Dataset Information

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate-Emtricitabine based Oral Antiretroviral Regimen for Prevention of HIV Acquisition in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Daily oral emtricitabine (FTC, F)/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) combination is approved for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in men and women. Tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) is a newer, more potent prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), and in combination with FTC, has recently been approved for prevention of HIV through rectal transmission.

Methods

This Phase I, prospective, interventional, randomized study was conducted in three clinical sites: PROFAMILIA, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; University of Pittsburgh and Eastern Virginia Medical School. We assessed the multi-compartmental pharmacokinetics (primary outcome) and safety (secondary outcome) among HIV uninfected women randomized to F/TDF (200mg/300mg) or F/TAF (200mg/25mg; F/TAF25) (n=24) in a single dose phase (SDP) and F/TDF, F/TAF (200mg/10mg; F/TAF10), or F/TAF25 (n=75) in a multiple dose (14 daily doses) phase (MDP). We described PK parameters in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and cervicovaginal (CV) and rectal fluids and tissues. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02904369, completed.

Findings

Recruitment for the study began on 5 October 2016. The first participant was enrolled on 6 October 2016 and the last participant completed the study 21 November 2017.

Plasma

TFV concentrations area under curve (AUC) were ~20 fold lower following F/TAF versus F/TDF. TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) AUC concentrations in PBMCs were 7-fold higher with F/TAF25 versus F/TDF. Median TFV-DP concentrations in vaginal tissue (4hours post last dose) were approximately 6-fold higher with F/TAF25 versus F/TDF. TFV and TFV-DP were lower with F/TAF versus F/TDF in rectal tissue. Concentrations of FTC and FTC-triphosphate (FTC-TP) were similar across matrices and treatment arms. Gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently in F/TDF users (44.0%) than in either F/TAF group (11.5 and 12.0%).

Interpretation

F/TAF was safe and well-tolerated. TFV-DP concentrations were higher in PBMCs and similar or higher (4h post dose) in female genital tract tissues for F/TAF versus F/TDF. High FTC and FTC-TP concentrations in all compartments support the potential of F/TAF as a new PrEP combination for women.

SUBMITTER: Thurman AR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8144741 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTopical on-demand forms for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be a desirable alternative for people that prefer not to use daily PrEP. CONRAD has developed inserts containing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and elvitegravir (EVG) for on-demand vaginal or rectal pericoital use. We assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pre-exposure efficacy of rectally applied TAF/EVG inserts in macaques.MethodsPK was assessed in 12 pigtailed macaques. Tenofovir (TFV) and EVG levels were assayed in rectal biopsies and secretions, and tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) levels in biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Drug biodistribution was evaluated in 10 animals at necropsy 4 h post-dosing. For efficacy assessments, one or two TAF/EVG inserts were administered to macaques (n = 6) 4 h before repeated rectal SHIV162p3 challenges.FindingsOne TAF/EVG insert resulted in rapid and high EVG and TFV-DP in rectal tissue 4 h after application. Adding a second insert led to a 10-fold increase in EVG and TFV-DP in rectal tissue. Efficacy of one and two TAF/EVG inserts were 72.6% (CI 24.5%-92.6%) and 93.1% (CI 73.3%-99.2%), respectively.InterpretationAlthough high TFV-DP and EVG levels were observed with one rectal TAF/EVG insert, it only conferred partial protection from rectal SHIV challenges. Adding a second insert led to an increase in TFV and EVG in rectal tissues resulting in higher (>90%) efficacy. These results highlight the high efficacy of TAF/EVG inserts as topical on-demand rectal PrEP, as well as the need for appropriate drug coverage in the deep rectum and colon to achieve high protection.FundingThe work related to animal studies was funded by CDC intramural funds and an interagency agreement between CDC and USAID (USAID/CDC IAA AID-GH-T-15-00002). The work related to the insert formulation was funded by U.S. PEPFAR through USAID under a Cooperative Agreement (AID-OAA-A-14-00010) with CONRAD/Eastern Virginia Medical School. The findings and conclusions of this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USAID, President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS), or the US government.

Project description:BackgroundIn human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment, tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is associated with greater increases in all fasting cholesterol subgroups compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Because lipid abnormalities may contribute to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, cardiovascular risk assessment is integral to routine HIV care. This post hoc study evaluates the impact of lipid changes on predicted atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk and statin eligibility in treatment-naive adults living with HIV treated with TAF or TDF.MethodsParticipants (N = 1744) were randomized (1:1) to initiate TAF or TDF, each coformulated with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine (studies GS-US-292-0104 and GS-US-292-0111). Eligibility for statin therapy and estimated 10-year ASCVD risk among adults aged 40-79 years treated with TAF or TDF for 96 weeks (W96) were analyzed based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Pooled Cohort Equations. Categorical shifts in 10-year ASCVD risk from <7.5% to ≥7.5% by W96 on TAF versus TDF were calculated.ResultsParticipants initiating TAF versus TDF in the overall study population showed small but significant increases in median fasting lipid parameters at W96, including total cholesterol (191 vs 177 mg/dL; P < .001), low-density lipoprotein ([LDL] 119 vs 112 mg/dL; P < .001), and high-density lipoprotein ([HDL] 51 vs 48 mg/dL; P < .001), respectively. At baseline, 18% and 23% on TAF versus TDF had a 10-year ASCVD risk score ≥7.5%, with mean risk scores low overall for TAF versus TDF at baseline (4.9% vs 5.4%; P = .35) and W96 (6.1% vs 6.2%; P = .04). Increases in ASCVD risk from baseline to W96 were driven by both increasing age and changes in total cholesterol (TC) and HDL cholesterol. At W96, TC/HDL ratios (median) were 3.7 for both groups (P = .69). There was no difference between shifts in categorical risk for TAF versus TDF (9% vs 5%; P = .19). Eligibility for high-intensity statin therapy were similar for TAF versus TDF groups (19% vs 21%; P = .47).ConclusionsLipid changes with TAF as part of coformulated regimens do not substantively affect CVD risk profiles compared with TDF.