiomics features were reproducible among multiple SECT and DECT scanners, regardless of their fixed acquisition and reconstruction parameters, suggesting the necessity of scanning protocol adjustment and post-scan harmonization process.
| S-EPMC9279234 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrognosis in oesophageal cancer (OC) is poor. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate is approximately 15%. Personalised medicine is hoped to increase the 5- and 10-year OS rates. Quantitative analysis of PET is gaining substantial interest in prognostic research but requires the accurate definition of the metabolic tumour volume. This study compares prognostic models developed in the same patient cohort using individual PET segmentation algorithms and assesses the impact on patient risk stratification. Consecutive patients (n?=?427) with biopsy-proven OC were included in final analysis. All patients were staged with PET/CT between September 2010 and July 2016. Nine automatic PET segmentation methods were studied. All tumour contours were subjectively analysed for accuracy, and segmentation methods with <?90% accuracy were excluded. Standardised image features were calculated, and a series of prognostic models were developed using identical clinical data. The proportion of patients changing risk classification group were calculated.ResultsOut of nine PET segmentation methods studied, clustering means (KM2), general clustering means (GCM3), adaptive thresholding (AT) and watershed thresholding (WT) methods were included for analysis. Known clinical prognostic factors (age, treatment and staging) were significant in all of the developed prognostic models. AT and KM2 segmentation methods developed identical prognostic models. Patient risk stratification was dependent on the segmentation method used to develop the prognostic model with up to 73 patients (17.1%) changing risk stratification group.ConclusionPrognostic models incorporating quantitative image features are dependent on the method used to delineate the primary tumour. This has a subsequent effect on risk stratification, with patients changing groups depending on the image segmentation method used.
| S-EPMC5895559 | biostudies-literature